WMUR’s First Report from Ademo’s Trial Features Standing Ovation!
Thanks to WMUR’s Amy Coveno for this initial report from Ademo’s “wiretapping” trial from Manchester’s “superior” court:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5xJIxuDRng
Thanks to WMUR’s Amy Coveno for this initial report from Ademo’s “wiretapping” trial from Manchester’s “superior” court:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5xJIxuDRng
Upset about the Ademo decision?
Don’t just cuss and moan, DO something.
Next step, The House Criminal Justice committee is taking is THIS WEDNESDAY.
An Interim Study subcommittee on HB 553 has been scheduled for Wednesday August 15 at 10am in LOB 208 (facebook event)
The subcommittee’s task is to study the bill and recommend to the full committee that it is either Recommended for Future Legislation or Not Recommended for Future Legislation. As the bill makes numerous changes to the wiretapping statute, it may be helpful to consult RSA 570-A for comparison.
Rep. Mark Warden, who attended Ademo’s trial, is the chairman of this subcommittee. He says: “If you come, we’ll hear your testimony. There is some desire within the legislature to clear up this horrible statute, but nobody has found a solid solution in the language. Additionally, many legislators love Big Brother, er, I mean big government, and kowtow to what the Attorney General’s office and other law enforcement types say. And, of course, _they_ want everything to be illegal — it means job security for them.”
This is just another step in the process, but today’s verdict shows reform is needed, not merely theory…
Can’t make it to Concord on Wednesday?,
Send an email (if you LIVE in NH) to:
HouseCriminalJusticeandPub
cc your own Reps, (also candidates for those seats in the upcoming election)
CC: your Senator (and the candidates for next session) too
See http://
And don’t forget to Cc the House Leadership
Speaker: william.obrien@leg.state.n
Majority Leader: PSilva372@aol.com
Minority Leader: terie.norelli@leg.state.nh
BE POLITE.
BE CLEAR YOU ARE UPSET THAT THE CURRENT LAW IS SO POORLY WORDED.
DO NOT RANT, BE FACTUAL AND CONCISE.
DID I MENTION BE POLITE?
[And if you don’t yet live in NH, why the heck not? Move. (Oh, wait, that was Ademo being told he should move away… ironic, huh?)
Try this Move. Ah, much better.]
MikeforLiberty gives a peek into the help available for those who are moving to the Shire as part of the Free State Project (or in this case, moving within the Shire). When you know you’re going to arrive, let people know via the FSP forum and Shire forum, offer some beers and pizza, and you’ll likely have a whole moving crew show up to help you! It’s also a great chance to meet your new activist neighbors!
New Hampshire is one of those states where sobriety checkpoints are legal. All the police have to do is get the approve from a judge and then tell the media in a town that a checkpoint will happen in that town. The media then reports when the checkpoint will happen. On July 27th, the Concord Monitor reported that a sobriety checkpoint would happen in Concord, NH during the 1st week of August. NH drivers are allowed to turn around before a checkpoint (more…)
Ademo today was visited by Michael Valentine, the individual who, on Monday at Hillsborough County Superior Court will argue that he should spend 21-years caged because he pointed-out the assault of 17-yr-old Frank Harrington by Manchester PD employee Darren Murphy.
Background: CopBlock.org/FreeAdemo
A few things Ademo noted:
Valentine plans to submit into evidence Admeo’s radio interview with Girard at Large captured in-studio on December 6th of last year due to this statement from Ademo:
Though I didn’t state to the individuals I was audio and video recording them I did state to them that my name is Ademo Freeman from CopBlock.org and I’m seeking comment off of Officer Murphy’s actions in the cafeteria.”
Published today at CopBlock.org is an article by William N. Grigg on the Orwellian irony in the slogan of police in the United States, “To protect and serve”. He overviews lawsuits in New Hampshire and other states which suggest that some police believe civilians to have an active duty to protect and to serve them.
Since the news broke earlier this week that Beverly Mutrie was being sued by officers wounded in the raid on Cullen Mutrie’s residence in Greenland, I have wondered what made the plaintiffs believe that this lawsuit could be considered legitimate. Commentary in the Union Leader acknowledged that Beverly Mutrie is not currently facing any criminal charges connected to her son’s alleged oxycodone distribution. Unless police care to provide evidence that she had direct knowledge of ongoing criminal activity, this case seems like quite a reach. Cullen Mutrie and Brittany Tibbetts were accused of selling opiate pharmaceuticals out of their house, which was owned by Ms. Mutrie. Does evidence exist that Ms. Mutrie had knowledge of a drug ring, or is the emotional weight of a murdered police officer and wounded SWAT units being used to extort a mother grieving the loss of her child? It is an awful shame that anyone had to experience violence on the April evening of the botched raid. It is unfortunate that so many, especially in law enforcement, fail to recognize how the system manufactures opportunities for crime profiteering, which the state then powers a war to desist.
Your “Duty” To Protect and Serve the Police
by William N. GriggPolice have no enforceable duty to protect an individual threatened by criminal violence. A lawsuit recently filed in New Hampshire demonstrates that police (more…)