In a video produced by Vibrant.Works and released this week on the Free State Project channel, the mother of convicted Silk Road operator Ross Ulbricht, Lyn speaks out:
Recent Forum Posts
- Victim's come in all shapes and sizes: Robert L. Lamontagne's wrongful conviction April 2, 2025 penguin
- Robert L. Lamontagne vs. The State of New Hampshire: I've Appeared March 31, 2025 system
- A new American civil war March 31, 2025 Leif_Alexander
- Please, Show Some Decency March 21, 2025 system
- Demand Letter to Keene Police RE: 91-A Compliance March 17, 2025 system
Other Cool Sites
Censure at the very minimum.
Yeah and maybe a time out, too. Really, a censure?
LOL. This is whole petition thing is pretty useless. Didn’t they just ban a committee in charge of petitioning?
Many signatures could motivate other reps to move on it.
i signed it 🙂
The House did just abolish the Grievance Committee; however people still have a right to petition the governments for a redress of grievances. This right is recognized by Article 31 & Article 32 of the NH Constitution, as well as the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.
Her party is in power. I honestly think aiming for a censure could be aiming too high.
[…] View original article. This entry was posted in Liberty News by admin. Bookmark the permalink. […]
hasn’t she been good for the fsp though? Why stop her…..lol
OK New Hampshire, shows us you can stand up for Liberty. Arrest this fat bit@h for treason and sedition! It’s about time we make an example out some of these Communist and Marxist jerks.
I’m not advocating that she be arrested, simply be censured or impeached from the Legislature. As a State Rep. it is a violation of her oath of office to advocate harming a segment of the population (Free Staters) for the benefit of another segment of the population (those the who support big gov’t).
I never advocate for her to be arrested, I’m advocating she be censured (which is essentially the Legislature saying “we don’t condone your comments/actions”) or impeached (removed from office).
As an elected “representative” there are certain things she is not allowed to say; and her advocating for the removal of rights from one group of people to benefit another group of people is a violation of her oath of office.
As I’ve noted elsewhere, such an action would be construed as being fundamentally the same as a Bill of Attainder (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder), which is prohibited by the Constitutions NH and the US. Proposing something like that is /definitely/ cause for impeachment.
[…] more information on the back story of the attempt to have the House censure a Rep.; seehere, here, here, here, and […]
[…] more information on the back story of the attempt to have the House censure a Rep.; seehere, here, here, here, and […]