Overloaded Courts Ordered to Shutdown!

January 29, 2010 by
Filed under: Issues, Personal Freedom 

BurkeEver sat in an arraignment on a Monday or Tuesday morning in Keene District Court? The room is usually packed full of people, the supermajority of which have never harmed another person. They are there for harmless traffic tickets, drug possession, open container, or some other nonsense “crime against the state”, where there is no true victim. Well, correction, the people who are in court for these “crimes” are actually the victims of aggression by the people calling themselves the state or city. They shuffle in and line up to cut a “deal” with the prosecutor and pay in many cases hundreds of dollars just to make the awful experience go away.

You can almost hear the cash register ring to the tune of thousands of dollars each day. Most of the people who are being caught for these things certainly cannot afford to pay these fines whether or not the economy is doing well. Many of them have to go on payment plans, because they certainly don’t want to go to jail, which is what is done if they don’t pay up. You’d think that with all that cash rolling in from these victimless “criminals” that the system would be in the black. You would be wrong. This is bureaucracy we’re talking about, and they don’t have the ability to run efficiently, period.

The Keene Sentinel’s Phil Bantz reports that the courts are in such dire financial shape, they have to shut down – not completely, but enough to make scheduling and “speedy trials” even more difficult. Many trials of local liberty activists are already set into late spring, and may be delayed even longer with the pending shutdown.

Perhaps if the police would stop aggressing against peaceful people then the caseload would be manageable and they wouldn’t have to be going through this.

Can you imagine what would happen if 5-10% of the victims of state aggression stopped plea bargaining and took their cases to trial? The entire system would crash and burn. Their power rests on your obedience, so set the example and refuse to take a plea. Make them pay to schedule a trial and if you can afford to, take the jail time rather than pay them fines so it costs them even more.

Perhaps they’ll eventually do the right thing and leave peaceful people alone and only go after real criminals who harm others. Here’s the Sentinel story:

Already understaffed and overloaded with cases, Keene District Court and Cheshire County Superior Court, in the heart of the city’s downtown, are bracing for monthly closures and temporary layoffs.

Saying it was the saddest moment of his 37 years in the state’s judicial system, Chief Justice John T. Broderick Jr. met with judges and marital masters last Friday and asked them to take furloughs, an unprecedented request.

Unprecedented, but necessary, Broderick says, to accomplish the $3.1 million cut in court spending Gov. John H. Lynch has ordered as part of a plan to slash $25 million from statewide personnel costs.

The furloughs are mandatory for the 230 non-union employees and 147 court security officers. And an “overwhelming majority” of the state’s 101 judges and marital masters, who must volunteer for the furloughs, have already agreed to take the same amount of unpaid time off as other staffers, Broderick said.

“They (judges and masters) represent about $900,000 of the $3.1 million in cuts,” he said. “If they didn’t participate, it would be hard to describe what would happen.”

The remaining 346 employees who belong to the State Employees’ Association or collective bargaining units have yet to decide on the furloughs. Negotiations are ongoing.

If the bargaining units refuse to take furloughs, members will be laid off, Broderick said.

“The last thing we want is layoffs,” he said. “On the other hand, the economy is terrible. There are no bad guys. We’re just trying to do what we can.”

The furloughs and monthly court closures are expected to begin in late March or early April and continue through June 2011, at least. Closing the state’s 42 courts for an estimated 17 days over the next two fiscal years is expected to cause significant delays in every type of case, from criminal trials to divorce and child custody hearings.

“I expect a lot of complaints from frustrated people,” said Cheshire County Superior Court Clerk Barbara A. Hogan. “We’re very concerned about what this means for our people who have cases pending. We already have complaints every day, but now it’s going to get louder and more frequent.”

Cheshire County Attorney Peter W. Heed said the county’s criminal justice system will suffer as a result of the furlough-related court closures.

“The people in this county are stretched as thin as they can possibly be, and everybody in the criminal justice system continues to do more with less,” he said. “Anything that closes the court has an impact on the criminal justice system and the citizens in general. It’s a sad day when something like this happens.”

Superior Court handled about 800 cases in 2008, and Keene District Court handled more than 6,000 cases that year. Hearings at both courts are sometimes scheduled six to nine months in advance, and the hearings slated for days when the courts will be closed for furloughs will have to be rescheduled. That’s no easy task when the docket’s already full.

