Comments on: BREAKING NEWS: Sam Kicked Out of Jail!

By: Edward J. Burkah

Edward J. Burkah — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:30:32 +0000

Now, Mr. Springer, you are a pompous and naive buffoon, if you truly believe what you’ve posted above. Of course I knew exactly what was going on. I’m not a neutral arbiter of legal issues. Fuck no! Eli Rivera, my staff & court clerk, the cops, local fat cats & big wigs, hey, we’re all on the same team here. Ex Parte communication – not disclosed as such -is a staple in my court. Issuing “orders” containing information not disclosed at hearing is another favorite trick in my playbook. What, you think that shithead Brian Tucker, or “John-Boy-Benedict” Arnold would EVER DARE overturn a decision of mine? You’re freaking dreaming, dude. This shit is deeper, and more real, than your little Shangri-LaLa Land, Curt. I FUCK WITH PEOPLE’S LIVES BECAUSE I CAN! WHAT OTHER REASON DO I NEED? NO, Curt, I am NOT a GOOD man, at all. I’m an evil little bastard, and that’s how I like it. Thanks for the posts, though, Curt. You’ve saved me a lot of time making my snap decisions, when you’ve posted links to NH RSA’s & such. I had no idea there was so much actual, fucking LAW in this two-bit little shit-hole state. If you’re ever in my court, Curt, I’ll send you to County Farm in Sheriff’s shackles, then you can see how real this shit is. SIT UP! STAND DOWN, NOW!…ejb…

By: Curt Springer

Curt Springer — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:50:09 +0000

Thanks ghost for your ocmments. I think we will have to get more information before we can give a full and fair assessment of the actors in this case. In the meantime I hope you will all have a great evening of celebration.

By: Matthew

Matthew — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:32:55 +0000

I hope they won’t accuse Sam of “stealing” those orange clothes down the line.

By: Mitch

Mitch — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:13:35 +0000

Glad to hear you’re out Sam!

By: The Ghost of Generic Civil War Soldier

The Ghost of Generic Civil War Soldier — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:53:29 +0000

Judge Burke might think he’s a great guy doing a great service. Good people might do bad things, in this case, Judge Burke continually does bad things.

Does that make him a bad person? No, but it does make him a douchebag, worthy of no praise or admiration. He is dishonorable, dishonest, and disgusting.

I admire you Curt but I wonder if you would say the same after you were kept in a cell for almost 60 days on the most frivolous of charges. There are plenty of people to blame here. . . the Keene police for kidnapping an innocent man on the whims of the Court, The court itself, that fat load Eli, and of course the all powerful Burke.

He has a hard on to try and get Freestaters to obey. Sam chose not to. He was facing a trial that would turn into a show and they feared bringing to light the audacious illegal things they’ve been doing in this situation.

By: LSNL

LSNL — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:42:41 +0000

This is wonderful news! I wish I could be there tonight to thank, and congratulate Sam! Please keep it up!

PLEASE, guys.. Please don’t give the cops any reason to come out and make any arrests! I’m willing to contribute to a limo, or van, service!

By: thinkliberty

thinkliberty — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:36:00 +0000

Curt:

You can’t say that Burke is not a bad guy. The person that kept Sam imprisoned without trial is a bad guy.

Because:
Only bad guys keep someone in a cage with no trial. Especially when that someone had broken no law and was doing something the bad guy did not like. Like if someone video recorded in a court house lobby exactly as Sam did. (It’s 100% legal to video record in a courthouse lobby.)

Sorry good guys don’t do that kind of thing. You contradicted what you have posted earlier.

Burke is a bad guy. (this is not the first time he has done something like this. Look at what he did to Ian as one example: 90 days in jail for not sitting down fast enough for the control freak. Burke gave him 6 seconds to jump down to his seat. Watch the video.)

By: SnowDog

SnowDog — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:44:30 +0000

Sam, thank you for standing up for your rights!

Thank you.

By: Curt Springer

Curt Springer — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:21:19 +0000

I read the links. They don’t contradict what I posted earlier.

I wrote:

The judge went along with keeping Sam imprisoned without trial as long as he refused to give his name. I’m not defending that.

By: thinkliberty

thinkliberty — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:10:07 +0000

From Burke’s own words:
“Through a pleading from the State serving as a status report, the Court has been advised that the State believes it has identified the Defendant as Sam
A. Miller…the Gourt is unwilling to schedule a trial date.”

So burke knew who he was and still refuse to schedule a trial for Sam and that is only the first example!

It looks like those links I posted contradict what you have posted, if you cared to read them.