Ian’s Blog from Jail #6

[Transcribed by Mail-to-Jail.]

Ian Freeman

“Keene – Ripe for Political Action”

I was reading the Keene Sentinel this week and was pleased to see liberty activist, Free Keene blogger, and NH native Heika Courser is in the running for the five “at-large” city council seats up for election here in Keene. Sadly though, she is the only liberty activist in the race – not just for the at-large seats, but also for the ward seats. It’s too bad more activists do not take advantage of this ripe opportunity to get the word out about liberty. More on that in a moment.

First, a little detail. In Keene, there are 15 city council seats. Every two years, ten of the seats are up for election. The “at-large” seats are two year terms and there are five of them. The other ten seats are “Ward” seats. Keene has five wards and each ward has two seats. Ward seats are four years each and are staggered, so every two years, five ward seats are available. Keene has a “mayor”, but it’s a ceremonial position. The mayor can only vote in the event of a tie and can assign councilors to committees. The mayor is elected every two years. The only requirements to run for these seats is that one be a registered voter and pay $2 (or $5 for mayor). Alternatively, one can get 50 petition signatures and not have to pay the fee.

The city council has the ability to hire and fire key positions within the corporation known as the “City of Keene”, including the City Manager, City Attorney, and Police Chief. The position of City Manager can hire and fire the entirety of the city staff.

You would think that positions with such influence would attract plenty of candidates who are power-seekers, but you’d be wrong. This year, four out of five ward seats only have one candidate! The five at-large seats are well contested, with eight candidates seeking the five spots. Activists could have, for a mere two dollars, been the only opposition in those races. Instead, the politicos who did file (most are council incumbents) are likely going to walk right into office. It’s even more strange considering the ward races are the easier ones. Ward seats are always less contested and one only needs to focus campaigning to one’s ward, making door-knocking and literature distribution less burdensome than at-large seats.

Poor attendance on the part of the liberty activists ‘t just plague the elections – it stretches across all the political process. Liberty-lovers are rarely seen at committee meetings (where the public can actually speak to the council) or the biweekly city council meetings. To be fair, the two committee meetings in the last year where activists Heika Courser and Nick Ryder were proposing changes to the open container and parking ordinances, respectively, were well-attended by liberty activists, as they were invited to attend. The activists who did come out made great points and allowed the councilors to actually be exposed to the liberty perspective.

Look, this isn’t a problem with just liberty activists – it’s across the board. The only people who attend these meetings in general are local busybodies and bureaucrats. City councilor Cynthia Georgina is constantly complaining about how poorly attended all of their hearings are. Of course, the councilors can interpret the poor attendance as a message that they are doing a good job. Anyone who has actually spoken with Keeniacs knows that is not the case. Many are frustrated by the high property taxes, traffic and poor roads, restrictive business and housing regulations, etc.

So why do so few people bother to get involved? Here is some educated speculation that applies to both average Keeniacs as well as activists for liberty:

  • People are Busy – Many in the liberty activist community are young, and young people tend to be more likely to work at night. If you work evenings, attending the nearly 100% evening city meetings is probably not an option. For those that work during the day a dull city council meeting is probably not how they want to spend their leisure time.
  • Meetings are Boring – If you have ever been, you know why so few people attend. While the open-to-public-comment committee meetings are more lively, the city council meetings are only marginally better than watching grass grow, and far less colorful.
  • Feel Like Councilors Don’t Listen – When passionate liberty-lovers make persuasive, logical points at committee meetings, it can feel like they are falling on deaf ears. If they cote to “table” the issue, meaning do nothing and keep the status quo, it sure can feel like a waste of time.
  • City Bureaucrats’ Opinions Seem More Important to Councilors – Do city councilors treat people with badges and/or official titles with more reverence? It sure feels like it. It doesn’t seem to matter if numbers are on your side. One opinion from the police chief outweighs a dozen os us serfs.

The above are reasons why many who have perhaps had an interest in working inside the system have given up or never bothered trying. In addition to those objections are those of the activists who are against involving themselves in the system for moral reasons, like because they do not feel right to participate in a system that is based on violence or that they do not want to feel like they are begging master for a few scraps of freedom.

All of these reasons are fine reasons to busy oneself with other matters. I get it. Politics does suck. It’s icky and distasteful. That said, the civil disobedience movement is not large enough to result in changes to the system on its own, and as much as we’d like average folks to start noncooperation and not paying taxes, or bureaucrats to stop enforcing bad laws, quit their jobs, and start acting on their conscience and doing the right thing, none of those seems to be imminent. Sure, the federal government might crash and burn someday soon, but that won’t stop people from believing in the most dangerous superstition: “Authority”. Until people’s beliefs change, we’ll never rid ourselves of the decrepit, dangerous idea of “the State”.

Ideas matter, and that’s the number one reason to attend city meetings and run for office, even if you consider yourself an “anarchist”.

Whether you are someone willing to work inside-the-system but feel it’s a waste of time or are morally opposed to it, I’m going to attempt to persuade you to get involved. Also, I’m hoping the clear political opportunities presented here(like elections with only one candidate!) will persuade political activists who’ve yet to move to seriously consider Keene. With a handful of dedicated inside-the-system activists, we’d have the most well-rounded liberty movement anywhere.

Here are the reasons you should get involved, as distasteful as it might be:

  • To Propagate Ideas of Liberty – How many people in our movement today that call themselves anarchists or voluntarists found liberty via a political campaign? Perhaps you? I know I did. For me it was the Harry Browne for President campaign in 2000 that got me hooked. For many others it was Ron Paul in 2008 and he will likely convert more in 2012. Lots of people pay attention to politics and many of them are fed up with their choice – you could be the one to give them new ideas to consider.
  • Free Media Coverage – Buying newspaper, radio, or TV ads is expensive, but as a candidate, you get free coverage for your ideas. The local paper will send you questions and will print your answers. Local talk hosts will likely interview you on radio and TV, else they be considered unfair. OK, so it costs $2 to run for office, but the coverage is worth thousands! By choosing not to run for office, you are just leaving all that exposure on the table!
  • Influencing Politicians – I know, it can seem like the politicians have made up their minds when you speak at a council meeting, but it’s unfair to generalize. Some are more open-minded than others. the people winning inside the system are those who show up. Right now the people showing up are bureaucrats and busybodies. The principled message of liberty is barely present. Also, in regards to campaigns, having principled liberty ideas in a race and influence the general direction of debates and discussion.
  • The Keeniacs are Asking You to Run – They just aren’t ready to disobey. I have been asked – why don’t you guys run for office? The average Keeniacs don’t want to, probably for some of the reasons stated, but many regular Keeniacs want someone worth voting for. That person could be you.
  • More People Watch City Meetings Than You May Think – Right now, every city council meeting is televised live on Cheshire TV and also re-run a few times. Eventually CTV will air all the committee meetings as well. When Keene finally gets a liberty-oriented city councilor, his or her ideas will be televised at every meeting. Once the committee meetings are on-air, then any liberty people who show up to comment will also have their ideas televised.
  • It’s Proven: Politics Can Work In NH – I was a skeptic when I moved here from Florida. I’d assisted with and managed campaigns down there. It felt like banging my head against a brick wall. When I made the move, I was pretty burned out. The political activists said NH was different, but I didn’t really believe it. Five years since my move, it’s been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by the dedicated liberty activists working at the state level. The NH Liberty Alliance (NHLiberty.org) is influencing policy and helping liberty-oriented candidates get elected. Over a dozen free staters are now in NH State Rep seats. That alone is a feat the Libertarian PArt hasn’t accomplished in 40 years! Here liberty candidates have been elected under both of the major parties. Yes, politics is slow. Yes, it’s expensive. But at least it is working. If it can work on the state level, it can work in Keene – if only the activists would bother.