“Somebody is expecting a day in court and that somebody has probably been waiting a very long time for it,” Hogan said. “I would like to know, as soon as possible, what days the court will be closed.”

A closure schedule will be released by April at the latest, Broderick said.

“We’re trying to schedule the furlough days during long weekends,” he said. “We’re trying to lessen the impact, but, obviously, you can’t do that totally.”

Unlike the state’s superior courts, district courts handle arraignments that often occur on short notice. State law says anyone who is arrested has a right to stand before a judge and address the charges he or she faces within 24 hours of being taken into custody, except on weekends or holidays.

“If someone is arrested the day before the court closes, what happens the next morning?” asked Keene District Court Clerk Larry Kane. “Someone needs to explain to us how that will happen. … I’m sure these things are being talked about.”

Though no real plan exists, Broderick said judges and other essential staff, such as security officers and clerks, might be placed on call to handle arraignments and other emergencies when the courts are closed.

“Once we know the outcome of the union negotiations and the parameters of the furlough program, hopefully that will be Friday, we’ll begin internal planning to address these types of issues,” he said. “The people in this system are pretty extraordinary folks in their ability to adapt.”

Hogan, an example of this adaptive ability, began serving as the the clerk for Sullivan County Superior Court when its clerk retired Dec. 1. She is the only dual-court clerk in the state.

“Day by day, I have to change my schedule as things arise,” said Hogan, a Keene resident. “I feel like I’m juggling because both courts are busy and have all sorts of important things going on. It’s a real challenge, but we’re used to being flexible. We’re accustomed to that.”

Aside from creating constitutional issues for defendants and scheduling conflicts, closing the courts may also exacerbate the ongoing problem of backlogged cases.

“We’re very short-staffed as it is right now,” Kane said. “We’ve got five people doing the job of eight. If we’re told to stay home for a day, the work is going to build up. It’s not going away.”

Broderick knows. So does Chief Justice Robert J. Lynn, who oversees the state’s superior courts.

“I think that nobody in state government is happy this has to happen,” Lynn said. “But we all have to do our part.”

Broderick said, “The piles of paperwork get higher. The delays get longer. I apologize to the people of New Hampshire who have to deal with that. But I don’t know any other way to deal with it other than to say, ‘I’m sorry and we’re trying to help.’ ”

Phillip Bantz can be reached at 352-1234, extension 1409, or pbantz@keenesentinel.com

  • AnarchoJesse

    Why don't they just call the whole thing off and take an extended unpaid vacation?

  • Chaz Munro

    The state is dying and they don't even get that they're "sick". I feel that they are particularly vulnerable at this time to outright attacks against their ill-presumed "legitimacy".

    This will be their big chance to go get real jobs in the community and stop being such welfare queens.

  • http://www.soundclick.com/thinkliberty thinkliberty

    You have the right to a speedy trial, unless they decide to close the court that day.

    The people of New Hampshire who have to deal with that have no other option, because they have a violent monopoly and you don't.

  • http://newhampshirefreepress.com Kat Kanning

    Maybe sticking all those Keeniacs in jail tipped this from "Barely making it" to "Shutdown" :)

  • http://www.jraxis.com/ J’raxis 270145

    This is, of course, only an emergency response. The question is, what are they going to do to try and make sure they don’t need to do something like this again once the courts re-open.

    In Massachusetts, people have to pay a fee to enter a not guilty plea and have a trial.

    In Rhode Island, if one is found guilty, one pays hundreds of dollars in court costs.

    Both of these states have specialized “traffic courts” where the rules of evidence, due process, and other Constitutional rights are ignored even moreso than they are in District Courts. Other states have created “drug courts” with similar “streamlined” process for drug cases.

    And many states have started outright denying trials to violation-level offenses altogether (ticketable offenses, less serious than misdemeanors and felonies), instead handling them “administratively”; for example, for a traffic ticket, the Department of Motor Vehicles would hold a hearing in front of their bureaucrats, where not even the scant due process rights of any judicial courts apply.

    So once they regroup, one has to wonder what kind of tricks they’re going to try to pull here in order to make their extortion racket run more profitably.

  • Thomas

    To put another monkey wrench into the machine of the courts, demand (not ask) for a jury (it's our right), and use jury nullification!

