VIDEO: State Representative Dick Marple OWNS District Court Judge

Dick Marple is a military veteran, former cop, and four-term state representative from Hooksett, New Hampshire.

In May of 2016, he was arrested on a warrant for driving with an invalid license and released on $4,000 personal recognizance.

He attended an arriagnment in June (video here) and challenged the court’s jurisdiction among other things, and then was arrested while campaigning on election day, November 9th. Police say he failed to appear at Concord District Court to answer to charges of driving while license suspended and “prohibitions” regarding an allegedly invalid license.

This week, Dick was back in court for a case status hearing, where he let the judge have it, in front of a full courtroom. Here’s the amazing video:

In addition to this court battle, Marple is also facing down the town of Hooksett regarding unpaid property taxes. He’s more than two years past due, and according to the Union Leader, the town government has already “tax deeded” (stolen) his property from him on paper. Now they have to decide to sell the property and throw him from the home that he thought that he owned.

Stay tuned here to Free Keene for the latest from Dick’s legal land odysseys. The suspended driving case is set for trial on January 23rd at 1pm at Concord District Court.

If you enjoy my posts, please sign up for a free account at Steemit, follow my posts there, and vote them up. If you do that, I’ll actually get paid in cryptocurrency for your vote-ups, thank you!

Now you can subscribe to Free Keene via email!

Don't miss a single post!


55 Comments

  1. I see that you’ve gotten WEEDA to call you out on your high-sounding principles, Raymond. You silver-tongued devil! I hope you won’t let this challenge go unanswered, poppet. Why don’t you “shiw” this rascal the meaning of the word respect? Milwaukee and I believe in you.

  2. You should “shiw” Raymond the respect he deserves Drac. After all he is dead on, caro mio.

  3. DRACdouble My goodness, DD darling! More delightful little pictures for everyone to enjoy? Now poppet, I don’t mean to demoralize you by brushing aside all of this fine research you’ve presented to me, but don’t you suppose that there might be a simpler explanation here? I’m surprised that you didn’t notice that our dear friend Raymond also made a similar sort of mistake with his word “vlaim.” I’ll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions as to why dear Raymond typed that. I trust that it won’t require yet another Google search on your part to figure it out, right sweetums?

  4. Dec 2016 blablabla comments up to Dec26th 2016, new trial date in Jan 23rd 2017 blablabla hey, no News on this case in over one year on this Website, that was build to follow the case. Nice nothing u made in constructing this website.

  5. I would love to talk to this gentleman there are a few things that he apparently doesn’t know one of these things is the United States codes Title 18 chapter 306 part 3 subsection 4108 this is where you have to be brought into that corporated courtroom buy all the tricks that they pull if you say USCTitle 18 chapter 306 for 3 subsection 4108 this is where you stay in your ground and not let them take you into their jurisdiction by saying something similar to or I’ve been forced here against my will and you do not have my consent to recite the United States code I’ve never used this before but it is what it says it is there is another action where you can make the judge a temporary Trustee of your birth certificate Bond and just pay all the criminal charges through your birth certificate that they made a bond out of it and if you have 30 years your worth millions of dollars that when you die whoever bought the bar and gets the money YouTube birth certificate Bond I don’t know if either one of these will work but I’ve been researching this thoroughly for a number of years I would like to talk to this gentleman because I to refuse to get a picture on my license in the state of Pennsylvania they decided to give me a religious test against my State Constitution Article 1 Section 3 and 4 and also Article 5 in the Federal Constitution you write them under the right-to-know law in our state and they will not answer you and when you found appeal they say that they’ve done nothing wrong. Sir if you read this I would enjoy talking to you. 1 Wheel car at gmail

Care to comment?