<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Market for Liberty PDF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freekeene.com/2008/02/07/the-market-for-liberty-pdf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freekeene.com/2008/02/07/the-market-for-liberty-pdf/</link>
	<description>Peaceful Evolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:29:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2008/02/07/the-market-for-liberty-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-77831</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/2008/02/07/the-market-for-liberty-pdf/#comment-77831</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m listening to the audio version now -- it&#039;s good, but I wish so many of these works did not assume an atheist, as well as evolutionist perspective as a basis for its arguments. In addition, this book throws an objectivist morality on top -- the opposition to voluntary charity, which I think is totally uncalled for.

There are many people in this country who believe in God as the basis for morality, and even more who believe voluntary charity is good -- to intentionally disclude them from a work attempting to promote liberty is counterproductive.

I myself am a Christian, but were I to write a pro-liberty work, I would certainly not use a belief in Christ as the basis for my reasoning.

That said, I&#039;m greatly enjoying the bulk of the book, which supports and explains a voluntary society -- it is excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m listening to the audio version now &#8212; it&#8217;s good, but I wish so many of these works did not assume an atheist, as well as evolutionist perspective as a basis for its arguments. In addition, this book throws an objectivist morality on top &#8212; the opposition to voluntary charity, which I think is totally uncalled for.</p>
<p>There are many people in this country who believe in God as the basis for morality, and even more who believe voluntary charity is good &#8212; to intentionally disclude them from a work attempting to promote liberty is counterproductive.</p>
<p>I myself am a Christian, but were I to write a pro-liberty work, I would certainly not use a belief in Christ as the basis for my reasoning.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m greatly enjoying the bulk of the book, which supports and explains a voluntary society &#8212; it is excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living Off Dividends &#38; Passive Income</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2008/02/07/the-market-for-liberty-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-77281</link>
		<dc:creator>Living Off Dividends &#38; Passive Income</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 04:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/2008/02/07/the-market-for-liberty-pdf/#comment-77281</guid>
		<description>thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Ransom</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2008/02/07/the-market-for-liberty-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-77280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Ransom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 03:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/2008/02/07/the-market-for-liberty-pdf/#comment-77280</guid>
		<description>ok</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