  • holla_@_ya_boy

    Does anyone know how "speedy trial" works? How long do they have to try a case before it has to be dismissed? Are they in danger of defaulting on cases because of their revenue problems?

  • CJS

    ( QUOTE)If the bargaining units refuse to take furloughs, members will be laid off, Broderick said.

    “The last thing we want is layoffs,” he said. “On the other hand, the economy is terrible. There are no bad guys. We’re just trying to do what we can.”(/QUOTE)

    God forbid the public sector do what the rest of the world is doing and lay people off during the depression we are in . Why is it civil servants have almost guaranteed employment ?

    How come statements like this from bureaucrats do not make the general public scream and protest en mass in the streets ? What the hell is it going to take to wake people up ?

    Also I just LOVE the way the article starts .. "already understaffed" … maybe they have more than enough staff and to many bullshit cases to prosecute .

  • http://freetalklive.com/ Ian

    What will it take? Hundreds of people coming here to make change happen!

  • Dan

    It is common knowledge among judges and prosecutors that if even a small fraction more people chose to take their cases to trial then the whole system would come crashing down. They depend on people being afraid and pleaing to self-preserve. Free staters should be proud as having contributed to this – bad for individualized justice, but definitely the right direction in exposing the criminal justice system for what it is – a horribly run and unethical extortion racket.

  • http://nhunderground.com Russell Kanning

    goodie

    government running out of money and judges having to take pay cuts
    :)

    keep up the pressure

  • Evan

    Here here! Now if only this obvious market demand for a just court system could be relieved by some sort of competitive, polycentric legal structure. The challenge, I suspect, will be convincing the aggressors, (agents of the state,) to submit to third-party arbitration.

  • theKINGofKEENE

    Well, this should settle the issue. All you *BONE-HEADS* out there who keep insisting that the Court system actually *MAKES MONEY*(profit…) from court actions have now been proven wrong. OH???…So now you're saying that this Court shutdown is just a *RUSE* to make the public think that the Courts really don't have as much money as they say they do???…Stupid idiots…I've been saying all along that the Courts operate at a net loss. *THAT* loss is one reason that the current shutdown is happening. And if it wasn't for years of neglect by incompetent & petty local & County/State officials, Kangaroo/keene district court would not be labeled *DEFICIENT* by the State! Several years ago now, I pointed out to the State, at a public hearing on the status of the States' courts, (I'll help you find my comments online, if you want…), that simply by the Administrative Office of the Courts to have an "automatic dismissal" policy, for example, would easily save enough $$$ to have avoided this whole shutdown. Do the math on simple marijauna possession cases…The "state" continues to bleed $$$ subsidizing the PERSECUTION of otherwise peaceful potheads. To hell with taxing weed, just stop wasting TAX$$$ persecuting adults who choose to smoke/use weed…///…As for the "speedy trial issue", that's another fucking joke. Back before William J. Albrecht iv, the disgraced former County PERSECUTOR, literally FLED the AREA(!)…I had an appeal from Kangaroo Court on a couple of bogus misdemeanor convictions pending in Cheshire County Circus Superior Court…Judge "John-Boy" Arnold (…after "judge" P. Mangones' game-playing recusal for trumped-up reasons…), let the cases drag out for well over 1 1/2 *YEARS*! Never did get my day in Court on that one…Court rules still apply: For *ANY* appeal pending w/out final decision for 6 or months, "a hearing *SHALL BE* held to determine whether or not the defendant's right to a speedy trial has been violated"…(near, but not exact quote…). So when the Court *BLATANTLY VIOLATES* *THEIR OWN RULES*, who arrests the judge? HAH! ///…PEOPLE! This is not the time to slack off! The Court system is collapsing. THE BEST thing we can do is to hit the court, and hit it *HARD*. We just might kill it. Um, metaphorically speaking, of course…///ME?…I want NOTHING to do with the courts…I'll be filing my paperwork soon…&no, Lance, you *NEVER WERE* my "friend"…asshole…How would I know that that day I say you in the Court lobby was the day ELI RIVERA attacked Kurt???…I *KNOW* what RIVERA did to me. *THAT'S* why I believe that Rivera also attacked Kurt…///…so it goes…

Want to discuss rather than just commenting here? Visit the Shire Society Forum.


Send your news tips to: News at FreeKeene.com