Once activist need not attend all the meetings. There are enough people in the area to where certain people could attend different types of meetings, based on each attendee’s availability. There are only two council meetings per month and the committee meetings each have two per month as well. It’s not a huge burden, but it is a commitment. Oh, and it’s not without risk. When Julia Miranda rand for Ward 4 in 2007 she was threatened with a felony gambling charge for offering to give her council paycheck to voters if she wont the seat. All activism is risky, because it is a threat to the status quo. That said, politics is generally a safer road than civil disobedience.

If I have convinced you to get involved, feel free to drop in to the Free Keene Forum and visit the “Inside-the-System” sub-forum. That’s a good way to meet other interested parties and organize attending meetings. If you have yet to make to move, while there is a two year wait prior to running for state rep, no such wait applies to city council. The next election for city seats is in 2013. If you plan to be involved, start attending meeting ASAP. Meet the “movers and shakers” and get your face and name known Thus far, liberty candidates have garnered 20-25% of the votes in council elections. (We’ve had one candidate each election) That’s pretty good for political newbies. Thus far, neither Julia Miranda or Nick Ryder has attempted a second campaign, so we don’t know if they’d do better with more exposure and name recognition.

As it is with other forms of activism, the political side of things is brand new and virtually untested. Much growth is possible and opportunities are ripe. Can you help?

Now you can subscribe to Free Keene via email!

Don't miss a single post!


Subscribe
Notify of
guest


170 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David

sounds like a righteous cause.
very cool

Bob C

Good luck with this Brad! I appreciate your doing this. As an aside, and possibly of use to you in your quest…I was informed many years ago by a judge that the NH Supreme Court had changed the common meaning in one of the wordings from the alleged NH bill of rights. Article 15 in the NH alleged bill of rights states a defendant has the right to be “fully heard” by himself and counsel (presumably his lawyer). When trying to use that alleged right, I was informed in that instance the word, “and” had been changed to mean “either… Read more »

clymer

Looking forward to the updates, Brad. You’re a rare and restorative individual and NH is lucky to call you one of our own

David

the laws one of my favorite subjects.
I heard that some states you can be an apprentice if a law firm will take you as an apprentice, and by being apprentice you can become a lawyer and then just take the bar test.
this is just going by my Dusty memory but maybe Louisiana is one of those States.
I just did a Google search.
i guess that’s not what you were talking about but…
by this cursory search says there is six States https://www.google.com/search?q=what+states+can+you+become+a+lawyer+by+apprenticeship&oq=what+states+can+you+become+a+lawyer+by+apprenticeship&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDY1NjZqMGo3qAIAsAIA&client=ms-android-americamovil-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Last edited 1 year ago by David
Wrongway

Another ridiculous article. Do you honestly believe the state will take the bar away? Are you aware the bar is the governing entity over licensed lawyers. They set the ethics, self governing, watch dogs over lawyers so there is no dishonesty, fraud, etc. To be a member of the bar, several things are needed. Today, each U.S. jurisdiction has its own rules which govern admission to its bar. Generally, admission to a bar requires that a candidate does the following: Earn a Juris Doctor degree or read law Pass a professional responsibility examination or equivalent Pass a bar examination (except where diploma privilege is allowed) Undergo a character and… Read more »

wrongway1

I have never heard of you representing anyone in court. Was it for a parking fine? Ademo never had his rights violated. He has a rap sheet a mile long. He fled Keene because he was going to be arrested. He was convicted of wire tapping. Ademo is not a freelance journalist. He can’t even spell his own name for the most part. He doesn’t have a degree. The most respected writers have college degrees. Freekeeners latched on to the “journalists” misnomer because the word is vague. Every time the freekeeners hassled the police they started with the “I’m a… Read more »

clymer

jj, with respect I ABSOLUTELY agree with the premise of the article. The average person charged with a crime walks into a court and they are basically facing a good ole boys club of opposition, including the lawyers (especially if they are public defenders). Your average cops, lawyers, judges individually are usually great people with a fair opinion of constitutional justice. When you get them together in a court room, they are operationally working together with a trusted rapport of familiarity with each other as if defending their own personal career space. A public defender in this environment can quickly… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by clymer
wrongway1

Whil I wait for approval, this article is a fluff piece with no realistic plan to make it true.

David

i think your brain is fluff

David

I know I should take the high road like high line he’s a good example but He hasn’t been here for a while like and had like long-term experience with this guy… I realize I should do something besides just Insult. I realize that I understand that but why shouldn’t I denounce The perpetuation of garbage… Garbage that poisons the conversation.. I understand I’m glad high line is here he takes the high road Very opposite from me I take the low road I Get in the gutter with the gutter people… When people are civil and behave properly and… Read more »

David

Yes.. I’m just saying that maybe I should try to avoid the low road.. (that I take so much, lol)

The law's one of Dave's favorite subjects.

I know, right?

Jeepers. Ya know, this kind of reminds me of that one time when I took the high road and stuff and like totally made a New Year’s resolution and stuff to like totally stop making fun of Karl being such a total nancy-boy and stuff. I mean I just took that high road and stuff and just never looked back and stuff. Too bad Jacks could never do that cuz he’s such a total libtard dickfart and stuff, am I right Dave? 😉

I guess statists have taken over since Ian left.
That’s pretty disrespectful to someone who created the site and went to prison for complete freedom.
It’s very disrespectful.
Later

Last edited 1 year ago by David
Dave just did a Google search.

Uh huh. God us statists like totally suck, don’t we Dave? I’ll bet ya’d just grind us up with the back tire of your Honda and stuff if ya ever got the chance to and stuff, am I right? I’m not scared of ya though, Dave. Mostly cuz you have absolutely no idea where I live and stuff cuz I’m like totally streetwise and stuff and like totally know to never, ever, ever put my name on the internet and stuff cuz crazy weirdos like you might try to murder me in my sleep and stuff. Yay for me, huh?… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Dave just did a Google search.
wrongway1

Afraid of identifying myself? looking at this group of people on this site, there is a lot more people trying to keep their identities from being known. Ian has changed his last name, Adam Mueller changed his name to Ademo, and so on.

