by Ian | Oct 1, 2013 |
Darryl posted a bunch of live tweets during today’s Robin Hood “evidentiary hearing”, day 3 of 3. Below is an archive of all the tweets from today, day 3, in reverse chronological order (starts at the bottom). In case you missed the tweets from the other days, here they are: Day 2, Day 1.
Stay tuned here to Free Keene for the latest on Robin Hooding. Video from both day two and three is still to come.
Darryl W. Perry ?@DWPerry78 3h
Court is out #robinhoodtrial
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
Darryl W. Perry ?@DWPerry78 3h
Kissinger says he will issue a decision after reading further memoranda of law #robinhoodtrial
Expand
Darryl W. Perry ?@DWPerry78 3h
Again comparing public employees is public to employees who have desk jobs #robinhoodtrial
Expand
Darryl W. Perry ?@DWPerry78 3h
“I think we’re starting to repeat ourselves” – you don’t say!?! #robinhoodtrial (more…)
by Ian | Sep 30, 2013 |
Were you unable to attend day 2 of the Robin Hood “evidentiary hearing”? Here are literally hundreds of tweets from Darryl W. Perry, who also tweeted out day one of the hearing. The tweets are in reverse chronological order, so start at the bottom for the beginning.
Be sure to come out tomorrow at 10am to “superior” court in Keene for the allegedly final day. (Remember, this is just the “evidentiary hearing” to allow the judge to issue a “preliminary injunction” if he so decides.) It has taken two full days and the prosecution has yet to still close their case.
Darryl W. Perry ?@DWPerry78 2h
Court resumes tomorrow at 10am #robinhoodtrial
Expand
Darryl W. Perry ?@DWPerry78 2h
Garret began interacting with PEO’s after Cantwell made a video & Jane said he had nothing intelligent to say #robinhoodtrial
Expand
Darryl W. Perry ?@DWPerry78 2h
Garret explaining the difficulties of Robin Hooding from a 30 foot distance #robinhoodtrial (more…)
by Ian | Sep 27, 2013 |
Kudos to the Sentinel for being first to press with the story on the 2nd lawsuit the city has filed against Robin Hooders. In it, the city attorney finally admits it’s about the revenue, but adds a lie to the mix:
Any significant loss of revenue has more to do with officers writing fewer tickets than in the past because they’ve been distracted by the alleged harassing behavior, he said.
It’s either a lie or city attorney Thom Mullins doesn’t understand how Robin Hooding works. The Robin Hooder should be positioned in front of the parking enforcer, filling meters before the enforcer can reach them. That is why they are writing fewer tickets, it’s not because they are distracted! Just admit it, Thom – you guys are pissed that you have missed out on at least $25,000 in revenue this year because Robin Hooders have saved well over 5,000 motorists from being victimized by your agents!
Here’s the story from the Keene Sentinel’s Kyle Jarvis: (more…)
by Ian | Sep 27, 2013 |
The critics say they think Free Keene is irrelevant, but yet they create facebook groups to oppose the local liberty activists and have even counter-protested us. The newspaper this year even asked all political candidates a question about how the “city” should “deal” with the “Free Keene movement”!
Oh yeah, and googling “Keene” reveals Free Keene in the top ten results.
Yep, totally irrelevant!
If your liberty movement isn’t receiving opposition like this, you might be doing it wrong. Move to New Hampshire as part of the Free State Project and make your activism for liberty count! For maximum fun, come to Keene – here are over 150 reasons to do so.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
by Ian | Sep 25, 2013 |
If you thought the first case against Robin Hooders was ridiculous, have I got news for you:
The people calling themselves the “City of Keene” have now filed another lawsuit against the same Robin Hooders (and Pete Eyre, who has never Robin Hooded) in Cheshire “superior” court. This time, they allege the same things as before, that we have cause them damage by “harassing” and “intimidating” their parking enforcers as part of a conspiracy to meddle with their employment contracts. Now, they are seeking monetary damages plus their attorneys’ fees (which are not going to be small, given the huge number of hours they have likely already billed on just the first case alone) and are demanding a jury trial! So if it weren’t bad enough that they are wasting the court’s time with one trial, now they are going to waste even more of the court’s time AND the time of a dozen innocent jurors who could be out living their productive lives.
Hey wait… I thought the city people had originally claimed this wasn’t about the revenues they had lost from the Robin Hooding! In fact, yes, here is the city manager himself making just that exact statement to the Union Leader:
“This is not about revenue. This is not about the city losing any money,” – City Manager John A. MacLean
From the new suit:
37. The City has suffered damages, all within the jurisdictional limits of the Court, for
the following:
a. Loss of an employee;
b. A modified schedule for another employee because of the Defendants’
behavior;
c. Hiring costs to replace the lost employee;
d. Monetary and administrative expenses with regard to counseling and other
Human Resource issues; and
e. The PEOs’ inability to properly perform their employment duties.
Item “e” is another way of them saying “LOST REVENUE”. Looks like the truth has come out. It IS really all about their lost revenue…and the continued attempt to crush the liberty activists in the area. The defendants must file appearances and answers in the case within 30 days of being served with the case. Here is the 2nd lawsuit against Robin Hooders in PDF form, as filed in Cheshire “superior” court on Monday 9/23.
Darryl posted a bunch of live tweets during today’s Robin Hood “evidentiary hearing”, day 3 of 3. Below is an archive of all the tweets from today, day 3, in reverse chronological order (starts at the bottom). In case you missed the tweets from the other days, here they are: Day 2, Day 1. 
