<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Forgets His Own Arbitrary Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/</link>
	<description>Peaceful Evolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-83044</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-83044</guid>
		<description>Bingo Alex, great points. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo Alex, great points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex FM</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-83041</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex FM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-83041</guid>
		<description>Well, the Judge let it go.  That&#039;s good, in my opinion.   Regardless of the exact motivation,(1) maybe he was just too busy to bother.... (2) maybe he isn&#039;t consistent, (3) maybe the word &quot;please&quot; might actually be a magic or persuasive word for him..... but in any case, the first steps towards &quot;normalization&quot; comes through little concessions like this.   
 
Maybe when he realizes that the presence of the hat actually _isn&#039;t_ disruptive, he will cease to bother enforcing it at all.  Sometimes brainwashing can be hard to undo.... and to believe that a hat has any bearing on &quot;order&quot; is certainly a form of brainwashing.  But when that process can be reversed, it&#039;s a good thing. 
 
You probably ought to tow a fine line when making these kinds of criticisms.  It&#039;s not like he reads this blog, but still..... it serves no real purpose to call him out on this kind of thing, because to call him out on inconsistency is to sort of implies that you WANT him to hassle people about hats.  But that&#039;s is not what we want.  Inconsistency is NOT a bad thing.... if the reason for the change is that the person wants to correct a past error they made.  
 
People will often do dumb things to &quot;save face.&quot;  Don&#039;t embarass him about his past mistakes.  Just let him gracefully accept that he was wrong before, and let him come to terms with that.  When he sees hats are no threat, and when he sees that court spectators are polite and no threat at all, he&#039;ll finally let go of all the silliness that he once clung to. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Judge let it go.  That&#039;s good, in my opinion.   Regardless of the exact motivation,(1) maybe he was just too busy to bother&#8230;. (2) maybe he isn&#039;t consistent, (3) maybe the word &quot;please&quot; might actually be a magic or persuasive word for him&#8230;.. but in any case, the first steps towards &quot;normalization&quot; comes through little concessions like this.  </p>
<p>Maybe when he realizes that the presence of the hat actually _isn&#039;t_ disruptive, he will cease to bother enforcing it at all.  Sometimes brainwashing can be hard to undo&#8230;. and to believe that a hat has any bearing on &quot;order&quot; is certainly a form of brainwashing.  But when that process can be reversed, it&#039;s a good thing.</p>
<p>You probably ought to tow a fine line when making these kinds of criticisms.  It&#039;s not like he reads this blog, but still&#8230;.. it serves no real purpose to call him out on this kind of thing, because to call him out on inconsistency is to sort of implies that you WANT him to hassle people about hats.  But that&#039;s is not what we want.  Inconsistency is NOT a bad thing&#8230;. if the reason for the change is that the person wants to correct a past error they made. </p>
<p>People will often do dumb things to &quot;save face.&quot;  Don&#039;t embarass him about his past mistakes.  Just let him gracefully accept that he was wrong before, and let him come to terms with that.  When he sees hats are no threat, and when he sees that court spectators are polite and no threat at all, he&#039;ll finally let go of all the silliness that he once clung to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peacemaker</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-82609</link>
		<dc:creator>Peacemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-82609</guid>
		<description>Burke appears to really be loving the spotlight as he truly enjoyed weilding his power with his comment, therby showing off.   
 
Too bad Jesse didn&#039;t cooperate, I guess the judge was in an extra good mood because he had a big audience and so,he let him go this time. 
 
I wonder what effect if any Jesse saying &quot;please&quot; had on the outcome. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burke appears to really be loving the spotlight as he truly enjoyed weilding his power with his comment, therby showing off.  </p>
<p>Too bad Jesse didn&#039;t cooperate, I guess the judge was in an extra good mood because he had a big audience and so,he let him go this time.</p>
<p>I wonder what effect if any Jesse saying &quot;please&quot; had on the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-82589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-82589</guid>
		<description>Hat crimes are terrible! Or is that hate crimes? It&#039;s so easy to get the two confused... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hat crimes are terrible! Or is that hate crimes? It&#039;s so easy to get the two confused&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-82586</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-82586</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m starting to like this guy burke.  seems like he&#039;s a real person, not just some arbitrary man in a black dress.   
 
of course i&#039;m sure the powers that be put pressure on him to hold the line... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#039;m starting to like this guy burke.  seems like he&#039;s a real person, not just some arbitrary man in a black dress.  </p>
<p>of course i&#039;m sure the powers that be put pressure on him to hold the line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh N</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-82582</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-82582</guid>
		<description>Lets get Big Mike in there with a Sombrero. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets get Big Mike in there with a Sombrero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jitgos</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-82572</link>
		<dc:creator>Jitgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-82572</guid>
		<description>LOL Good for Jesse! Deciding to sit in the back with that kind of hat on was very courteous too. Difficult to claim he was a distraction sitting back there. 
 
And assawyer I think Burke was smirking an evil smile when making that comment. Surprised me that he backed down. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Good for Jesse! Deciding to sit in the back with that kind of hat on was very courteous too. Difficult to claim he was a distraction sitting back there.</p>
<p>And assawyer I think Burke was smirking an evil smile when making that comment. Surprised me that he backed down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamIam</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-82571</link>
		<dc:creator>SamIam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-82571</guid>
		<description>The Keene Sentinel reporters don&#039;t even bother filing motions to bring cameras into Superior court. Humm, I wonder why that is. . . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Keene Sentinel reporters don&#039;t even bother filing motions to bring cameras into Superior court. Humm, I wonder why that is. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assawyer</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-82570</link>
		<dc:creator>assawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-82570</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t tell if Burke actually believes it when he says &quot;go out and file a motion and I&#039;ll take a look at it.&quot; Is he smirking when he says it, or is it because its flat out ridiculous. Burke knew that his arbitrary rule on hats cannot survive any legal challenge, probably why he ended up letting the hat stay on. Not sure how a hat disrupts a proceeding, other than when the judge decides on his own whim that it does and hopes no one calls him on it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#039;t tell if Burke actually believes it when he says &quot;go out and file a motion and I&#039;ll take a look at it.&quot; Is he smirking when he says it, or is it because its flat out ridiculous. Burke knew that his arbitrary rule on hats cannot survive any legal challenge, probably why he ended up letting the hat stay on. Not sure how a hat disrupts a proceeding, other than when the judge decides on his own whim that it does and hopes no one calls him on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jermaine</title>
		<link>http://freekeene.com/2009/09/09/judge-forgets-his-own-arbitrary-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-82569</link>
		<dc:creator>jermaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekeene.com/?p=3299#comment-82569</guid>
		<description>i laughed out loud. this was great. after what some of the keene activists have gone through with hats and cameras.. this is just hysterical </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i laughed out loud. this was great. after what some of the keene activists have gone through with hats and cameras.. this is just hysterical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