Why would I want to post my name? So a bunch of burnt out freekeeners can march around my clinic harassing my patients and harassing my employees? You see, I do have a respectful job. You don’t need to know my name anymore that I need to know you name.

THE ANTIFA GHOST

You have JJ at a disadvantage though. Because on his side are sane people with jobs, family, and hobbies that don’t have time to play activist.

The FKers on your side? They have all the time in the world to “protest”, and harass others, like has been shown time and time again on this very website.

clymer

c’mon karl. If American history was one long exercise in obedient servitude to institutions of power, the structure of government would have long ago devolved into a fascistic control grid (..granted, we’re almost there). Besides, what about your “fiery but mostly peaceful” protesters that share that special belongingness with “ANTIFA”? They don’t seem like the corporate conformists that place priority on their property tax bill over personal feelings of social injustice

THE ANTIFA GHOST

I didn’t say I had a problem with protestors. I am arguing very narrowly here that anonymity is important on this site given the possibility of harassment from FKers.

AD Director Marx

Me too. I must say I prefer your method of communication, even if I disagree. Prior to you entering the picture, I distinctly remember numerous conversations other libertarians had with Ian and crew about tactics and optics of their messaging. The best way to go about “winning hearts and minds” so to speak. Ian and others like him were of the opinion to say nothing and just let people be assholes, harassing meter maids, crossing guards, county clerks, and anybody else they thought they could bully. Of course, FKers always gave the slimy justification that they can treat people that… Read more »

Real Karl supposes it could even be a mix of both.

Uh huh. You know, cuz you libtard weirdos’ slimy way of forcing the rest of us to like pay you guys to like own us and stuff is just like the best way of doing things like just ever and stuff, am I right Karl? 😉 I mean jeepers, Karl, I don’t know what I’d do without you guys like telling the rest of us normal folks like just how much we like totally need you and stuff and like just how awesome a job you’re doing and stuff and like how society’s gears would just like just totally grind… Read more »

Starchild

Do you also think the American colonists were “assholes” for “harassing” British officials? That they should have instead just meekly accepted the statist narrative that those officials had the right to control their lives in various ways, including extorting money via taxes (something that parking meters serve to do today)?

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Do you really think this comparison is equivalent? Are you hoping to have a violent revolution over meter maids Starchild?

THE ANTIFA GHOST

With respect to parking meters: the way I see it, what right do you have to park your private property on the street? Everybody owns that road, not just you. It sounds like you’re unjustly enriching yourself at everybody else’s expense. If you’re going to monopolize the space, you owe everybody else a use fee for depriving them of that space.

Starchild

Far less offensive or “slimy” than the “you are a taxpayer, so I own you” energy often shown by statists, which is a lot more oppressive since it has the power and violence of The Law™ behind it.

Starchild

“…the possibility of harassment from FKers”.

That’s rather rich, coming in defense of someone who is completely opposed to what FreeKeene stands for and just comes here to troll (i.e. harass people).

THE ANTIFA GHOST

I resent that characterization. I am a half-troll. Sometimes I come in good faith, other times I come to make fun of you all. Usually it depends on who I am responding to.

Starchild

As if your moral, financial, and voting in support of government violations of the life, liberty, and property of others is not a worse form of harassment than just about anything someone associated with Free Keene would be likely to do to you!

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think you’d be leading the charge here on this. Still, given that the people on this site have a documented history of harassment (including Ian, by the way) don’t you think that is reason enough to be anonymous here?

Starchild

As if passing and enforcing government laws that violate people’s human and civil rights doesn’t count as a “history of harassment” on anyone’s part!

Starchild

You’re kidding, right? Jumping Jacks (aka wrongway1) seems to have LOTS of time to “play activist” (your term – I think being an activist for a good cause is one of the most serious and noble things you can do in life) and voice his opinions in this forum – mostly by attacking and disparaging those who care about freedom.

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Making a comment on an online forum is a lot easier than physically going out. It takes what, a minute tops to write something out? Easily done during breaks.

Starchild

This refrain about people who “don’t have time to play activist” is an old and tired one. I can’t count how many times I’ve heard non-activists make comments like these in an effort to dismiss activists and their efforts. Living in a region where most people are politically on the left and activism tends to reflect this, I most often hear such complaints voiced against left-wingers (often by right-wingers who are quite statist and not necessarily contributing much of meaning to society themselves!), but they sound much the same when voiced by a leftist like “Antifa Ghost” against libertarians. If… Read more »

Starchild

People who are rude and unpleasant to others online definitely have more incentive to want to keep their identities from being known. Like Dave, I appreciate you taking the high road and being civil.

Jacks sits on policy-making committees.

God you just totally get it, Jacks. About all that posting anonymously and stuff, I mean. Not that bullshit about you owning drug-rehabilitation clinics and stuff and having employees and stuff and totally being a doctoral candidate and stuff cuz everyone knows you made that all totally up and stuff. But still. 😉

wrongway1

Sounds like you are jealous as usual. If you don’t believe I have a rehab center not “centers” who cares. It’s your choice to be ignorant not me. The rest of your comments are your same BS I have read over and over. I have no time to continue answering your BS jabs and pokes. You choose to be an Ignoramus.

Jacks' findings are submitted to the CDC and FDA.

Uh huh. Got it, Jacks. Got it.

One treatment center. Just one. And only one. Ever. Never two or three or four and stuff.

Just the one. And only the one. Cross your heart and hope to die, am I right Jacks? 😉

clymer

JJ, of all the people associated with FK, Brad is about the least likely I have seen that anyone should have a problem with. Besides that, I doubt any FK’ers would have an interest in protesting your clinic. Look at all of the trolling that I do and I had a handful of them over my place to help me stand a couple of gable ends for a garage I framed up a couple years back -you might have known Lumpy, he was a spirited activist, get him near a firepit with a couple of beers and some smoke and… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by clymer
Starchild

The allegation that changing your name means you’re trying to keep your identity from being known is rather silly. A name change is just that – a name change. Whether someone tries to keep their name from being associated with one’s actual person or not is a totally different issue from changing their name.

The people you’re criticizing are posting under the same names online that they use publicly in real life. You are not. See the difference?

Apostle Prophet Mark

Change your Status or you are a slave and have no standing as U.S. Citizen slave subject to a dead Queen, they have us all in probate court bound up deceased and bound by witchcraft blood sacrifices in Depart us all from DOS Department of State travel Passports and DOD Department Ment to depart us all from Defense DOJ Depart us from Jesus Justice  DMV DOS Depart us all from Estate State National status by State of State INC., list us all  As enemy combatants war criminals calling 911 making war on each other. Have us all listed  as lost… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Apostle Prophet Mark
Apostle Prophet Mark

God bless you, we would do well to use our whole Family Christian given names take them back from Satan, thank God for you and your family raising you up in the way God said we should go and so for trusting in God, passing Gods love to comments section. Thank God we are in America a Christian Country of many Nations Ecclesia’s Called Out Ones, who stand for Gods inalienable rights freedom to speak the gospel of peace as Gods spirit directs. These many Nations / men came out of Egypt lies taxes slave traders courts as Abraham, led… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Apostle Prophet Mark
Apostle Prophet Mark

The gospel of peace is: How that God sent His only Begotten Son to die for our sins who had no sin in him, sent him to take us back from death by his Son who died was buried and God saw that good (God is a seer Apostle Prophet), and raised him the Third Day from the depths of slave traders courts alive in all power and authority of God in you who believe that power of God for our salvations.

