Comments on: An Open Letter to “Judge” Edward Burke

By: Dacque

Dacque — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:24:22 +0000

I know Eddy Burke, he is a scumbag to 10th degree. He always has. His whole family are scumbags. His middle kid is a fk up. Semi retarded works construction and takes drugs and drinks most of the day away. His wife is a functioning alcoholic, like most of his family. Her name is Kathleen Kennedy, from the Kennedy Information Systems company. It was sold several years back for millions. All the Kennedy’s are alcoholics, homosexuals (admitted and living so) or whores. One had her kids in high school. Others live in the their parents apartment buildings.

By: rod

rod — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:15:33 +0000

We as a people have to ask ourselves when and where to to take a stand. Ian did just that. Now when we will we, as free people, ( for now ) will have to find the courage to stand up for what our forefathers fought for. Lets take back our FREEDOM!

By: JDFS

JDFS — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:07:52 +0000

http://www.jail4judges.org/

By: Zeus

Zeus — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:06:08 +0000

After all, you folks are just so pleasant when confronted by others who don’t necessarily share your, um, “unique” worldview.

Well, you seem to know so much about us and what we believe, why don’t you explain for posterity’s sake what our worldview is for future readers of this board?

Of course, you can’t because you either don’t know it or you don’t understand it. It’s so difficult for statists like yourself to grasp such simple concepts like “government is force”, “don’t initiate the violence of the state on others”, “don’t force others to pay for a government program just because you want it” and “power corrupts absolutely”. The Golden Rule can be so confounding!

No, understanding any of that would suit your agenda as a troll and it’s far easier for you not to make an honest effort to comprehend our worldview so you can continue being a smug, superior, self-righteous asshole in your posts.

By: Curt Springer

Curt Springer — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:52:57 +0000

One cool thing about NH is that very few officials have had unlisted phone numbers. Even the governor has a public listing for his home in Hopkinton. This is because NH people tend to respect each other’s privacy and don’t call for frivolous or harassing reasons. But you can get to people high in the food chain if you need their help.

Please don’t harass the judge or anybody else and drive them all to unlisted numbers.

By: AnAmazedReader

AnAmazedReader — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:02:59 +0000

Wow, Clint, publishing a judge’s phone number and address so the self-righteous nut jobs on this site can harass him and his family. How peaceful. Gee, I wonder why the complainant in “L’affaire du Couch” didn’t feel comfortable talking to Ian directly. After all, you folks are just so pleasant when confronted by others who don’t necessarily share your, um, “unique” worldview.

By: clint

clint — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:24:49 +0000

Here is Burkes phone number and address:

(603) 352-6168

Edward J Burke
2 Lilac Ln
Keene, NH 03431

By: Anti Police State guy

Anti Police State guy — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:01:14 +0000

Ian get over it man. You tried to talk to the judge when he was still calling the docket. That’s a courtroom norm and if you were in his courtroom alot you should know that. I’m sorry you had to go thru this over a couch but this about a couch in a yard. Why the city is upset about a couch in yard I don’t know. (seems like there is more to the story then your telling us) Your turning this into to something more than it is. Your acting like the city took your first born and sent them to GITMO. Come on man……your better off fighting for a cause better than a couch. Like focusing on the soon to be Democratic majority in D.C. to overturn the Patriot act.

By: Curt Springer

Curt Springer — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:01:39 +0000

Well sure, somebody is looking at the books. I don’t doubt that every so often they raise the fines in the standard schedule. But I don’t think there is any basis for saying that judges are pressured to return more guilty verdicts to bring in more revenue.

And the judge will hear any case placed before him precisely because he is honest and has principles. He will not act capriciously like some mini-tyrant picking and choosing which laws and judicial standards he feels like complying with, and which he does not.

By: JoelG

JoelG — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:48:40 +0000

Curt Springer – Whether or not the JUDGE is swayed by the remunerative aspect of fines, the SYSTEM surely is, and the judge…unless he’s honest and has principles, and where would we fine one of those?…is going to hear any case placed before him. The “legal” profession is a closed clique, and they surely do support each other.