Free Keene

Peaceful Evolution

Now Out Of Jail, Sam’s Story Makes News Again

Filed under: News — nick at 12:06 pm on Friday, June 26, 2009

This news just released on KeeneSentinel.com was likely also published today, Friday, in the paper. Though out of jail, the story of Sam’s detainment and trumped up charges is far from over. His courage has gained him and liberty activists in general a lot of public attention and opened a lot of eyes. It looks like that will only continue, as Sam and supporters reveal to people who otherwise wouldn’t be paying attention the corruption within the system.

Jailed Free Stater a free man
Judge orders his release pending trial on misdemeanors
By Anika Clark
Sentinel Staff
Published: Friday, June 26, 2009 1:01 PM EDT

Each year, thousands of people are forced into jail and prison cells throughout the country.

Few of them must be pushed out.

But after a nearly two-month standoff, local authorities recently kicked Keene resident Sam A. Miller out of the Cheshire County jail in Westmoreland.

“He was just refusing to leave jail,” said jail Superintendent Richard N. Van Wickler. “We eventually talked him into walking with us to the lobby where he was greeted by some of his friends.”

On June 9 — still wearing his tangerine-orange jumpsuit — Miller left the building a free man.

That is, depending on whom you ask.

A participant in the Free State Project — an attempt to draw 20,000 “liberty-loving people” to New Hampshire — Miller, 33, goes by the name “Sam Dodson” because he says his birth name has been usurped by a tyrannical government.

On April 13, he opposed that system by using a video camera in the Keene District Court lobby — defying an unsigned order, which he disputes, against photography in the area.

After allegedly refusing to turn off the camera, Miller fell limp in a sign of noncompliance. People in the lobby could hear him screaming behind a closed conference room door before police carried him out of the building.

Authorities also arrested or issued summonses to several fellow activists for allegedly failing to follow orders to leave the room.

Miller’s arrest touched off a fierce battle of wills, which led to his nearly two-month detention.

Despite the fact that court and jail officials had Miller’s Texas driver’s license and knew his real name, Judge Edward J. Burke ordered that Miller’s trial not be scheduled until he gave identifying information about himself.

That changed on June 9 when Burke ordered his release.

On June 4, Miller’s legal counsel, Ivy Walker — also known as Sharon Ankrom — was arrested, accused of having a suspended registration and two false inspection stickers and being a fugitive from justice for embezzlement charges in Rhode Island, according to a Laconia District Court employee.

A “significant consequence of those actions is that the Defendant is now deprived of counsel,” Burke wrote.

Burke then called Miller’s detainment up to that point the result of his refusal to provide a physical address, and said the “Court stands by this requirement.”

But, he wrote, “Under the unique circumstances now before the Court, the appropriate course of action is to allow the Defendant to be released (from) custody to allow him the opportunity to prepare his defense outside of his jail setting.”

Burke said he couldn’t comment about open cases.

Miller’s pending release sparked yet another showdown, when he refused to sign the bail bond because he said he couldn’t agree to the bail terms — among them that he provide his physical and mailing addresses — and wanted to wait for the arrival of his attorney.

Still, Van Wickler said, “As soon as the judge gave that order I no longer had any authority to hold Sam.”

Miller said he told authorities he wouldn’t change his clothes until he saw the terms and later wasn’t given the opportunity to change.

He now awaits a July trial on reduced, Class B misdemeanor charges of resisting arrest and common law criminal contempt.

In addition, Miller is also set to be tried for violating a city ordinance for allegedly refusing to be processed by police, according to Keene police Prosecutor D. Chris McLaughlin.

In the meantime, Miller’s new attorney, William L. O’Brien of Mont Vernon, has filed a motion to suppress on the grounds that authorities allegedly failed to read Miller his Miranda rights.

And because Miller’s arrest occurred at Keene District Court, O’Brien also filed a motion for a change of venue and a motion for Burke to recuse to himself from the trials.

Instead of the possibility for incarceration, each misdemeanor charge carries a maximum $1,200 fine, according to McLaughlin. The ordinance violation carries a maximum fine of $1,000.

But even if Miller is slapped with the highest penalties possible, this will still be less than what taxpayers probably paid to keep him in jail.

At what Van Wickler called a conservative cost estimate of $64 per day, Miller’s confinement would have cost more than $3,600.

This is a price tag that’s rankled some people who have commented on The Sentinel’s Web site.

In response to an earlier article about Miller, one reader wrote, “Perhaps showing you dont (sic) like our tax dollars being spent foolishly and giving your name just to SAVE the taxpayers which you seem to always be so concerned with would make more sense.”

So why did he do it?