Bear Arms

I support your cause. I believe that every man should have the “right to counsel,” (Art. 15) and that he has an indefeasible right to choose his own counsel — whether or not that choice is a bar licensed attorney; and that this right applies to both criminal and civil actions. The right to counsel is merely a natural extension of all power being derived originally from the people (Art. 8), and of course we the people have a right to decide who to hire for our assistance. But, I must respectfully disagree with “Attacking RSA 311:7,” and instead suggest… Read more »

Starchild

That’s a lot of wording and legal citations, but if you’re defending government officials having the power to restrict who can practice law, as it sounds to me from reading your remarks (please correct me if I’m wrong), I’m not quite seeing a coherent argument for this. You seem to understand that the ability to limit access to the legal profession, while nominally to protect the vulnerable, may be readily abused by those in power. You also seem to recognize that people have the constitutional right to voluntarily obtain the counsel of their choice to represent them. I think Brad’s… Read more »

TJ The Spy

Strangely, when I saw “Attacking RSA-3117” I thought you were going to talk about attacking the RivestShamirAdleman (RSA) public key encryption scheme with a 3117-bit modlus n, and I was like “Shit! The NSA has been busy if it can factor a 3117-bit modulus n in its prime decomposition p and q in anything less than a trillion years!”

clymer

I worked for RSA for 7 years. They put me through the CISSP exam, gave me a security clearance which I used to get me a gig a large defense contractor making the good bux. (bailed when they mandated the clot shot. None for me, thanks). RSA was good to me, but no one I know is there any more, they got bought out by some hedge fund, started cutting heads and salaries, closed the bedford woods office. Best 7 years of my career

TJ The Spy

I wrote a poem about RSA back in October 2002 and had it published in Mathematics Magazine (Volume 75, Number 4) under my name at the time to help you and others remember it for their exams: Proof by Poem: The RSA Encryption Algorithm Take two large prime numbers, q and p. Find the product n, and the totient ?. If e and ? have GCD one and d is e‘s inverse, then you’re done! For sending m to the e mod n gives secre-c. Note: The version above is what I actually submitted for publication to Mathematics Magazine, which… Read more »

clymer

LOL, bro your brain is bigger than mine. I barely passed CISSP and to be totally honest, i’m surprised they gave me a clearance (went from high school dropout, house framer to support monkey for the fortune 50’s, trust me i ain’t all that)

Bob C

I like math too!

If you had zero right to do something and a bunch of other people had zero right to do the same thing and you added up ALLLLL that zero right using magical legislation, what would the sum be?

I think it would still be zero right to do that something, but admittedly, I’ve never been published in Math Magazine and possess little magic.

THE ANTIFA GHOST

I’d say you should check your premises.

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Well, it was fun supporting you while it lasted. No, I can’t support removing minimum standards for attorneys and flooding our courts with ignorant dipshits that don’t even know the fundamentals of law let alone the specific procedural rules for each court. The courts already move slow enough. Or worse, an uneducated lawyer that doesn’t know that certain arguments, objections, or appeals need to be made at certain points in the process, thereby screwing their client down the line. Also, the state mandating minimum requirements protects people from unethical charlatans that would step in and promise to get them off… Read more »

clymer

I think that they are already allowed to? (a person of good moral character that doesn’t make a habit of it), beyond that anyone can represent themselves(?) I think you’re taking it too seriously, karl. watching a dipshit represent him or herself might potentially be about the most comical part of the trial 🙂

clymer

I mean ..tell me you wouldn’t stand in line for tickets to watch wazoo represent someone 🙂

I could crack a beer and watch a defense that starts with “vaxx and spammed her fear to spread pushing daisies and physics girls were spaming vaxx onto the people where the cures kill too. your spam is my activism so stay ignorant of the “science!” Blocked by both the NH Free State Project and the NH Libertarian Party Twitter accounts. #FREEDUMB”

clymer

karl likes to tout his “i know better than you and oh by the way I am also morally in the right” opinions, but if you read between the lines, most of his convictions have a common undertone of elitism. i.e. “flooding our courts with ignorant dipshits that don’t even know the fundamentals of law” yeah, karl, like that is a genuine risk with this proposal, LOL. 99.999% of those charged with a criminal offense would make ZERO behavioral changes in terms of selecting a bar-registered Juris Doctor vs. a non-qualified representative because they are not interested in criminal conviction.… Read more »

THE ANTIFA GHOST

The courts already get sovereign citizen types that make a fool out of themselves. Some even get posted here, like that one loud retarded fellow Clubfoot or whatever his name is. So yes, making it explicitly legal will make it worse.

Now you’re shifting the goalpost by saying that experienced LEO should be able to be an attorney. That’s not what Brad is proposing. I also disagree in that case as well. Just because you’ve been in the courtroom giving testimony doesn’t make you an expert in litigation.

clymer

You mean “Man-bun McBrain-damage”! LOL

THE ANTIFA GHOST

So your response to the standards being insufficient is to remove the standards? That doesn’t make sense. How do you figure that will fix the problem? Why not propose more stringent standards instead?

clymer

I agree (and with you karl) that some of those sovereign citizens that get up and argue a defense are painfully obscure and esoteric (bordering on nonsensical), but in every case I have seen the judge reign them in very quickly and besides, trying to make a point this way appears to be generally more harmful, than helpful to a defense. These occurrences are very few and far between. I don’t see how this proposed change could impact the courts in any meaningful / substantial way, particularly since the proposal really doesn’t change anything (again, the current statute allows for… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by clymer
AD Director Marx

Often I see the opposite, where the judge gives the sov. cit. a wide berth to make their argument because they are pro se and the judge doesn’t want to be perceived as violating their right to due process.

I suppose if judges are allowed to swiftly remove non-lawyer representatives that make these kind of arguments then I would be one step closer to agreeing with it.

