A Reminder To The New Hampshire Supreme Court

February 19, 2012 by Bradley Jardis
Filed under: Corruption, Court, Issues, Jailed Activist, National, New Hampshire, News, Politics, Thuggery

This blog is made pursuant to NH Rules of Professional Conduct 3.6 (c) (2) and (c) (6) as the testimony I am referring to below was given at a public hearing at the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and thus, it is part of a public record. Additionally, the people of New Hampshire should be aware of the danger to the public interest.

As the time approaches where the string of events leading up to State v. Jason Talley becomes more and more public, I would like to remind the New Hampshire Supreme Court (and the news media) that at the “Rule 78” hearing on 12/16/11, (the rule about restrictions of New Hampshire’s Constitution Part I, Article 22 in the court system) that I attended, I stood right in front of you, on camera, and told you exactly how the courts were “inviolably” preserving the right to the freedom of the press in Cheshire County: a crime was committed by a sitting judge and high ranking judicial officials stripped rights away in an attempt to try and change the story.

I was even happy to see the former judge that I used to testify to as a police officer present on the panel. I figured it was beneficial to have someone on the panel who knows I am not a liar.

I spoke the truth, on camera, about the judicial cover-up occurring after Adam Mueller’s illegal arrest and how it ensnared Jason Talley. I was apparently ignored.

As Part II, Article 73-a makes you, the Supreme Court, the boss of all the lower courts in New Hampshire, I hope you are preparing to explain to the public how you were told specifically how a crime was being covered up in Cheshire County by judicial officers you supervise, but apparently did nothing about it.

^— This man spent two days incarcerated for a crime he never committed. He spent two days incarcerated for constitutionally protected activity.

Hold Judge Burke and the other judges who are involved accountable because it is the ethical thing to do… not because politics forces you to do so later.

You’re not above the law… you’re entrusted with it.

enslave keene

Let me unequivically state my desire to see justice against Burke is equall to the desire for a conviction in the related case…. Justice all around!!
C McFreman

A conviction for exercising 1st amendment constitutional rights in defiance of a judges' illegal order handed down for the purpose of an illegal coverup?

Nice.

I guess ol' Ron White was correct, you can't fix stupid.
enslave keene

Oh Mcfreeman, I have so many bridges over beach front property to sell you….
N.H. Sup. Ct.

Sorry, Brad, we're entrusted with the LAW, – AND we're above it…

Our rules have the force of LAW.

So there.

N.H.Sup.Ct.
Keene reader

Mr. Jardis, I have followed your posts on this thread with a lot of interest. But your claims that "anyone" who watches the video would see that a crime was committed: well, I disagree. How many people are angry at judges? Probably everybody who has been in County, or angry at Friend of the Court findings, etc., and some of them are dangerous to self and others, as we saw in Keene before this incident happened. Regardless of how you feel about the hat decision a public official shows up to work to find that someone has been casing his arrival, then asks him questions while following him up the stairs. That's not an interview, and it's disingenuous to say so. It's a kind of ambush. Looks like in the video above you knew that Mr. Ridley was going to interview you, and you agreed to speak with him. That's an interview. I expect to be attacked for saying this, but I actually hope people will think better of it, because it's an obvious point that should be acknowledged, and will certainly come up in the review of your case. Many people on this blog believe there should be no judges, but there are, and their job would be very dangerous indeed if people could run up to them at will. Now you know from your own knowledge, and from other things he's done and said, that Mr. Mueller believes in nonviolence and non-cooperation, and he's not going to physically attack a judge, or maybe even anyone else. Fine. But the judge doesn't know who is coming up to him, and even if he does he doesn't have time to think, he just knows he's being followed. I just am not buying your claims that "it's obvious." Before readers send hate my way, please note that I'm not talking about the hat decision or anything else, just this claim that you can "prove" criminal activity.
Bob Constantine

Thanks for presenting your point of view Keene reader. I'll agree that Judge Burke may not have welcomed the interaction, but he did say something completely untrue. He was not threatened. He used his position to jail a man when it was not warranted. I don't think that should be forgotten.
theKINGofKEENE

It's true that Ademo was waiting in a public place to "interview" Burke-the-Jerk as he came in. What, he has no security? Why doesn't he get let in the back-of-the-building sally port, which the Sheriffs use to bring prisoners into the court?

Much as we would like to find fault with Ademos' tactics, the facts remain that Burke-the-Jerk knows Ademo at least by sight, if not by first name. The real issue truly is Burke-the-Jerk inappropriate reaction. And his LYING. Burke-the-Jerk has a very checkered career in Cheshire County law enforcement. When he was a younger lawyer, he helped a local cop literally get away with murder, by allowing his client – who was one of the best witnesses against that murderous cop – to be branded "mentally ill", and "unfit to testify". Burke-theJerk also, as a County Prosecutor, persecuted, and mis-used his Office, to go after a former local cop who had gotten on the wrong side of other, crooked, local cops.

Burke-the-Jerk has also prosecuted a man who had sex with his daughter, then turned around and as a judge, forced the daughter to take brain-damaging drugs. Again, because she was alledgedly a "mental patient". Burke-the-Jerk was also on the Board of Directors of Monadnock Family(and "Mental Health")Services, and then as a judge he helped start "Mental Health Court", which has as it's largest contractor: Monadnock Family Services. And, one of the key figures responsible for helping create "Mental Health Court" was again, yet another man who had sex with his daughter, then had his daughter sent to a psychiatrist, and labelled "mentally ill", so SHE couldn't testify against him…No, Mr. Burke-the-Jerk's corruption and incompetence runs deep and wide. I'm surprised he was ever accepted as a judge, and more surprised he is still on the bench. I'd like to see Brad & Ademo take some of this material and see that justice is done. Burke should be removed from the bench. And I haven't even STARTED on all the FreeWeenie, "hat-in-court" crap…

“““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““

What do you have to say to THAT, Mr. "Keene reader"…???…
david

fooey
Pingback: A Reminder to the New Hampshire Supreme Court | FreeConcord.org
enslave keene

Damn Bradford, Who you got typing for you?