“My decision to stay in (jail) was based on a number of things,” Miller said. “I was asserting my rights … and I was being held indefinitely without trial for that.”

The showdown also brought attention to the ideas of Libertarians and people affiliated with the Free State Project, according to Miller.

As for the allegation that he was sticking it to the taxpayer, he said, “I agree that it’s a total waste of money – of tax dollars and government resources — to jail peaceful, nonviolent people who haven’t hurt anybody. …

“I’m sorry,” he said. “That’s the system these people have asked for. And I agree. I think it’s terribly wasteful and inefficient, and that’s why I’m doing things to change it.”

Anika Clark can be reached at 352-1234, extension 1432, or aclark@keenesentinel.com.

http://www.keenesentinel.com/articles/2009/06/26/news/local/free/id_361218.txt

10 Comments »

Comment by jzacker

June 26, 2009 @ 10:20 pm

Maybe someone should tell the Sentinel about Dave Ridley’s 6 days in jail for the same thing (filming), costing taxpayers $384 plus the cost of the trial, processing during arrest, etc.

Comment by nick

June 26, 2009 @ 10:27 pm

A. Clark’s e-mail address is right in the end of the article. Go for it.

Comment by nick

June 27, 2009 @ 5:04 pm

Sam’s article has a sadly low amount of comments. Free-stater articles are known to attract huge attention to the Keene Sentinel site. This is strange.

Comment by Vix

June 27, 2009 @ 5:56 pm

With porkfest going on many might not know about this yet or have the ability to post yet.

Comment by Russell Kanning

June 28, 2009 @ 3:43 am

the government started acting less evil …. less comments

decent article …. funny use of the term “authorities”, as if the government thugs are them

Comment by andy tantarelli

July 2, 2009 @ 7:51 pm

what you went through was a picnic.

you don’t ever want to end up in a real jail.

trust me,you don’t.

Comment by Edward J. Burkah

July 2, 2009 @ 10:08 pm

Mr Tantarelli! I see that you’re next on my docket! CONTEMPT OF LOGIC! 30 days solitary confinement, sentence to be served in same cell with FRAKER, me-damn-it! We’ve got PLENTY of room in Valley Street Jail, now that the Feds have pulled *THEIR* prisoners out! Like, what, you think Westmoreland County Farm is some sorta SUMMER CAMP!?!?!?…AGGRAVATED CONTEMPT! MAXIMUM SENTENCE! You’re free to go, but only if you don’t leave…god, I’m getting major league wood over this shit! AHH! OOOH! UGHHH! OH! CRAP! I just lewinskied my bestest favoritest robe…BRB……TTYL….

Comment by Edward J. Burkah

July 2, 2009 @ 10:39 pm

No, really, Cynthia! I’m getting a serious case of the guilts for stealing Bill Hutchinson’s kids’ home. OK, I only *HELPED*, OK???….not like it was *MY* idea! But I had to violate some serious Court Rules in that case! They have the force of LAW, you know! I knew that I shouldn’t have listened to Tim Robertson…pot-smoking atheist! Unitarian Universalist Church, MY ASS! We should steal their stoned church building or something…damn queers…rainbow flag & everything…SHIT! IS THIS KEYBOARD TURNED ON?!?!?!…AM I BEING KEY-STROKE LOGGED???…Um, Ms. Little, when you’re done polishing my wood, could you get Stillman Rogers on the horn? I need another $50 G’s to pay off that rat John Arnold over in Superior Court. Brian Tucker is threatening to expose how Heed cheats to win all those canoe races again, if I don’t pony up…OH! AAron! Nice to see you again. Let me power down my key-letter thingy here, ok?…too many damn broads in *THIS* good-old-boy network! Chuck Douglas was right…I shoulda stayed in private practice…I’m getting Too OLD for this shit!…OH! Lucille! WHAT!? THE FREE KEENE BLOG! NO! Ah, fuckit…we’re getting DE-CERTIFIED soon, anyway….

Comment by C Brettell

July 7, 2009 @ 5:21 pm

I am in the UK. Even on terrorist charges we can only be held for 28 days maximum with no charge.I would be interested to know if this sort of case has happened here in the UK,very very quiet if it has.Quite an amazement to me what huge possibilities the “authorities“ are giving themselves to quell our enthusiasm for freedom.I am neither from the left or right paradigm,[to quote a well known radio host!]This story has fascinated me as I follow it.People here in the UK are quite shocked when they hear it,disbelieving even,“no,that couldn`t happen in the USA,land of freedom,upholding the law and democracy“.lol.and there shall we follow,we always do :(

