Please share this version with your charitable friends.
Recent Forum Posts
- Robert L. Lamontagne vs. The State of New Hampshire: An E-mail to an Assistant County Prosecutor May 22, 2025 system
- Free stater Alec found not guilty in trial over possession of weed in town of Jaffrey: Cop can’t distinguish between legal CBD flower and cannabis May 14, 2025 penguin
- Robert L. Lamontagne vs. The State of New Hampshire: Defense Filed Documents May 4, 2025 system
- Martial law in NH? April 29, 2025 Leif_Alexander
- Colorado Dems attempting to force Uber out of state? April 27, 2025 RidleyReport2
Other Cool Sites
[…] By Shire Dude […]
[…] a comedy night at Murphy’s Taproom, throwing a party at the largest arcade in the world and donating parking fines to the charity. If you can think of a new, creative way to gather donations, let me know in a comment […]
Now this is amusing. Why didn’t you just park like you are supposed to so not to get parking tickets and then you can send money to anyone you want. I seriously doubt you would have donated any money to anyone if you weren’t convicted. By the way, it’s not tax deductible.
Jumping Jacks Points are for moving violations only and a parking violation is not a moving violation, esquire.
InternetJeb Jumping Jacks No, if a person becomes a habitual offender with the parking tickets, you can lose points off your drivers license. With some jobs, even parking violations are a negative mark against your work record.
Jumping Jacks InternetJeb So parking tickets allow people to lose (sic) points from their driver’s licenses now? To use your new pet word, Jacks, that’s “interesting”. All jests aside, Jacks, your recurrent grammar mistakes aren’t nearly as appalling as the factual errors you tend to make because of your refusal to perform rudimentary research. There are no state DMV’s in this country (or DMV’s in any other country for that matter) that assess driver’s license points to habitual parking ticket offenders. Why do you insist upon including such absurd arguments in the many criticisms you’ve posted here, Jacks? Do you think your readers won’t investigate your idiotic statements on their own time in order to corroborate… Read more »
Drac Vermell Jumping Jacks InternetJeb You know, you are just too stupid and immature to have a conversation with.
Jumping Jacks Drac Vermell InternetJeb It would be delightful to have an actual conversation with you, Jacks, if I could believe that worthwhile dialog was your actual intention. The problem is that you rarely contribute anything of value, Jacks, you mostly just criticize. You voice your disapproval over and over again in multiple threads, daring anyone to challenge your opinions. When someone finally does, your usual reaction is to either respond with some sort of easily disprovable fact, or worse, you attempt to bolster your argument with a lie by claiming to be an authority on the subject. When that fails to dissuade anyone from challenging… Read more »
You would not be delighted to talk to anyone who questions you to answer straight forward honest questions, because you don’t. In other threads you avoid very basic questions, kind of like a politician. I know your old, but do you want to run for a particular office because you have such a plethora of information that YOU think other people don’t have because of there lack of grammar or spelling. Please.
He’s not immature he says he is a 89 year old with great grandchildren. Lol
BSIZZLE
Oh dear. Your spelling and grammar is a mess again. You must have been very agitated when you wrote this reply. No matter. I think I understood most of what you wrote. So let’s be clear here, BSIZZLE. I’ve had no issue in making an effort to answer your questions concerning my own libertarian principles, However, I have refused to answer your other questions concerning my personal life, and I’ve done so for what should be obvious reasons to you. I really don’t understand why seem so surprised by this. Is it because you’re under the delusion that you’re in control here, BSIZZLE?