“II. “”Oral communication” means any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation.”

What is a “circumstance justifying such expectation” that a person will not be recorded and how does a person “exhibit an expectation” that his conversation isn’t being recorded? No one should have an expectation of privacy from being recorded unless the person is on their own property.

33 states have one party consent law and I don’t see any problems with it.

I found there was a bill introduced to change the law not long after Gannon’s arrest. I guess nothing good came of it.