Starchild

If a defendant raising a “sovereign citizen” defense is being charged in a case (like Ian Freeman’s) in which they did not actually violate anyone else’s life, liberty, or property, my sympathy is entirely with them, regardless of the sophistication or lack thereof with which they make their arguments. They may not know the law, and may make fools of themselves in the eyes of the elitists who are familiar with it and hold it sacrosanct, but as far as I’m concerned the fact remains that The Law™ is not sacrosanct, and individuals are sovereign – that is, they have… Read more »

clymer

With respect, the premise of the article is not about pro se arguments on behalf of oneself in legal proceedings, but about using representation that otherwise has not met the traditional requirements of the profession. I do not believe that a Juris Doctor degree and admission to the bar granting permission to practice law should be a requirement. HOWEVER, as someone who grew up in New England an hour south of where I live now, I can tell you first hand how traditional and respectful New Englanders prefer to remain and so it pains me to watch buffoonery from the… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by clymer
clymer

I agree. I have never met him, but his friends support him 100% and that kind of loyalty says a lot. The greatest uneasiness I have really centers around his statements about his position on age of consent, citing his own experiences as a 10 year old boy. It creeps me right the fuck out. To defend his participation as voluntary with a 16 year old post-pubescent predator, to me suggests that he has not come to rational terms with what happened to him. I am picturing some skinny, dark haired kid on a florida street that needed an older… Read more »

THE ANTIFA GHOST

“Ian did meet his KYC requirements” People here keep saying this, but no, he didn’t. All he did is collect information about his customers. While it is true that KYC requires the collection of that info, that is only one part of following KYC regulations. The other part is to register with the government and report suspicious transactions. After all, what good is it to collect information just for it to sit on a random hard drive? You may as well not have collected it for all the good it will do. Case in point, the games Ian played with… Read more »

Bob C

Your post calls into question, what is the culpability of people for the actions of others. That is a good question.

Apparently you think Ian bears some responsibility for what other people may have done with something purchased thru him?

Would you be in favor of “arresting the State of NH” for selling alcohol to people while knowing that alcohol will cause death, destruction, despair, disease, drunk driving and down right devastating dip shittery ?
(alliteration Tourettes today…please forgive me)

Genuinely interested in your thoughts on my question.

AD Director Marx

If it was nearly guaranteed that alcohol does all of those things to people, then sure. But it doesn’t. Most people use it responsibly. Speaking of drunks, did you know that it is a crime to sell alcohol to somebody visibly inebriated in NH? The store employees can get in trouble if they sell to minors too! Heck, if they have a suspicion that an adult is going to give the alcohol to a minor, they have an obligation not to sell. Look at that, culpability for the actions of others! Now let’s look at Ian – While some people… Read more »

Bob C

So when a person DOES “use alcohol irresponsibly”, maybe causes a death, you do or don’t think the State should be held accountable?

AD Director Marx

If the state knew or could reasonably foresee that an alcohol sale would lead to death, then sure. If not, then no.

Bob C

If a person sold alcohol in defiance of a State edict, I think we know THAT alcohol sale could lead to death don’t we? <smirk>

Are you saying the State has never sold alcohol that DID lead to a death? Do you think they’re busy prosecuting themselves in those cases?

THE ANTIFA GHOST

“If a person sold alcohol in defiance of a State edict, I think we know THAT alcohol sale could lead to death don’t we? <smirk>” Not necessarily. What is your point? “Are you saying the State has never sold alcohol that DID lead to a death? Do you think they’re busy prosecuting themselves in those cases?” No, I am not saying that. I’m saying the state should only be culpable if they know or a could reasonably foresee that the sale would lead to death. I have no idea if that circumstance has happened or has been publicized, but they… Read more »

Starchild

As if being elderly is equatable to being drunk!

clymer

Rather than getting stuck in the weeds of hypothetical comparisons, i’ll quote Ed Snowden: “right and wrong is a very different standard than legal and illegal” -in Ian’s case, a jury of his peers decided that what he did was illegal (and wrong) and I think I can guess why. Taking the case of Mary Hurd (I think was her name?) into consideration, there were three parties involved in the transaction, 1.) The Nigerian scammer, who knew he committing a scam, 2.) Mary Hurd, who didn’t know she was being scammed (but was probably hoping for a large payout) and… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by clymer
Bob C

I’m with you on that! FBI = Federal Bureau of Ingestion! Investigate and arrest those cashiers who coerce people to buy “food” that is bad for them!!

If we can save just one life!!!

Bob C

I appreciate that you on the one hand, want to alter the forcible court system monopoly. A little puzzled why you would then, on the other hand, want to embrace other kinds of forcible monopoly. Also, I would have appreciated at least a guffaw…Federal Bureau of Ingestion, c’mon man! That’s funny! Abolish? All peaceful people have the right to make their own choices. I have no problem with people wanting to join organizations that have different goals and/or methods than I do, as long as those goals and methods don’t trample on the rights of others. I also appreciate that… Read more »

clymer

“Federal Bureau of Instigation” Entrapment appears to have become SOP. Planting folks all over J6, sending folks to crypto meetups, meddling in political campaigns, staging gubernatorial abduction attempts, c’mon Brad. They have 60,000 people. This organization is the epitome of weaponized deep state and more corrupt than at any other point in its’ history. I am not sure it can even be cleaned up with the right leadership, at this point. Are there decent people employed bu the FBI? Sure there is. I bet every one of them struggles between quitting and restoring their soul / living a guilt free… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by clymer
clymer

You know, I almost went FBI. Applied after 9-11 and after I graduated with my B. Sc. from U-Mass Lowell, long before I had a clue about the true nature of the way the world works. weeks after applying, I got a small postcard in the mail to show up at the FBI building in Boston, specific date and time. I show up and take a few hours worth of psych evals. A few weeks after that, I get another notice in the mail, “congrats you passed the first battery of tests” or something similar, The next step was to… Read more »

clymer

The funny follow up to this: I have a friend who is a TOTAL LEFTIST (literal closet communist, we agree on basically nothing, but we are like siblings in a weird sense), she has more degrees than a thermometer, father was a university professor, she is a lawyer (in MA), graduated with advanced foreign policy degree from tufts, etc. Always been really into global politics, but I always got the sense that she is attracted to power positions like this, like a moth to a flame, because it lends (perceived) power over other people, always made me a little nauseous.… Read more »

Starchild

Please ask yourself this, Brad: If these “kind”, “polite”, and “nice” FBI agents had been told you were doing something “illegal” that they judged to be within their professional purview, even if you were not harming anyone else, would they have been willing to use violence or the threat of violence to steal your resources or kidnap you and put you in a cage, using as much force as necessary to get you to comply, up to and including killing you if you effectively resisted? Or if they would not have acted in such a manner toward you – perhaps… Read more »

Bob C

So, if you sell twinkies to a fat mom, with a chubby kid in tow, there should be some kind of culpability if the kid shows up a few months later 3 sizes bigger with a dull corn syrup glaze in his eye? You don’t think the cashier did enough by saying, “hey mom, do you really think your kid needs that twinkie?” You think the cashier should have said, “Mrs Very Large Mom, I’m afraid, all I can sell you some celery and carrot sticks! You’re scamming your kid! ” About how many years in jail would be enough… Read more »

clymer

I’m not certain that this represents the best analogy. Maybe it would be more analogous if the mom was TELLING the kid that the twinkies were really carrot sticks that would allow him to see for two miles unaided by a lens and lift a fully grown horse above his head, while secretly knowing that they would not only do neither, but would actually result in the corn syrup-glazed, far away stare – WHILE the cashier heard the entire tale from the mom and KNEW both that it was a lie, and ALSO KNEW that the chubby kid DIDN’T KNOW… Read more »

Starchild

I don’t think your revised example is more analogous Clymer, because the scam victims who bought cryptocurrency from Ian to pay their scammers were not children, but legally independent adults fully responsible for their own actions.

