Free Keene

Peaceful Evolution

Parking Tickets and the “Consent of the Governed”

Filed under: Activism, Economic Freedom, Issues, Personal Freedom, Police, Response — Ian at 3:46 pm on Saturday, March 1, 2008

ConsentThere’s been a theory floating around America for the past couple hundred years suggesting that government people gain their power and legitimacy via the “consent of the governed”. As I understand it, in the world of Legal Land, it is commonly held that silence is tantamount to consent. In that, if the government people demand something of you and you either comply or say nothing that you are consenting to their rule over you.

Some of us liberty activists say that that is absurd. We say that the reason people comply is not because they consent but because they are frightened of violent government people hurting them, their family, or taking away their property.

Perhaps it’s not an either-or situation. While it is true that most people comply with government people’s demands due to fear of violence, it is also true that if enough people withdrew their consent and therefore their compliance, government people would no longer have their precious legitimacy.

The question becomes, how will the government people respond when people start withdrawing their consent? Will they behave as the theory suggests and respect each sovereign individual’s choice to live their life how he wants? (As long as he is not harming others, of course.) Or, will they reveal themselves as violent, antisocial thugs?

With that in mind, I have decided to test the consent theory. I will start simple, with the issue of parking tickets but eventually would like to move on to other, more pressing issues such as gambling and drug prohibition and even property taxes. I doubt I will be very effective alone, so I invite you to join the fun. Perhaps we can get our freedom back!

Earlier this week I received a $5 parking ticket for not feeding the meter as I went to check my mailbox in downtown Keene, NH. Thanks to the help of Rich Angell at Sovereign Solutions, I crafted a letter to the Keene Police Department Parking Bureau:

NOTICE OF DISCUSSION

February 28, 2008

KEENE POLICE DEPARTMENT
BUREAU OF PARKING
400 Marlboro Street
Keene, NH 03431-4336

To Whom it May Concern,

I am writing in acknowledgement of the receipt of a “CITY OF KEENE PARKING TICKET” # 60220797, regarding a Subaru, Florida Tag XXXXXX, issued on the 26th of February 2008 at 11:37, demanding the amount of $5.

It is not my intention now, nor has it ever been my intention to defraud anyone. If in fact, I owe such an amount to your agency, I will pay it.

To prove that I am, in fact, bound to such an obligation, please provide the following:

• Evidence of the valid, original contract with my signature binding me to said obligation.

Unless I receive evidence as noted above within ten business days of the receipt of this response (03/13/08), I shall assume that there is no contractual authority for your agency to demand such a “fine” and that I am not obligated to pay any “fine”, with no legal repercussions for any perceived “failure” to do so.

For your convenience and as a show of good faith I am including a prepaid return envelope so as to make your response as simple as possible.

Please note that any correspondence is subject to being posted on the blog at FreeKeene.com

Sincerely,
Ian Bernard
(my address)

So, if I have actually consented, then they certainly will have no trouble finding evidence of that. Of course, I have not consented. In fact, at the time I registered to vote here in New Hampshire, there was a paragraph that said:

In declaring New Hampshire as my domicile, I am subject to the laws of the State of New Hampshire which apply to all residents, including laws requiring me to register my motor vehicles and apply for a New Hampshire’s driver’s license within 60 days of becoming a resident.

Prior to signing my voter’s registration I made certain to cross this paragraph out and initial it. How could I possibly agree to it? I don’t know what all of the laws are in New Hampshire, nor do I care or have enough time to bother reading them. The Attorney Genital’s office even sent someone to investigate me for crossing it out. I told him the same thing. I am not dangerous and will not do harm to others, but I do not consent to be governed by anyone but myself.

How will the parking bureaucrats respond to my letter? Only time will tell. Stay tuned to FreeKeene.com for the latest!

8 Comments »

Comment by Annie Mous

March 2, 2008 @ 1:57 am

I think you are a brilliant individual but, need to have a drink; perhaps a few.

As a parking ticket expert I can tell you exactly what will happen.

1. you’ll get penalty notices.
2. in due time you will acrrue enough tickets they will graduate in to judgment tickets.
3. a judgment will be filed against you in civil court.
4. you will ignore that judgment.
5. your credit reports will receive negative entries reducing your credit score.
6. you will accumulate higher penalites and interest on the tickets.
7. your registration will not be renewed.
8. your insurance coverage on your car will beome invalid (you may have a contract with them I suppose).
9. should you get stopped by police, you will be held acountable for driving without a current registration. should you get in to an auto accident well, your insurance will not cover you because you do not have a valid registration.
10. you can’t inspect your vehicle because of the lack of a current registration.
11. you will incur more penalties.
12. your ticket will not be dismissed based upon the grounds you submitted.
13. you will either pay the fine or incur the above violence.
14. should you fail to pay the fine (your right) and did get stopped driving without a valid registration certificate you might eventually lose your license.
15. aaah the license. Didn’t anyone tell you that when you signed up for a Driver’s License at DMV you contractally agreed to obey the laws?

Sorry it took me until # 15 to identify the answer.

Thanks for the puzzle.
Maybe if it wasn’t 2 AM I would have gotten to it before #10.

Good job !

Comment by Ian

March 2, 2008 @ 11:36 am

No, they didn’t tell me, so the contract is invalid. Besides, that was in Florida. I do not have a NH drivers license.

Comment by Travis

March 4, 2008 @ 6:30 pm

It’s interesting that they even have that paragraph on the voter registration application; its presence seems to be an outright acknowledgment that they require your consent to be subject to NH laws.

Comment by mike

March 4, 2008 @ 9:19 pm

Annie Mous’ attitude is disappointing, bordering on statism. While it’s interesting and potentially helpful to know the government’s official, legal path in their endeavor to aggress against people in this regard, until people start to rebel an the violence of the state is made obvious, the only change will be in the direction of yet worse infringements on our liberties.

Ian, you probably will need “a drink” after dealing with this particular government bureaucracy, so toke up! And thanks for taking a stand and making it public.

Comment by Josh

March 5, 2008 @ 11:59 pm

Unfortunately Ian, the bureaucrats will simply follow you around causing trouble with your registration. When paying a speeding ticket at my local DMV a few months ago, I was informed that my privilege to navigate the roads of Massachusetts was suspended for failure to pay some ticket I was given some two years prior for needing to replace a brake light bulb. No one is ever aware of such a thing, but it is simply too much to ask for the police to politely inform you that you have a light out; they need to be an earner for the state as well. Basically, I was threatened with a loss of registration in New Hampshire, and possibly having my car impounded if pulled over in Massachusetts for that unpaid ticket. I still have not paid it and registered my vehicle this year without any hassle. Empty threats or are they really that inefficient?

Comment by susan28

March 20, 2008 @ 3:23 pm

so were you able to register to vote after crossing out that paragraph?

Comment by Ian

March 20, 2008 @ 4:18 pm

Yes.

Comment by susan28

March 20, 2008 @ 4:24 pm

interesting. so it’s like a bait clause, they’re just hoping you’ll think it’s mandatory simply because it’s there. kinda like the mandatory-ID signs at airports.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation

Subscribe without commenting