Westmoreland Statist Pam Martens Continues Anti-Freedom Crusade
From the Keene Sentinel. Be sure to click to the article to see the usual hate and fear-based comments about “free staters”:
To hear Russ Kotfila tell it (Westmoreland witch hunt must stop, Keene Sentinel, March 23), Free Staters are the quintessential upstanding citizens and those questioning their well established goal to infuse 20,000 ultra libertarians into New Hampshire to take over local and state politics are off on a witch hunt.
Mr. Kotfila seems to be suggesting that resisting or even talking about this influx is somehow unseemly and “will not be tolerated any longer.” For one espousing tolerance for Free Staters, Mr. Kotfila seems harshly intolerant of those who don’t feel warm and fuzzy about the Free State agenda.
A majority of Free Staters currently in New Hampshire have indicated they want to replace public education with home schooling and private schools; they want to end all government regulation of businesses, from licensing manicurists, to getting drivers licenses, to elimination of planning and zoning boards.
They don’t believe government should be able to mandate taxation to pay for schools, roads, Social Security or any social welfare programs like nursing homes.
Most people don’t agree with the platform of the Free Staters. When people find out Free Staters have landed in their small town and are seeking to influence elections, they have a right to untrammeled debate on these issues. The alternate choice is to simply hand over the state and its towns to Free Staters.
Mr. Kotfila offers an odd ending to his witch hunt thesis: “When the rules of civility are violated the rights derived thereof are forfeited.”
Rights are derived not from civility but from engaged citizens in a participatory democracy. Mr. Kotfila, a selectman in Westmoreland, should temper his rhetoric lest it appear he is attempting to silence those opposing the Free State agenda.
PAM MARTENS
681 River Road
Westmoreland
Gandhi’s famous quote is as follows:
“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.”
Tick tock, Pam.
Comments
23 Comments on Westmoreland Statist Pam Martens Continues Anti-Freedom Crusade
Comments posted here, just in case they don’t make it on the sentinel:
Re, Zap:
“What freestaters want is to be free from any responsibility for anything but themselves.”
That’s not true. I want to help others — in fact, I believe I have an obligation to do so. What I don’t believe is that I have a right to threaten my neighbors, in order to force them to support my goals. I donate hundreds a month to charity — I just don’t support the government so called “charity”.
Apparently you do believe you have the right to threaten others, to control their lives and finances, and that’s what’s sad.
“They believe that the ‘social contract’ that makes it possible for all of us to live together in relative peace and safety doesn’t apply to them.”
Precisely what is this contract, how was it formed, and why is necessary to “peace and safety”?
“They seem to live under the misguided notion that they should be able to do whatever the heck they want regardless of the impact their actions have on their neighbors.”
Actually, quite the opposite. I believe if I harm others, or their property, I should make restitution for the damage I have caused.
“We are often held up as an example of how people should be allowed to live. Many countries envy us.”
No doubt, many are far worse.
“The freestaters, spoiled brats that they are, have absolutely no idea what they are trying to destroy.”
I’m not trying to destroy anything. I just want to move towards a society where we respect our neighbor’s choices, as long as they don’t harm others.
It’s the same standard for decency we have in our daily lives — we don’t go around threatening people who eat things we disapprove of, or mugging people in order to fund our charities.
We need to stop using aggressive violence. It’s not any more acceptable in our “political” lives, than in any other context.
“If you really want a “free state” I suggest you try it out by moving to one of the many lawless countries of the third world. We don’t call them “failed states’ for nothing.”"
Most of them have lots of people trying to use the threat of violence to rule over each other. That’s what I oppose, remember?
Re, remember Grafton:
I have no idea what you’re talking about. Where is this supposed “discussion” you refer to? On what site? I think you made it up out of whole cloth — especially since “forcibly” removing people would be absolutely antithetical to the ideas of liberty in the first place.
I think you made up the LSD bit too — I’ve certainly never heard of anything like that occurring.
Re: “concerned citizen”
” Nightwatchman above says this about Free Staters: ‘all prefer to be left alone and to be good neighbors.’
Are you a good neighbor when you disrupt a wonderful family event like the Pumpkin Festival with dope smoking and hurting the image of Keene and the festival with police dope arrests?”
Firstly, I also disagreed with holding the 420 event on that day. I agree that it was a poor choice. But, the arrests were absolutely the choice of the police. I guarantee everyone there would have preferred not to get arrested.
“What about intimidating a judge and a police officer by Free State gangs chanting outside their homes.”
