“City of Manchester” Gang Planning Attacks on UBER Drivers?

In a move that shows the true nature of the state and regulations, the Manchester aldermen voted 10-3 recently to require UBER to obey their “Vehicles for Hire” ordinance which requires background checks, drug testing, and other bureaucratic nonsense. The lie of regulations is that they exist supposedly to protect you, the consumer. However, they actually just protect the established businesses in the given field. In this case, the old-guard cab companies are being protected from the innovative upstart. Regulations keep poor people poor, by making it near-impossible for them to go into business for themselves.

Despite the now possible threat of Manchester police targeting UBER drivers, heroically, UBER has announced they will continue to operate within Manchester and will likely give legal assistance to any drivers the city gang cites for violating the gang’s precious “code” (“Vehicles for Hire” is section 118). It looks like UBER is ready to go to court over this, as has been their tradition in other cities.

Of course, a free place to live would allow anyone to contract with anyone they like for a ride somewhere. The taxi companies should also be free of regulations, not just UBER. Allow the marketplace to come up with standards, if they are necessary. The cab companies will need to be free of regulatory burden to effectively compete against the nimble new competitor, UBER.

UBER’s argument, as I understand it, is they are not a taxicab company, for which all the regulations are written.  UBER does not own any of the cars that its users end up riding in. UBER merely facilitates a smooth transaction between the rider and driver. It’s a matchmaking company. The next step, which may have even UBER worried, is to decentralize ride-sharing even further, to where no company is needed to make the connections between rider and driver. That actually is being worked on now, and it has a terrible name, LaZooz, but the technology is already here (and based in cryptocurrency like bitcoin) – it’s only a matter of time and software development, and participants.

For now though, UBER and other ridesharing competitors like Lyft, are innovating in a way that expands consumer choice, increases service available overall, drives down price, and rewards entrepreneurs. No wonder the city gang wants to stop them! They disrupt the current good ol’ boys network.

State Representative Amanda Bouldin, UBER Customer

UBER is heroic for encouraging the UBER drivers to continue to drive and promising to back them legally. If only more companies would stand up to the oppressive state and its destructive regulations. I had the pleasure of riding in an UBER twice while recently visiting Austin, Texas. It was great! But don’t take my word for it. Here’s what liberty-loving state representative Amanda Bouldin had to say about her glowing UBER experience in Manchester. (Bouldin is also the founder of Shire Sharing.)

If you’re in Manchester and need a ride, give UBER a shot – the first ride’s free when you click this link, and I’ll get a $20 credit on my account. (Smart marketing plan on UBER’s part.) Will UBER defeat the Manchester gang in their own court? Stay tuned here to Free Keene for the latest.