But even if this hypothetical scenario happened exactly as you describe, no way do I think the cashier should be violently raided, have their property confiscated, and spend years in jail for selling the Twinkie.

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Good points. I distinctly recall all of those being made by multiple people in multiple ways a decade ago. Libertarians who held those opinions were cast out as authoritarians trying to control the freedom movement. Like, just let people do whatever they feel is right, man. Then, assholes came and shat over everything. lol

Intrigare

The philosophy that we follow isn’t specifically Ian’s philosophy. That is, it didn’t originate with him. It’s mostly about the NAP, self-ownership, the golden rule, peace, etc. Ian from what I can tell puts it in practice. Ian stated he’s glad he and the guy who he gave sexual favors at a young age didn’t go to jail. You can argue all day that Ian is defending a predator… but if you step away from present-day societal norms for a moment, isn’t it a worthwhile question to ask who better than Ian can determine whether Ian was victimized? Cringe and… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Intrigare
AD Director Marx

“isn’t it a worthwhile question to ask who better than Ian can determine whether Ian was victimized?” And the answer that is anybody with a brain can make that judgement. If Ian wants to delude himself that he had a great time as a coping mechanism, then so be it. It doesn’t change that he was manipulated and victimized when he was a child, nor does it make it okay for kiddy diddlers to diddle kids like Ian believes. By the way, this applies to other crimes too. If I rob a dementia patient, did I commit a crime if… Read more »

Starchild

He could have registered for free as a money transmitter and pay his taxes. That’s what it would have took to resolve this.

Which just shows the moral bankruptcy of the system that persecuted him, because of course neither of those actions would have made any difference in terms of preventing any of the victims from being scammed.

Intrigare

“It doesn’t change that he was manipulated and victimized when he was a child” Ian is not delusional and he doesn’t have dementia. If Ian says he wasn’t, then I’m inclined to believe it. “nor does it make it okay for kiddy diddlers to diddle kids like Ian believes.” No one has said this is okay. Karl the half-troll strikes again? “You can bring a horse to water and all of that. Keep telling yourself that the evidence isn’t blatantly obvious in the court record.” The only thing that is blatantly obvious is that the FBI had an axe to… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Intrigare
THE ANTIFA GHOST

“No one has said this is okay. Karl the half-troll strikes again?”

Ian wants the age of consent removed. Point-blank, he does think this is okay. All the pedo apologia you’ve been writing makes me wonder if you think it’s okay too. Otherwise why bring up the historic shit as if it’s relevant to anything?

“The only thing that is blatantly obvious…”

Given that everybody here appears to be able to see this but you, I’d say it’s blatantly obvious that you have your head in the sand on this one.

Intrigare

‘Otherwise why bring up the historic shit as if it’s relevant to anything?’ Hmm maybe you’re right Karl. Maybe everyone throughout all of history who thought marriage at puberty was okay was just because they were all pedos and stuff. That’s not ignorant at all, not one bit. “Given that everybody here appears to be able to see this but you, I’d say it’s blatantly obvious that you have your head in the sand on this one.” Idk I think there’s a few others, but don’t even bother trying with you because of that half-troll side and stuff. Ha when… Read more »

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Still waiting to hear why it is a relevant point to bring up other than you trying to normalize it.

Intrigare

There are many ways to show that someone who questions or opposes age-of-consent laws aren’t automatically pedophiles or child predators or whathaveyou. Talking about history was the most obvious and convenient way for me to make that point. But if that’s still lost on you I just don’t know what to tell you… other than try trolling less and understanding more.

AD Director Marx

Ian’s public opinions combined with his dating history tell another story there, bud.

What happened in the past isn’t relevant here.

Karl supposes that’s better than having his brain.

Jeepers. You said it, Karl. Boy those pedophiles sure do like totally suck and stuff, huh? Especially that Joe Biden guy.

Don’t believe me? Here’s the Bidenator like totally sniffing away at Mitch McConnell’s nieces and stuff.

comment image

Yowsers. I mean look at ’em all. Just grinning away even while the shit’s like totally going down and everything and stuff. Now that’s just bad parenting and stuff, am I right Karl? 😉

Last edited 1 year ago by Karl supposes that’s better than having his brain.

Now Silvia, are you sure that’s relevant? That happened in the past and stuff. Just saying.

Karl's saying the state should only be.

I know, right? God. What’s with these libtard weirdos like totally living in the past and stuff? Especially when they could be living in the present and stuff in like the happiest place on earth? And I’m not talking about Disneyland either, Intrigare. No siree, Bob. I’m talking about Canada. God it’s so awesome there. And their politicians care so much about children and stuff that they drew up this super-sweet bill and stuff to like totally protect them from like pornography and stuff. Oh, and then they snuck in an amendment and stuff that like totally penalizes “hate crimes”… Read more »

Intrigare

Uh huh. Past isn’t relevant. Got it.

AD Director Marx

As it relates to Ian’s creepy opinions in this context, yes.

Starchild

Do you ask the same question of anti-libertarians who bring up the issue in order to attack libertarians like Ian and try and normalize a witch-hunt mentality?

Starchild

No, Intrigrare is correct. The FBI, or at least certain people in it, were out to get Ian and libertarian/free state activists, and Ian’s views on age of consent are completely irrelevant to this fact. Every anarchist, if they are consistent, wants such laws abolished. It doesn’t mean we want children to be harmed. And yes, the people involved in a particular situation are better able to say whether such harm occurred or not than is some government official being incentivized with power and a State paycheck to find victims whether they really exist or not (or create them if… Read more »

clymer

look, man I have never met Ian and certainly would not want anyone to be attacked in prison. I have been donating to the FSP monthly for at least a decade, so any movement that advances freedom for human beings and restricts the ability of government to act tyrannically against the people that it is supposed to serve, i’m down with. What I ain’t down with, is rationalizing destructive and harmful behavior. I grew up in a very fucked up world and saw much from a very young age. I have seen, with both peers and family members, the tragic… Read more »

Intrigare

We agree. And I believe Ian Freeman would agree with you also.

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Based on what?

Intrigare

Based on my limited observations of him over the years, what I’ve seen him say and do and his response or lack thereof to haters like you. He seems to adhere to the golden rule, which is basically what clymer is talking about and basically what the NAP and self-ownership is all about. Now shoo troll.

