Nick Ryder has published the latest video to show the arrests of 5 people in downtown Keene that took place on Sunday. It all began after one woman was arrested for drinking a beer on a City bench.
As of Monday Morning, all arrested activists except for Rich Paul and Ian are out of custody with pending charges. It is unclear why either is still in, or what they are charged with, but the most updated information will be found on our forum thread about this subject at http://forum.freekeene.com/index.php?topic=3564
good job in getting the registration charge dropped
when burke said"it borders on contempt" (about the Shire)
i wanted Ian to say "i do have contempt for this court!"
but of coarse you can't say that unless you want jail time or fines
Oh yes, if you question the legitimacy of your masters' behavior, or fail to show them the respect they want, they'll lock you away.
Gangsters and tyrants tend to act violently in response to perceived "disrespect".
Jailtime or fine? In this company both means Jailtime, although the latter is more indirect and obscured jailtime.
youse are going to hate me:i think judge Burke did pretty good…………..One thing bothered me…………I thought every case was suppose to be sentenced ON ITS OWN MERITS…meaning hes not suppose to consider other previous stuff/ dealing/offenses :i'm talking about when he did that to assess the 'sentences"
No too bad Ian.. the half hour trial cost more than $186 and even though your private plates aren't yet recognized by the UN, your point was made. It seems somewhat prejudicial that the cop is allowed to wear his uniform while testifying. Maybe next time the defense could make a motion to have him cover the uniform, by offering the court a one-size fits all polyester 1970s leisure suit, conveniently folded on the defense table among the papers. For security, a motion should be made that a bailiff escort the officer to the restroom for changing. At some point,… Read more »
Good work, lots of courage as usual. Very proud of you guys!
You should have objected to him saying the "ways of the state of new hampshire" The STATE does not own the road it as an easement . The right to use it is vested in the unorganized public not the body politic aka organized public.
lookup highways corpus juris
Here's a link screenshot to the section https://docs.google.com/View?id=dcm8m458_466hkfzm…
link is a screenshot of Corpus Juis Highways Right and Modes of Use https://docs.google.com/File?id=dcm8m458_528cztxc…
It's rather ironic that while denying the existence of the State of New Hampshire, you submit to its system of "justice" in order to fight its "existence." I'm not being flippant here. I think the position that "the state does not exist" is irrational. The position that "the state SHOULD not exist" is rational and should be the position that people take. Appearing delusional is no way to gain support. It's rather a Catch-22 that in order to fight the existance of state power you have to submit to it and argue within its domain to vainly attempt to weaken… Read more »
Good Job Ian et. al. It takes a lot of nerve to appear in court in self-defense. The cards are stacked against you and the judge can just refuse to recognize your arguments. It is rather frivolous to make up your own state of being a free man, or is it? Kind of like arguing with a shark in the ocean. Without the right tool, you have no chance of winning.
One question the state should have asked if it was truly trying to be thorough…
Has Ian ever registered a vehicle in the state of NH before?
If that has ever happened then Ian would be shown to have knowledge of the registration laws.
So, has he?
"Dale Everett and Ian Freeman have pending appeals to the State Supreme Court before they will be forced to serve time or pay the fine related to that charge."
Sounds like a defeatist attitude. Perhaps they know they have no case, they are just trying to make a point. And waste more tax dollars at the same time.
I believe a "appeal" to the supreme court costs some money and i don't believe you get it back. I was thinking of Edward and Elaine Brown; they didn't pay thier taxes and i believe they got like 30 years (which seems outrageous to me) but my point is : the only way to really be "free" or whatever is to be a outlaw like bonnie and clyde" and break the laws and not pay taxes and just be on the run from the law and perhaps just not engage at all and be a hiding outlaw. I'm saying this… Read more »
I need a shire plate! I shall make one for my vehicle, but I shall call it a Ian Freeman Plate!
I don't appreciate the judge threatening violence in the middle of testimony by claiming borderline contempt.
In relation to the Shire, im wondering how various other cultural entities have worked in "recognizable legitimacy" in the courts to which they have negated certain laws.
Keep asking the tough questions.
I'm sure they'd be quite happy to be left alone, and not waste any tax dollars at all. It's the state agents who chose to agress, and you're blaming the victim.
I'm only a quarter of the way through the video so I don't know if it wasn't mentioned but one interesting tactic that came to mind was questioning Frank's ability to be heard and understood (which Lauren certainly had issues with) particularly with such a massive crowd outside all scattered around. Questions that brings up: 1. Earlier you testified that you said "You people gotta go, you can't be here if yer protestin', the cops are comin'"? Is this correct? How did you say it? Did you say it as loud as you have here today? Louder, quieter? Could you… Read more »
Sweet! Ian actually did use that whole "Did you personally communicate the order to me." thing. Awesome.
EDIT: And Dale nailed it afterward pointing out the same thing and his location relative to Frank AND getting Frank to read the statute. Excellent work.
Another bit of non-lawyerly advice: 1. They don't care what you're disposition was. Ever. Menacing, acting like a freak, smiling, throwing money to the homeless, none of it is relevant to the judge. His goal is this: A) Are you charged with something? (you're there so the answer is yes) B) Is there evidence or testimony you did whatever it is they claim (this is per witness) C) Do you have evidence to the contrary or an argument that nullifies the other testimony? 2. When you cross examine witnesses, everything you ask them is to establish the facts in the… Read more »
wow zeus is good at writing alot.
brb while i read it……….(i have decided reading his stuff isnt a waste of time even if it is alot) thats a complement btw
Ian,
I applaud your tenacity at standing up to the court system. There is a course you may be interested in call Jurisdictionary to assist with proceedure. The court system is all about proceedure, collecting judgements, and not justice.
If you want to go the freeman route, Winston Shrout has a great course. Ben Lowrey also has a lot of info on his adventures in liberty on his website.
Wish I had the guts to stand up like you and so many others. My time will come.
the state of new hampshire only exists in the minds of the ignorant to see it's just land.
JUST land. Mountains, streams, farms, etc. Nothing more than land that some people have chosen to take some control over, change the name of the land to New Hampshire, and then choose to put people in cages over the rules they come up with for it.
all based on imagination and force.
"…all based on imagination and force."""…. <—-No, butthead, *SOME* of it is based on arbitrary interpretations of words on paper…just sayin'…….