Notice to All Keene Area Government People

July 29, 2008 by Ian
Filed under: Announcement, Corruption, Introduction, News, Obscured Truth Network, Personal Freedom, Police, Response, Thuggery, Video

Keene’s government people are hereby put on notice:

Everything you know is about to change. As each month goes by, more liberty loving activists will be moving into the Keene area. Please understand that voluntary interaction in a free market is the most humane method of interaction for mankind. These ideas of liberty are powerful and infectious. As our concentration and influence build, our ideas will become popular. Your government corporation will lose its most precious element of legitimacy as more and more people choose to ignore your dictates and live as free men and women.

Enjoy your coercive reign of the people in Keene while it lasts. I expect you’ll find your power over others diminishing over time, hopefully sooner rather than later, but I want to assure you that it is going to happen. Therefore, you should start thinking about products or services that you can offer into the marketplace on a voluntary basis, just like the rest of us peaceful people.

As a little taste of what is coming, here’s an what just one Keene-bound activist is doing down in his current home of Texas. Sam from the Obscured Truth Network will be arriving here sometime before the end of this year:

Discuss on the Free Keene Forum!

COG

Sam,

I thank you for choosing Keene.

Resident
http://lpcolorado.blogs.com severin

I don't expect Plano to respond to Sam.

Something I thought you might be interested in. 18% of Americans support secession:

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1531
Rebel

Sam, you're outta control in such an outstanding way that I might have to move to Keene. Your performance was 2 thumbs up, I can't wait to see your work with activists behind you! I'm so excited right now that I've ruled out joining the local blue-light gang. I want to be on the good side of the law: private law. Thx to you and Ian for all the lessons. I think my soul has been saved.
Jeremy

"I do what the judge tells me to!"

Sam should run for judgeship and then tell that guy to go jump in a lake.
The Central Scrutini

Well done Sam! Had I known this is what you were up to I would have definitely made your acquaintance at Porcfest. As a native New Hampshirite and friend of the Free State Project, I look forward to aiding you to the best of my ability once you arrive in NH. You, sir, are a true patriot.
http://speakoutdanville.org/bbs Curt Springer

There is nothing in the Texas Bill of Rights that says anybody has a right to bring a camera into a court room.

Sam is a jerk, harassing low-level court staff who need their jobs to feed their families (I presume).

Here is a link to the Texas Bill of Rights: http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/txconst/articles/cn00…
Andy

Addressing Curt Springer:

Unless there is a specific clause or code forbidding cameras from the courtroom, then the liberty of such a decision is within the right of any individual to film any proceedings as they happen on public property. If it is legal to attend public hearings and later report on them, how is it not within someone's rights to tape record or film such a hearing? Unless it is expressly forbidden in the federal or state constitution or unless the right is expressly reserved to one of the branches of government within said constitutions, then the right is reserved to the people. Know your constitutional law
http://speakoutdanville.org/bbs Curt Springer

Andy,
From the NH State Constitution:

[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts. The rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law.

November 22, 1978

The last sentence, which is key to this discussion, was controversial at the time. It is alleged that it did not appear on the version that appeared on the ballot of the statewide referendum vote.

Regarding the situation in Texas, I admittedly don't know much about Texas law. Sam said there was a specific provision in the Texas bill or rights. I found none.
http://speakoutdanville.org/bbs Curt Springer

PS: You might also find this of interest regarding rights of open proceedings, use of cameras, etc.

Petition of WMUR
Zecharo

Curt, Sam is hardly harrassing anyone but I would find the opposite to be true. The bureacrats are harassing Sam for his recording them so that their mistakes may be seen.

Why are these bureacrats so afraid of being recorded and why do you want them protected Curt? Where there is injustice one should protest or else injustice will spread.

You would seem to free these court officials from any responsibility whatsoever. As it stands now bureacrats simply need follow the law. If they do this, they will have complete impunity in the eyes of the sheeple like yourself. Look where this immunity for bureacrats has led us. Millions of harmless men and women who harmed no one have ended up in jail, costing tax payers billions of dollars and creating victims where there were none before (I am referring in part to drug laws which punish people not for hurting others, but for making a personal choice).

The law creates immunity for the unjust actions of government bureacrats and to think that the law transforms unjust actions into just ones is perhaps the greatest lie ever told.
http://speakoutdanville.org/bbs Curt Springer

Zecharo,

The people Sam interacted with in the video were not bureaucrats. They are low-level staff. They don't set policy. By definition, bureaucrats are people who sit comfortably in offices.

I don't have a problem with bringing a camera into the courtroom. In Texas, it is probably a matter of making the case to the right people. The guys guarding the courtroom are not the right people. The reason you can bring a camera into NH court rooms is that WMUR petitioned the NH supreme court.
Zecharo

As defined by American Heritage Dictionary

Bureaucracy:

An administrative system in which the need or inclination to follow rigid or complex procedures impedes effective action: innovative ideas that get bogged down in red tape and bureaucracy.

Bureaucrat:

An official of a bureaucracy.

An official who is rigidly devoted to the details of administrative procedure.

Judges are government officials last time I checked and they certainly are devoted to following procedures.
http://speakoutdanville.org/bbs Curt Springer

Did you watch the video? Sam was hassling the cops/guards/bailiffs at the door, not the judge.