As you may know, in late 2014 the NH supreme court decided against Rich Paul’s appeal, claiming the “jury nullification” bill of 2012 was not in point-of-fact, a jury nullification bill. Turns out the 2012 law was gutted prior to passing and the rejected wording was more like JR Hoell’s 2015 edition of the bill, HB 470. Hoell’s bill was heard this week by the NH house judiciary committee. Here’s the full video of the hearing, which in addition to liberty-loving activists speaking, includes the “justice” bureaucrats trying their best to dissuade the committee from supporting having the jury being informed of their full rights:
Search Free Keene
Recent Forum Posts
- Victim's come in all shapes and sizes: Robert L. Lamontagne's wrongful conviction April 2, 2025 penguin
- Robert L. Lamontagne vs. The State of New Hampshire: I've Appeared March 31, 2025 system
- A new American civil war March 31, 2025 Leif_Alexander
- Please, Show Some Decency March 21, 2025 system
- Demand Letter to Keene Police RE: 91-A Compliance March 17, 2025 system
Archives
Categories
Recent Posts
- Victim’s come in all shapes and sizes: Robert L. Lamontagne’s wrongful conviction April 2, 2025
- Robert L. Lamontagne vs. The State of New Hampshire: I’ve Appeared March 31, 2025
- Please, Show Some Decency March 21, 2025
- Demand Letter to Keene Police RE: 91-A Compliance March 17, 2025
- The Keene Police Are Not Cooperating With Record Requests As Required By Law March 10, 2025
- Robert Lamontagne vs. The State of New Hampshire March 4, 2025
- Free Ian rally Jan 16th @ 10AM in Concord, NH January 10, 2025
- Stand With Us for Ian Freeman’s Freedom! November 1, 2024
- State v. Joseph Hart – The Conclusion (and letter to Judge Guptill) August 16, 2024
- Marijuana Dispensary and Grow Operations Should Be Armed Like Nuclear Power Plants August 11, 2024
[…] By Ian Freeman […]
[…] See more coverage at FreeKeene.com […]
[…] See more coverage at FreeKeene.com […]
Some members and proponents see laws as cast in stone never to be questioned. Never mind the reality is that a very involved system has been established to revise and create new law to supersede the old. If laws can be revised and created annually, just maybe they should not be held in such high esteem. The reality is that law is a snapshot of societies opinion at a given time and subject to change at the whim of society. Members of that society, a jury, may have the same foresight and need to be free to exercise. The legislatures… Read more »
The reality is that law is a snapshot of societies opinion at a given time You’re wrong there. The law is neither a snapshot nor is it society’s opinion. There are laws on the books that were enacted by people whose grandchildren died of old age generations ago, mixed in with laws passed this year. That’s not a snapshot, it’s an encrusted aggregation. As for the law being society’s opinion, that’s false too. The law is the opinion of the legislature, not of society. According to a Rasmussen public opinion survey released last week the percentage of US voters who… Read more »
this is like begging for a permission slip to have a revolt
Q: “Will NH House Pass Improved Jury Nullification Bill” ?
A: No. Next question.
[…] and the NH State House’s judiciary committee is still entertaining testimonies that support not informing jurors of their full rights. Troubling to be […]
[…] and the NH State House’s judiciary committee is still entertaining testimonies that support not informing jurors of their full rights. Troubling to be […]