Comment by Jake_Witmer

July 18, 2009 @ 7:51 am

Remember, no injustice can come to fruition without the blessing of the people. (Albeit, the people smart enough to feign conformity and allow themselves to be hand-picked by the prosecution, during “voir dire”. Read http://www.juryduty.org/JuryDuty.htm for more about that process.) I strongly suggest that everyone here familiarize themselves with the following links, and spread the information as far and wide as possible. Be polite, courteous, and let your fellow man know that he is under no obligation to “enforce the law” once he is seated on a jury.

http://isil.org/resources/lit/history-jury-null.html
http://isil.org/resources/lit/new-hope-fija.html
http://www.juryduty.org/JuryDuty.htm
http://www.fija.org

Once seated on a jury, the citizen becomes higher in power than the law, and can return a “not guilty” verdict, even if doing so obviously violates the law, and holds the court in contempt.

There are two sets of laws. The “common law” is also known as outlawing “mala in se” crimes or “actions that are crimes, in and of themselves”. “Mala prohibita” laws, on the other hand, prohibit victimless crimes (Things that would not commonly be considered a crime, if it were not for legislation against it. “Victimless crimes” fall into this category. They are things that might cause a crime –in a weak-minded person– but not cause a crime in a strong-minded person, such as drinking alcohol or snorting cocaine. Doing the thing by itself doesn’t need to harm anyone. Only when incorrect socialist views of life are applied as a standard is there “harm”.)

On the other hand, “mala in se” crimes always cause two things: “harm” and “causation”.
1) Harm is obvious. Someone’s person or rightfully-acquired property has been forcibly damaged, removed, or destroyed, against their will. (examples: assault, theft, murder)
2) The person doing the damage knew that they were violating their victim’s rights, and they did it anyway. …The person knowingly “caused” harm. (everyone knows that assault, theft, and murder are wrong, except the insane and severely mentally retarded, who are held to a different legal standard precisely for this reason.)

The Libertarian view of reality is that “mala in se” crimes should be the only things considered crimes on the books.

Since the government has no right to do anything except defend the innocent, the courts should be virtually empty, even if noone pays their taxes, and everyone uses dangerous drugs. The government should not steal from anyone (tax them). The government should come to the people with their hat in their hand, and beg for money.

All payments to the government should be voluntary.

If this was the case, then I imagine there might be a stigma associated with tax nonpayment, especially among the wealthy, and especially on government workers who failed to pay.

In the current situation, the government tries to create a social stigma by threatening everyone with imprisonment if they don’t pay taxes. Therefore, anyone who stil refuses to pay is seen as “getting away with something”. The government is therefore relying on jealousy to turn Americans into a nation of backstabbing snitches.

Imagine the once proud and rebellious citizen-jurors of the Founding era, now reduced to being hauled into tax court and violated by the willing accomplices of the British. Then remember that the 2% tax on tea that the colonists rebelled against was nothing in comparison to the crushing regulation and taxation of the current day.

Of course, the idea that you’re getting anything in return for your money is absurd. The typical American purchases only coercion against innocent people with his cowardice in the jury deliberation room.

Sam Dodson is a hero.

Someone I know got a letter from the IRS today. It appears they may wish the Sam’s fate upon me, and for us all. They now have enough cages to hold us all, and are most likely willing to go to any length to destroy us all. Everyone on this board, everyone who thinks for themselves. Everyone willing to move to an inhospitable state away from their families in the service of individual freedom.

They can put me in a cage, and if I die there, know that it was them that killed me.

(Anyone who is arrested for a “malum prohibitum” offense should ask the cop who arrested him if the citation is a cause of action against them. If he says yes, ask him what the elements of a valid cause of action are. (The prosecutor and judge won’t allow this, and will declare the cop unfit to comment. If he’s unfit to comment, object, and move to dismiss his testimony/”testilying”) If you ask the average cop on the police stand if he took an oath to uphold the constitution, he will say “yes”. –This happened when I asked that question in a traffic case in Racine, WI.– If you ask the average cop if he knows the difference between the “common law”, and “mala prohibita” laws, he will not. If you ask him if he knows the difference between a “common law jury trial”, and a rigged jury trial, he will not –and the prosecutor and judge will tell him not to answer–. If you then ask him if he’s read the constitution, he will say “yes”. If you then ask him if he understands the constitution’s bill of rights, he will stutter and the judge and prosecutor will come to his “defense”, declaring him unfit to comment. This means he is not competent to give testimony against you, since he doesn’t know how to honor his oath. If the questioning is allowed, simply probe him on:
1–How can he allow “voir dire” to transpire, if he took an oath to uphold common law jury trial? After all, “voir dire” directly negates the existence of the “common law jury”.)

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Find-Freedom.htm?At=044844&From=News

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation

Subscribe without commenting