Starchild

A post-pubescent 16 year old is not an “undeveloped kid”, and as Ian’s case makes clear, for a teenage boy to have sex at that age will not necessarily cause a “lifetime of damage”, etc. Claiming otherwise is irrational fear-mongering.

Some human laws may arbitrarily declare that adulthood magically occurs on one’s 18th or 21st birthday or whatever, but that’s not how nature actually works.

Bob C

 “that is, they have the right to live as they choose so long as it does not involve initiating force or fraud against others”. Exactly Star Child, nice point! For sure, the fork in the road for “laws” is those which protect the right you mention above and those which violate it. At the risk of channeling Capt. Obvious, I’ll mention those laws which violate rights, are only tools used to manipulate and subjugate people, make sure “the right people” make money, etc. Of course, people need ways to resolve actual crimes, but when the law itself and the enforcement… Read more »

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Why not just hire an attorney from a different jurisdiction to represent you pro hac vice? In that case, they don’t need to play nice with the prosecutor and judge.

Also, if the court is as corrupt as you are suggesting, how will this help? Won’t the Good Ole Boys Club just go harder on non-professionals?

Last edited 1 year ago by THE ANTIFA GHOST
Bob C

I think there are many judges who BELIEVE they are doing the right thing, but they’d wilt, obfuscate or get angry in an actual equal footing argument with somebody when asked why their judgements “enforce laws” rather than render actual justice. Believing in or knowing what is “the right thing”, but still enforcing victimless crime laws regardless, does not imbue those judges with integrity. It reveals the lack of integrity. People who. as a condition of employment, “obey authority” are generally not people I would want to render justice, since their interest isn’t aligned with justice, it’s aligned with blind… Read more »

Starchild

Well said, Bob.

clymer

If freekeene had a party…

https://files.catbox.moe/alzefd.mp4

David
Last edited 1 year ago by David
clymer

i’m glad that these willing borrowers of money used to obtain advanced degrees in ideologically-driven subjects that don’t appear to help them locate gainful employment, don’t have to pay back the money they borrowed (willingly). And just when we thought uncle Joe couldn’t get any more benevolent in his advanced age, he even lets the banks that lent the money off the hook! After all, why make them shoulder the burden of these loans when American tax payers have pockets plenty deep enough to take care of it. After all, we need the banks! Especially if they are too big… Read more »

Starchild

It’s a two-fer – essentially buying votes at the same time it incentivizes more people to attend universities where they will likely be subjected to a barrage of leftist/statist indoctrination.

David

Since Ian has left a more stateist faction has taken over this admin jobs of FreeKeene

Like I said before “when the cat’s away, the statist mice will play” I guess.

It’s totally disrespectful to everything Ian stood for and freedom.
It’s really a defilement and slander of freedom, freekeene and Ian

Last edited 1 year ago by David
THE ANTIFA GHOST

Dave is probably the best troll here. He supports Biden but then complains because a statist posts here. lol

Bob C

I encourage you to consider becoming more of a Panarchist and open to peaceful parallel societies. That way, those who support your ideas can be subject to them and those who PEACEFULLY reject them but are willing to leave others alone, are left alone. You’re a well meaning and good guy, let’s not turn your preferences and ideas into instruments of involuntary tyranny for those who prefer something else, but who remain peaceful. Voluntaryism does not prevent your goals, it just rejects imposing them on people willing to leave you alone.   The means we use should not be ignored… Read more »

THE ANTIFA GHOST

You know what Bob, if you want to stop using every service the U.S. government provides and get off U.S. land, by all means, I think you should be left alone. Until then, you use U.S. property or services, you pay. You own property here? Guess what, those property deeds were first issued by the State of New Hampshire, and they never gave up allodial rights as part of the sale. Therefore, you need to honor the contractual conditions of that fee simple title, which subjects you to property taxation and potentially even eminent domain. This situation, where one entity… Read more »

clymer

I believe that was karl and not Bob. If I understand Bob Call’s position on government (and I am still learning), ANY political structure (including traditional democratic processes) invariably strengthen the legitimacy of coercive governments, so withdrawal of the cooperation and tacit consent on which state power ultimately depends is the best way to create a society that is not controlled by government, which is prone to corruption. So an ideal system would have no constraints on individual liberty, other than preventing crime, aggression, etc.

clymer

edit: sorry, i thought you wrote “thanks Bob, i agree..” Just read it again, my bad

Bob C

Services eh? Hmmm…

Not being able to untangle goods and services people actually want from bads and disservices they don’t want is quite the “you will eat everything we serve you or else” buffet of asininity and an Overlordian mind trick.

Don’t fall for it.

THE ANTIFA GHOST

Why do you think you’re owed services a la carte, or that this would happen without government?

Bob C

The only thing I’m owed is the same thing you are owed. If you are peaceful and not “trespassing” against others, there should be reciprocity of choice. If there isn’t reciprocity, to style what we then have as “freedom” is absurd and a lie. Would you frequent a Restaurant that told you, you HAD to pay for a large nacho plate (with jalapenos!!!) and 37 beers you never ordered? Or being told, “see that guy waaay over there in California, he drank those beers and said put it on Antifa Ghost’s tab? You gonna pay up or do we have… Read more »

clymer

Yeah, I am more on the side of the libertarians with this one. Just purely looking at the state of America in 2024 you would have to have ideological blinders on to not see the true nature of this out of control government, both in terms of spending and power grabbing. My sense is that the left sees government as a necessary means to ensure that balance is maintained in society, keeping it moving forward and developing human beings to live together, advancing only mutually beneficial interests and preventing the most powerful from exploiting the most vulnerable. This may be… Read more »

THE ANTIFA GHOST

“As an observable fact, we can verify that wealth and power has concentrated in fewer hands as western governments have become larger. The super class demonstrate a tendency to reinvest wealth and power in order to control government, which allows them to continue to slant the playing field more toward their advantage. Ultimately, this disparity becomes so extreme that the design of the super class becomes unfathomable. The national security apparatus has become their policing arm, regulatory agencies have become revolving doors for the industries they control, the governing class all appear to be on their payroll, only advancing rules… Read more »

THE ANTIFA GHOST

(Maybe instead we can look at changing the economic system by which wealth and power funnels up into the hands of the few. Just some food for thought!)

clymer

Yes, exactly. That’s why I spend so much time talking about the economy and sound money. Fiat currency is the biggest problem because it fuels both predatory practices by the super class, and profligate spending by the political class. The only answer I can think of is the same answer that has worked before; limited government and an informed citizenry that diligently enforces law and jealously protects their natural rights. I am in the same camp as Brad on this one. example: Federal programs to control public education appear to be more of a means to prevent public education, more… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by clymer
Starchild

Eliminating coercive taxation would be the obvious way to make that happen.

David

Ok maybe it was on my end that I thought I was blocked from posting..
So it could, probably was, my bad

clymer

Government of, for and by the people should have dominion over corporations insofar as to restrict monopoly power and protect the common good (i.e. environmental pollution). Government should be limited in scope so that it remains transparent and controllable. The marketplace of ideas, when left free of corporate influence over corrupt government can do a lot to advance society in terms of freedom and possibility. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate, which is… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by clymer
Starchild

“How does removing the government fix this control by the wealthy?”

