Free Keene

Peaceful Evolution

The Heartless NH Justice System, and the Bureaucrats Who Run it

Filed under: Hypocrisy, Jailed Activist, Obscured Truth Network, Personal Freedom — SamIam at 5:33 pm on Tuesday, October 20, 2009

While in the Cheshire County Jail, I requested to use the law library on a few occasions to defend myself. The requests were generally approved after anywhere from 3-8 days later after several follow-up requests, and in one case, a petition signed by 20 other prisoners.

Unfortunately the law library at the jail is severely deficient. The New Hampshire RSA set, updated last in ‘94, has volumes missing. They have the RSA’s on one computer, which was down for weeks, but that doesn’t include much useful case law.

The Federal code volumes are from the 50’s and have more volumes missing than on the shelves. The NH court rules haven’t been updated since 1979, and that’s important because they have added hoops to jump through to call witnesses in your own defense, which are not even in the 1979 rules. The Keene city ordinances are nowhere in sight,  and several activists continue to be charged with them.

While in the Jail Richard Van Wickler said it’s not his responsibility, and that I should call the Public Defenders office because they maintain the law library, and they have assured him that it’s up to date.

Today I called and spoke with Jan who has managed the Public Defenders office for over 20 years.

Guess what, they have never been responsible for the law library at the jail. Jan told me the Public Defenders office is a private corporation, and has no formal relationship with the jail.

So then I called Count Attorney, Peter Heed’s office since he has a duty to ensure justice is done in every case before him. I spoke with his assistant Chloe, who got the question into Peter, and guess what. They don’t care either.

So then I called their county commissionerJack Wozmak, who is out of the office all week. His assistant Terry didn’t seem to concerned either.

What kind of people turn the other way while human beings are subjected to a process they don’t understand, not given any means to defend them selves, properly call witnesses, or research case law? (all the while personally profiting from others misfortune)

These people are facing the threat of having several years of their lives taken away, at a cost of over $15,000/year per person to taxpayers! Wouldn’t a compassionate society at least provide them the means to defend themselves?

The RSA’s can be download here.

The Court Rules can be downloaded here.

The Keene Ordinances can be viewed here.

Here’s’s the most basic list of what every Jail law library in NH should contain at a minimum. (put together by a private company)

And yes, this really is a simple as printing them out and putting them in the library or placing a copy on the jail computers.  What excuse could they possibly have for being over 3 decades behind on this? If you are outraged, then take a few minutes to let them know:

Rick Van Whckler, Jail Superintendent: (603) 283-3304

Peter Heed, County Attorney: (603) 352-0056

County Commissioners Homepage and Jack Wozmak’s, County Commissioner’s number (603) 352-8215

I doubt the situation is any different in other counties: John Lynch, “governor”  (603) 352-8215

Please let these people know that they are human beings and so are the “offenders”. Ask them if they would be okay if it was one of their family members being subjected to such treatment.  Do they simply not care, or pretend not to know while profiting off of others’ misfortune? After all, it’s not their loved ones, these people are “offenders” right? As “Captain” Colby told our caging section, “Your inmates, you don’t have rights.” Please take action now, there is no excuse for this.

17 Comments »

Comment by Tumbleweed

October 20, 2009 @ 6:08 pm

I’ve had that sort of runaround between public and private police enterprise where they overlap/work in the same area but don’t want to be questioned. “Call this department, this number” is met with “That’s not our jurisdiction or responsibility, call this number and these people”.. back and forth until you’re eventually lucky enough to actually hear a fax machine sputter tone on the other end (which translated, generally means “a big f-you to you” unless you call back the referring party and they laugh at you on the phone..that’s usually pretty straight forward)

At least you guys have the real numbers. Use them and give the powers that be a piece of your mind.

Comment by AnAmazedReader

October 20, 2009 @ 6:32 pm

The typically incoherent ravings of a violently disordered mind. He argues for greater public resources, yet frequently asserts that the collection of the taxes that would potentially pay for such resources is a form of tyranny and theft. What is the common thread between these opposing views? An adolescent belief that a constant diet of complaint will somehow elevate his meager sense of self-worth and serve as a distraction from the poverty of his inner and outer lives. This isn’t about logical consistency. But don’t worry Sam; in the words of Pope Ian the Unctuous:

We forgive you.

Comment by Eli Rivera

October 20, 2009 @ 6:33 pm

I am AnAmazedReader

Comment by smeg

October 20, 2009 @ 6:41 pm

The typically incoherent ravings of a violently disordered mind. He argues for greater public resources, yet frequently asserts that the collection of the taxes that would potentially pay for such resources is a form of tyranny and theft. What is the common thread between these opposing views? An adolescent belief that a constant diet of complaint will somehow elevate his meager sense of self-worth and serve as a distraction from the poverty of his inner and outer lives. This isn’t about logical consistency. But don’t worry Sam; in the words of Pope Ian the Unctuous:

We forgive you.

The typically incoherent ravings of a violently disordered mind. His accusations are based on the flaws he sees in himself. What is the common thread between these opposing views? An adolescent belief that a constant diet of complaint will somehow elevate his meager sense of self-worth and serve as a distraction from the poverty of his inner and outer lives. This isn’t about logical consistency. But don’t worry AnAmazedReader; in the words of Pope Ian the Unctuous many people here:

We forgive you.

Comment by Tumbleweed

October 20, 2009 @ 6:54 pm

The typically incoherent ravings of a violently disordered mind. He argues for greater public resources, yet frequently asserts that the collection of the taxes that would potentially pay for such resources is a form of tyranny and theft. What is the common thread between these opposing views? An adolescent belief that a constant diet of complaint will somehow elevate his meager sense of self-worth and serve as a distraction from the poverty of his inner and outer lives. This isn’t about logical consistency. But don’t worry Sam; in the words of Pope Ian the Unctuous:

We forgive you.

