Free Keene

Peaceful Evolution

“Green Keene” City Bureaucrats Insist on Paper Records

Filed under: Update — Ian at 1:46 pm on Friday, November 27, 2009

Anyone who spends much time paying attention to the city’s politicians and bureaucrats will hear all kinds of talk about being “green”. Personally, I find it all very silly, but it will serve to point out their hypocrisy. Wallace Nolen used a freedom of information request to attain information on all of the city employees. He specified that he wanted it in electronic format, but the city refused, insisting on giving him pages and pages of documentation. Wallace sued and the judge (of course) found in favor of the city. So, rather than just emailing Wallace the info, they instead will unnecessarily spend money on paper and ink and print out a bunch of papers. Perhaps their motto is, “The City of Keene: We’re ‘green’, but only when it benefits us.”

Here’s the Keene Sentinel story with the details:

A Cheshire County Superior Court judge has dismissed a Vermont man’s right-to-know lawsuit against the city of Keene.

Judge John P. Arnold ruled earlier this week that the city responded appropriately to Wallace S. Nolen’s public records request. Nolen, of Barre, Vt., asked for the names, titles, salaries, phone numbers, e-mail addresses and work locations of every city employee.

The city provided paperwork to Nolen that contained the information he requested, with the exception of work locations for each employee. No such records exist and the city is not authorized to create a record for Nolen, Arnold ruled.

Nolen took the city to court after it denied his request to have the employee information provided to him in electronic format. Nolen said he wanted the information e-mailed to him so he could plug it into a database he’s building as part of a class-action lawsuit.

The database contains employee information from tens of thousands of municipalities in 30 states, including much of New England, according to Nolen. He argued that it would take too long to copy the employee information from the paperwork the city provided to his database.

In his ruling, Arnold stated that the city was not required to provide the employee information in electronic format. The city had only to make the records available to Nolen, Arnold concluded.

Also, the records Nolen requested, which totaled up to 40 pages, were “not so numerous that the cost of copying or inspection was burdensome,” Arnold wrote.

The city offered to mail the records to Nolen to save him a trip from Barre to Keene and back, as long as Nolen paid copying and shipping costs, which was less than $20, according to Arnold.

Nolen is gathering employee information in an attempt to prove that states consistently fail to notify not only residents but their own employees of unclaimed property to which they are entitled. He wants to overhaul unclaimed property laws and spur banks and state treasurers to be more diligent in helping people claim lost assets.

Nolen’s lawsuit against the city was unique in that it raised the issue of whether municipalities should be required to answer right-to-know requests in a particular format. The law is silent on the issue, but Arnold determined that “as long as the records are made available for inspection and copying, a public body has satisfied its duties under the statute.”

City Attorney Thomas P. Mullins had argued in court prior to Arnold’s ruling that the city wasn’t required to comply with Nolen’s request because he is not a New Hampshire resident. Arnold did not address that argument in his ruling, and provided no further explanation of the issue.

In a separate right-to-know issue, Nolen requested copies of “anything that relates to any criminal complaint” filed against David Ridley, an activist and videographer from Grafton. Ridley was arrested in March at Keene District Court when he refused to turn off his camera in the court’s lobby.

The city gave Nolen the police records in Ridley’s case five days after his request, an appropriate response under state law, according to Arnold.

Nolen requested compensation for attorney’s fees and court costs tied to the lawsuit, as did the city. Arnold denied both requests after determining Nolen’s lawsuit was not frivolous and the city did not violate public records laws.

Phillip Bantz can be reached at 352-1234, extension 1409, or pbantz@keenesentinel.com.

11 Comments »

Comment by thinkliberty

November 27, 2009 @ 4:00 pm

Why would the people that work for the government care about the environment? It’s just another example of how they don’t care about the people.

All they care about is money.

Comment by jzacker

November 27, 2009 @ 5:27 pm

For the cost of going to court, Nolen could have hired someone to transcribe the records into a computer. Or he could have bought some text-scanning software to digitize the information.

But overall it did seem like an interesting case.

Comment by Ian

November 27, 2009 @ 5:36 pm

He wanted to avoid having to do that stuff, and if he’d won it would have meant any future records requests could have been digital. I think he’ll be appealing this.

Comment by ihavehadenough

November 27, 2009 @ 5:41 pm

If this was an environmental issue then where is the concern about the hundreds of pages of documents probably generated by the court process during this ordeal. Not to mention all the peripheral stuff like driving to and from hearings….
Why not just take the paper data and find a volunteer or better yet hire a person who could use the money to key it in. 40 pages is nothing!

Comment by Paul

November 27, 2009 @ 5:46 pm

Yeah, Ihave, it’s a shame that the monopoly court is so inefficient, and bureaucratic. In fact, it’s a shame that the Keene bureaucrats didn’t simply give him electronic records as he requested in the first place, instead of forcing the court case.

But then, I guess they’ll do anything to kick sand in the eyes of anyone trying to get some accountability, or transparency. Why, we impertinent serfs should just shut up and obey. Who are we to question them?

Comment by Ian

November 27, 2009 @ 5:55 pm

Read it again “ihavehadenough”; it’s NOT an environmental issue. I’m just pointing out that the city people are hypocrites.

There’s no shortage of paper. When you use it, they just plant more trees. No problem.

I’m just saying that the city claims one thing, and does another.

Comment by bil

November 27, 2009 @ 6:40 pm

The city records should be provided in whatever format the requester asks.Spanish,for example,or maybe Braille.It would provide jobs for more people,especially minoritys.Papyrus or Sanskrit,anyone??? —bil

Comment by ihavehadenough

November 27, 2009 @ 7:01 pm

Ian…its not the use of the trees that cause environemntal problems with paper making…its the water intense processing and the bleaching and energy to dry and transport that is damaging.
Plus I was just commenting on the environemntal issue already raised by throwing out the Green word and working off of Thinkliberty’s post. Dont be so fucking quick to jump all over people there Ian!

Of course the possibility exists that their system is so outdated that there may not be a way to compile electronically across departments. That was a fact in several similiar sized towns/cities in upstate NY where I did some IT work after Y2K. The payrools were done and submitted seperatly by each department and other than maybe a list of names little was actually in a consolidated database. They also had an issue with exporting a file in a basic format that could be useful. Everything that came out was a left registered fixed field file in ASCII. Anyone who knows what that means knows that there a lot of useless characters say zeros or * to act as place fillers. An electronic file was doable but the value in any other system was minimal. Almost as much needed to be done to stroke the file for import as would be needed to just key it in. I would not be surprised if Keene was that bad of also.

Comment by theKINGofKEENE

November 28, 2009 @ 11:29 am

.AWRIGHT!…Which one o’ youse clowns is impersonating IHAVEHADENOUGH???…Did they up your meds, dude? You sound almost decent there…*AND* is ANYBODY* gonna comment on the OTHER HALF of Nolen’s suit???…Everything on Dave Ridleys’ arrest???…What’s up w/that???….

Comment by Tumbleweed

December 2, 2009 @ 8:52 pm

Sounds like they just didn’t want the records online for activists to get a hold of but barring a refusal to supply the records, the next best angle was to make the medium the records came on into a deterent in itself.

Comment by bil

December 4, 2009 @ 8:50 pm

I am surprised that a group that professes to decry the use of their ’stolen’money being used to support government doesn’t mind the same ’stolen’ money being wasted by a city employee using time to put this on a format that can be done by the person asking for it.Make up your minds-some of the ’stolen’ money is mine,too! —bil

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation

Subscribe without commenting