Because just being wealthy does not give you the perceived legitimacy of being a State, and the coercive power that comes with that. Without government, the chief mechanism for wealthy people to exert control over others is gone. One guy trying to run a private army isn’t going to be very effective. To control large numbers of people, and get them to cooperate and buy into your system, you need not just money and weapons, but an institution that has wormed its way into people’s lives over time.

THE ANTIFA GHOST

“Would you frequent a Restaurant that told you, you HAD to pay for a large nacho plate (with jalapenos!!!) and 37 beers you never ordered? Or being told, “see that guy waaay over there in California, he drank those beers and said put it on Antifa Ghost’s tab?” No, I would not. What is your point? “To answer your question – The reason I think this would happen “without government” is EVEN in the pseudo free market we have today, you aren’t (yet) made to pay for the California guys appetite. That’s HIS tab and his choice.” Why do you… Read more »

clymer

..so he’s been trolling this entire time! that wisenheimer!

David

So…..
The Republicans are doing Russia’s work.
With this Smirnoff guy.

Jesus.

Your *peeps are Traitors.
And *you are Traitors.

Hopefully people like Comer are prosecuted, as any American would want.

Which leaves out REPUBLICANS.

Fucking Traitors.

THAT’S YOU THREE

Last edited 1 year ago by David
clymer

:q

clymer

folks, if I can just suggest – if you’re planning on replying to this bizarre and unhinged rant, to not use the word “racist”. Please. He’s liable to hurt himself

AD Director Marx

It used to be fun messing with Dave, but now I feel too bad about it. His brain is even more broken than usual. I’m not even sure he’s capable of coherent thoughts anymore. In some respects, he’s posting like wazoo.

clymer

Yeah, something going on up there.. he’s out of his tits. Needs to use absolute “I am your enemy” terms (“traitor”). Honestly, it’s sad and scary. Grouping you, I and Brad together as republican, statist traitors.. I got nothing

Silvia DeSitter

Oh I’m sure everything’ll be just hunky-dory again once Dave’s totally slept off that 30-pack of Schlitz and stuff Clymer. Well, at least till Saturday night when he totally ties one on again and stuff. You know how he is. 😉

clymer

lol is schlitz still a thing? Nostalgically reminds me of my early teens when me and my buddies used to pool change together, emptying pockets and have the neighborhood homeless dude that lived in the woods go the the package store to buy us carlins black label

Bob C

This sounds vaguely familiar. Lol.

Often Karl sees the opposite.

What? What’re ya talking about, Karl? Messing with Dave is like a Free Keene dot com staple and stuff. 😉

Ya know, I think your problem is you’re just not doing it right and stuff. Don’t ask me for advice, though, cuz I like totally think you like totally suck and stuff. 😉

Intrigare

Idk I think Dave may be on to something about Republicans. He just left out Democrats so I think that’s where he could use some work 😛

Silvia DeSitter

Ya know Intrigare, I’ve always liked the term “uniparty” myself.

I think it was Steve Bannon who coined that term and stuff. Which like totally ensures that Dave’ll never add it to his personal lexicon and stuff, am I right? 😉

Anyway, looks like Nikki Haley’s gotten her ass handed to her again. And in her home state and stuff no less. Jeepers. I can’t wait to see how Dave’s gonna handle that. 😉

David

So Republicans back a man who still lies about the election after sending a mob to stop the count at the Capitol. And they go to a Russian spy and call him “extremely credible” for information of how to impeach Biden. Shocker the Russian spy was a liar. So Republicans go to an “extremely credible” Russian spy to overturn our government, so that a convicted rapist can be installed into office! And now when they are blatantly in bold-faced exposed for it they don’t even own it! What more evidence do you need that Republicans are Traitors? So that means… Read more »

clymer

i’m thinking this post could have been broken up into 5 separate posts

David

To the stupid cunt.
Your boy Comer sold the USA to Russia.
You getting a clue yet?

Dave guesses statists have taken over since.

I know, right? I mean God, what a tool and stuff, huh Dave? That Comer guy I mean. 😉 Anyway, I just love going down memory lane and stuff. How about you, Dave? Hey, remember that one time when Karl was like trying to like totally scare us like totally shitless and stuff about global warming and stuff and he like totally like told us that it was gonna like totally like suffocate us and stuff even though global warming is like totally about globally warming things and stuff and not about globally suffocating things and stuff? God. Karl’s just… Read more »

clymer

If that is taking the high road, i am guessing that the low road includes more insults

David

Trump’s campaign PAC “save America” might be facing felony charges
(America should be saved from HIM, and his traitorous dupes and minions, including the ones in here)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2024/02/23/trumps-leadership-pac-likely-committed-felony-bipartisan-ethics-group-says/amp/

Last edited 1 year ago by David
Intrigare

Oh no! 😛

clymer

LOL (this blog is like a handful of adults having a conversation and the petulant child periodically runs in the middle of the room to make obnoxious noise for no other reason than to make himself seen and acknowledged)

clymer

The origin of the American republic is distinguished by peculiar circumstances. Other nations had been driven together by fear and necessity. In the formation of our constitution, the wisdom of all ages is collected, the legislators of antiquity are consulted, it is an empire of reason. In the formation of such a government, it is not only the right, but the duty of every citizen to examine the principles of it, with a constant eye to our circumstances and endeavor to foresee the future operations of our system and its effects upon human happiness.

https://archive.org/details/cu31924020874099/page/n44/mode/1up

David

Nikki Haley got 4 delegates in Mi. Primary.. GOOD FOR HER!

David

So… It’s all because of me that there is so many comments in threads.

Let that sink in.

I’m glad that the moderator isn’t the statist that I had thought.

As you were

clymer

yeah, Brad, I happened upon this blog as a means to network with folks that are both local and like-minded. It turns out that you are probably the closest match that I personally have in this regard, probably because we have both worked in or with government and understand the requirement for foundational structure necessary to effect safety and happiness for the people. Although folks like karl and I have very little in common, in terms of sharing a worldview, there is no denying the fact that he is a generally intelligent person and so I am glad to exchange… Read more »

Starchild

“I think more anarchists should spend time on ride-alongs with the police on Saturday nights…” As an anarchist, I completely agree. Not necessarily for the reasons you think this would be a good idea, but for purposes of accountability and transparency, as well as penetrating the “bubble” of these workplaces and exposing those who work in them to the perspectives of how ordinary people view the sausage-making. Ordinary members of the public should be empowered to go on police ride-alongs, sit in on classrooms in government schools, and walk into prisons or government agency offices to observe the goings-on, on… Read more »

David

So you don’t block comments(?) ?

David

Ian wouldn’t.
And it’s his site, or*was his

170
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x