So you have no issue with authorities spending over a thousand dollars of your tax money each month for every prisoner in their jails (whether ethically placed there or not), but take issue with giving the incarcerated a chance to leave that jail before the end of their costly stint? Not to mention the whole civil liberty angle…Or is logic a moot issue here, and the author of the piece your most immediate concern?

Comment by xrazorwirex

October 20, 2009 @ 8:37 pm

I’m pretty sure that if the current laws were abolished Ian wouldn’t be calling for full disclosure of said laws, however, when you have stacks of arbitrary laws and rules and put people in cages over them, you need to at least disclose what those laws are.

How sick in the head are you, Rivera~ er, AnAmazedReader?

Comment by Tumbleweed

October 20, 2009 @ 9:16 pm

ANAMAZEDREADER is one of the unsympathetic public officials who regularly has handled freestaters in the Keene area? If that is a fact, isn’t odd or even almost a conflict of interest for such a public official to be actively partaking in the comings and goings of this forum and posting crackerjack box psychology comments whilst not identifying himself or his employer as the State of New Hampshire by way of Keene? Conflict of interest? Seems like a dangerously grey area to me. Should it be true, considering the nature of ANAMAZEDREADER’s transparent attempts at trolling/defamation of character/mindgames… would that not be malice? Some sort of intent to do wrong?

Comment by Lpviper

October 20, 2009 @ 9:31 pm

The Socialists say, since the law organizes justice, why should
it not organize labor, instruction, and religion?
Why? Because it could not organize labor, instruction, and
religion, without disorganizing justice.
For remember, that law is force, and that consequently the
domain of the law cannot properly extend beyond the domain of
force.
When law and force keep a man within the bounds of justice,
they impose nothing upon him but a mere negation. They only
oblige him to abstain from doing harm. They violate neither his
personality, his liberty, nor his property. They only guard the personality,
the liberty, the property of others. They hold themselves
on the defensive; they defend the equal right of all. They fulfill a
mission whose harmlessness is evident, whose utility is palpable,
and whose legitimacy is not to be disputed. This is so true that, as
a friend of mine once remarked to me, to say that the aim of the
law is to cause justice to reign, is to use an expression that is not
rigorously exact. It ought to be said, the aim of the law is to prevent
injustice from reigning. In fact, it is not justice that has an
existence of its own, it is injustice. The one results from the
absence of the other.
But when the law, through the medium of its necessary
agent—force—imposes a form of labor, a method or a subject of
instruction, a creed, or a worship, it is no longer negative; it acts
positively upon men. It substitutes the will of the legislator for
their own will, the initiative of the legislator for their own initiative.
They have no need to consult, to compare, or to foresee; the
law does all that for them. The intellect is for them a useless
encumbrance; they cease to be men; they lose their personality,
their liberty, their property.
————————————
Fredrik Bastiat, The Law, 1850

Comment by Lpviper

October 20, 2009 @ 9:34 pm

When I write my own stuff I say stuff like “retard” so I’ll let Bastiat speak for me tonight

Peace and long Life

Comment by Dave

October 20, 2009 @ 10:15 pm

The law library is just a gesture, something they can point to if anyone asks what they do for prisoners. Of course any lawyer would laugh hysterically if you asked him if it was anywhere near adequate to defend yourself in a real criminal case. Realistically, you need Westlaw access nowadays, many lawyers haven’t opened a book in years.

Law really is its own language and if you aren’t on the inside, you’re on the outside. Nobody who isn’t a bar member can hope to realistically defend themselves or anyone else against the state when they decide to come after you. As somebody who is finishing law school right now, trust me, they really drill that into your head.

Comment by EddiE

October 20, 2009 @ 10:24 pm

Do they have internet access in the jail? If so, why spend the money on physical volumes.

Either way jails should only have climate control, beds, food services and showers/toilet facilities. Everything else is just wasted money.

Comment by Lpviper

October 20, 2009 @ 10:34 pm

Not if you’re being caged before you have been at trial.

In that case you’ll want a law library because heaven knows they’re using at least part of theirs

Comment by Frederick B. Parsells

October 21, 2009 @ 7:41 pm

I was curious about the identity of “ANAMAZEDREADER”. I believe some readers were of the impression that it was/is Eli Rivera or at the least someone involved with the city government. So, I got as close as I could to the source, or at least a person who I knew would have a fairly good idea, and someone with great credibility in all of your eyes if I were to reveal the name and someone with no reason to lie or otherwise fabricate an answer just to please me as to where the posting was originating. I have been advised that the person writing to this site as “ANAMAZEDREADER” is doing so from the wilds of New Jersey. My guess is that it is not Eli or someone in the local apparatus. That’s just a guess mind you. It is likely someone seeking to stir the pot (ooooops!! the cauldron).

Respectfully,

Frederick B. Parsells

Comment by George Donnelly

October 22, 2009 @ 10:28 am

I called, and the mildly interesting audio recording is here:

http://georgedonnelly.com/libertarian/keene-government-gang-care

Comment by JJ

October 24, 2009 @ 3:52 am

Thanks Fred for the info about our troll. I am very curious as well though my sources say North Walpole, NH. O.o

Comment by Kinley

November 8, 2009 @ 10:17 am

The case law and discovery requests in this form/letter might help your cases/lawsuits, Sam. http://www.truebornsons.com/042109%20Rule%2015.2%20Disclosure.pdf It’s from the Border Patrol checkpoint vs. Pastor Steven Anderson case in Arizona.

Comment by paul

November 8, 2009 @ 12:48 pm

Anderson’s awesome, I’ve seen his stuff. Pure guts.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation

Subscribe without commenting