David Ridley Reports That Judge Burke is Now Receiving Enhanced Security
Here.
The only thing Judge Burke needs to be worried about is all the New Hampshire State Representatives I’ve already spoken to about this.
Here.
The only thing Judge Burke needs to be worried about is all the New Hampshire State Representatives I’ve already spoken to about this.
This blog is made pursuant to NH Rules of Professional Conduct 3.6 (c) (2) as the documents below are public records with the Cheshire County Superior Court.
– Court order regarding defendant’s “Motion To Extend Filing Deadline” .PDF
(Motion Granted)
– Court order regarding defendant’s “Motion To Refrain From Authorizing Physical Force To Demand Respect” .PDF
(Motion DENIED)
– Court order regarding defendant’s “Motion To Dismiss” .PDF
(Motion Denied)
This blog is made pursuant to NH Rules of Professional Conduct 3.6 (c) (2) and (c) (6) as the testimony I am referring to below was given at a public hearing at the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and thus, it is part of a public record. Additionally, the people of New Hampshire should be aware of the danger to the public interest.
As the time approaches where the string of events leading up to State v. Jason Talley becomes more and more public, I would like to remind the New Hampshire Supreme Court (and the news media) that at the “Rule 78” hearing on 12/16/11, (the rule about restrictions of New Hampshire’s Constitution Part I, Article 22 in the court system) that I attended, I stood right in front of you, on camera, and told you exactly how the courts were “inviolably” preserving the right to the freedom of the press in Cheshire County: a crime was committed by a sitting judge and high ranking judicial officials stripped rights away in an attempt to try and change the story.
I was even happy to see the former judge that I used to testify to as a police officer present on the panel. I figured it was beneficial to have someone on the panel who knows I am not a liar.
I spoke the truth, on camera, about the judicial cover-up occurring after Adam Mueller’s illegal arrest and how it ensnared Jason Talley. I was apparently ignored.
As Part II, Article 73-a makes you, the Supreme Court, the boss of all the lower courts in New Hampshire, I hope you are preparing to explain to the public how you were told specifically how a crime was being covered up in Cheshire County by judicial officers you supervise, but apparently did nothing about it.
^— This man spent two days incarcerated for a crime he never committed. He spent two days incarcerated for constitutionally protected activity.
Hold Judge Burke and the other judges who are involved accountable because it is the ethical thing to do… not because politics forces you to do so later.
You’re not above the law… you’re entrusted with it.
This blog is made pursuant to NH Rules of Professional Conduct 3.6 (c) (2) and (c) (6) as the below have been filed with the Cheshire County Superior Court and the people of New Hampshire should be aware of the danger to the public interest.
The New Hampshire Judicial Branch belongs to the people of this state, not the people who hold (and have abused) positions of power within it.
– Motion To Authorize Criminal Depositions of Four Judges .PDF
– Motion To Change Venue .PDF
In the words of a frequent FreeKeene.com commenter and critic on our Motion To Dismiss charges against Jason, “enslave keene” stated:
For all that know me and probably wish I would just go away, let me call a spade a spade here and say Judge Burke messed up big here. The fact he did this to a person or persons I personally find to be of low integrity does not negate the fact that a standing judge did abuse very special powers granted him under the assumption of honest execution of those powers.
Judge Burke, you messed up. You let “them” get under your skin, I get it but sorry you have got to stand accountable for this one.
… as do the New Hampshire Judicial Branch officials who enacted rules restricting constitutional rights as a result of his criminal conduct.
This blog is made pursuant to NH Rules of Professional Conduct 3.6 (c) (2) as the below has been filed with the 9th Circuit – Merrimack District Division Court.