Comments on: A Special Thank You to the New Hampshire Justice System

By: Scott Darin , Drury

Scott Darin , Drury — Tue, 19 May 2009 17:00:09 +0000

one of the criteria for going forward as john doe is actions against government policy , law , and activity do read up on the case law doe v.s.frank and the related cases the idea is that it could cause to much attention to a person to stand up against the government and could cause you to be shunned .

By: Charlie

Charlie — Sun, 17 May 2009 18:08:11 +0000

Part of this made the Mises blog.

http://blog.mises.org/archives/009950.asp

By: Paul

Paul — Sun, 17 May 2009 03:10:59 +0000

While I agree that the actions of the bureaucrats are not honorable enough to be called civil disobedience, I do not agree with your definition. Civil disobedience certainly can be performed against an immoral law. Many famous examples of civil disobedience were performed against immoral law.

Here’s how Webster defines it: “refusal to obey governmental demands or commands especially as a nonviolent and usually collective means of forcing concessions from the government”

It makes no difference whether the commands or demands come in the form of law or not.

By: Patriot Henry

Patriot Henry — Sat, 16 May 2009 23:54:32 +0000

“Essentially, they have engaged in civil disobedience, ”

No, those are crimes they are committing. What you have done is civil disobedience. A crime is the violation of the law; civil disobedience is the violation of the unlawful order of the government.

By: Scott Darin , Drury

Scott Darin , Drury — Sat, 16 May 2009 22:11:28 +0000

going forward as john doe as plaintiff your not the first Doe v.s. Frank 951 F. 2d 320 (11th circuit year 1992 )set some standards though you may not fit some criteria of this case precidence umm the fact is
the idea has been heard and is some times allowed

By: Scott Darin , Drury

Scott Darin , Drury — Sat, 16 May 2009 16:30:03 +0000

it is importanant to get habeas corpus heard before st sate supreme court my studies show you ought to to bring to state supreme court before petitioning the united states of america which would bring a wider attention to more of the people hey sam don’t die a martyr we will not hold it against you if you eat bringing the habeas corpus issue is one the best solutions to the procedural violation you can be sure they are quaking in their boots you are correct about
the name being irrelivant you are the defendant of the charges and plaintiff in your petition for the writ of habeas corpus and the address is the court which you seek remedy .Getting this habeas corpus procedure all the way to the state supreme court for the us supreme court hears appeal from state supreme courts directly bypassing lower courts habeas has priority you appear willing to do the time to get the habeas to the supreme court that is the only sacrifice you need to do if you get the court to hear you as a defendant and address as the court you seek remedy it will be the shot heard around the world. GOD help you and your friends especially the ones filing thes writs .eat be strong fight long your cause to get habeas heard under your terms is a final blow

By: Jim Davidson

Jim Davidson — Sat, 16 May 2009 00:00:21 +0000

Sam doesn’t eat while in jail.

If Sam doesn’t have his freedom, why should the judge get to sleep?

Looks like 56 Chapman Rd is the younger Edward Burke in town. The older one, age 60+, is at 28 Village Dr, Apt 3, and has a son named E Burke. So, there ya go.

Go by at 03:00 and honk your horn until you see lights inside the house, then drive on.

No freedom for Sam? No sleep for Judge Burke.

When they start parking a police car out front, walk to the nearest corner, set of an air horn, and split.

By: Adam

Adam — Fri, 15 May 2009 16:05:46 +0000

Fair enough – thanks.

By: charley hardman

charley hardman — Fri, 15 May 2009 16:00:11 +0000

[...] expand on your point on the etymology of “activism”?

sure, but probably not as much as you might expect. my primary objection to “activism” is that it’s the bastard cousin of “change” (fireboming tokyo was change). so someone’s “active”? who gives a damn, y’know? nazis were active. the freaks who carried sam away were active. it smells like lemmings and badges on sleeves. americorps.

the same complaint, in lesser form, may be made of terms such as “resistance”, but there’s so much dreck associated with socialist language that it should be avoided where truth doesn’t tilt the balance. i see nothing missing from simply calling oneself an individualist or voluntarist, for everything follows logically from there.

“civil rights”. same problem. anything with “civil”, “citizen”, blah blah. too much taint of asking permission to live.

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 15 May 2009 12:38:17 +0000

At least you are not getting your brain damaged with E.C.T. every other Wednesday like Ray Sandford. Brain damaged to make the prisoner(you call a mental patient) become cooperative, predictable and obediant. E.C.T. for a disease that doesn’t exist, as science can not find mental illness under a microscope, MRI or blood sample.
http://www.mindfreedom.org/shield/ray/sandford-faq
Be thankful authority lets you have your mind.