A judge throws innocent people in cages, who had not harmed anyone or anything, and you have a problem with a peaceful candlelight vigil on their behalf? I think your priorities are mixed up.
“What about parading a bare breasted gun toting woman down a public street in Keene.”
I also disagreed with this activism, as did others.
There’s nothing wrong with open carrying, however. People have a right to bear arms — I don’t see you whining when the cops do it.
“What about a gang of Free Staters going into the State house with guns on their hips.”
Again, open carrying is their right. What’s with your obsession with guns? Did they brandish them? Attack anyone? No.
“How about using Free Talk Live radio to insult and bully anyone who disagrees with you.”
I listen to the show sometimes, and I don’t think they insult and bully people. That said, the show is run by two people. I think you should stop drawing generalizations, and collectivizing. People are responsible for their own actions.
If you want to talk about “bullying”, how about threatening to kidnap and cage anyone who consumes a substance you don’t personally approve of? THAT’s bullying.
“You can repeat and repeat what good neighbors you are but the facts simply don’t support your illusion.”
Again, I suggest you refer to individuals, as good or bad neighbors, based on their own specific actions. It’s no better to say “all free-staters” are one way or another, than to say “all blacks”, “all Presbyterians”, or “all dentists” are one way or another.
Generalizing, and collectivizing people, is a bad idea.
Re: “Just another mob”
” These “free staters” are just another mob trying to control the population and force them to think like them, that’s all. It’s no wonder they get along with republicans so well. ”
Actually, just the opposite. The “free staters” and other liberty minded individuals, are unique in that they don’t want to control you. They want you to be free to use your life and finances as you choose, as long as you don’t harm others.
Re: disengenuous
What an appropriate name! Your guilt by association smears, etc, are absolutely dishonest. Let’s go through this, shall we?
“” Thom, as you try to figure out who you are politically, you are playing verbal games about the Tea Party/Free State/NH version of libertarians. Granted there are differences of opinion, but enough is known to draw conclusions. Nationally, a recent study shows the Tea Party to be largely white, largely male, overwhelmingly conservative Republican and funded by corporate sources. “”
I’m no tea partier, but I note that you begin by dragging race into this. I think that’s dishonorable. Ideas should be judged on their own merits.
What “funding” is from corporate sources? The tea parties are people. I think you are attempting to dismiss their views not on their merits, but by attacking their race, gender, and attempting to associate them with the evil “corporations”. This is shameful.
“The NHLA in New Hampshire chooses to support political themes that are consistent with extremely conservative Republican values – for the most part, but not entirely- yet chooses not to support libertarian ideas that are allied with Democratic causes.”
Like what, for example? They support drug legalization, which is a traditionally democratic cause. They oppose domestic surveillance, and information gathering, such as the real ID, which is traditionally a democratic cause. They support many other efforts for civil liberties.
“Their rating system is biased in favor of Republicans.”
I think their rating system is fine. The democrats in NH are less liberty oriented, that’s the problem. If this were national, the republicans would lose big points for the warfare state (not that the democrats don’t support it too), but at the state level, it does seem that Rs are somewhat better, on average. Sorry, it’s the truth. Start running liberty candidates, and I’ll vote for them.
“As to the Free Staters, they are certainly talking of taking over another town, after failing in Grafton.”
Who’s talking about that?
“They have done more to alienate people about decriminalizing marijuana than its worst enemy could do.”
I don’t think so. I think the rallies have been a great success. At least at 420, every day, in Keene, Manchester, and elsewhere, people aren’t getting arrested for victimless crimes.
“Picketing homes of police officers”
A candlelight vigil is not a picketing.
“calling them thugs on a routine basis”
Only when they behave thuggishly, and attack innocent people.
“, paying property taxes one dollar at a time,”
What’s wrong with that? It sounds like a completely reasonable, and actually quite mild protest, against the extortion of thousands of dollars.
“misbehaving in the gallery of the Legislature while open carrying”
What’s with your obsession with guns? Did they draw them? Brandish them? Attack anyone? No. A few shouted in opposition when a controversial vote passed, and they were quickly quieted.
“as well as open carrying while doing LSD during the Liberty Forum in Nashua”
I think this is fiction. And, even were it not, you’d be describing the actions of one individual. Should we try to dig up dirt on individual democrats and republicans, and list them off as if it’s the fault of their political affiliation?
“- after a while you don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.”
huh?
“And, frankly, decent folks are real tired of these kinds of extremists spitting on Congressmen,”
Nice, guilt by association. “These kinds of extremists” eh? Did any free stater spit on a congressman? I’m certainly not aware of it. If so, that would be the action of one individual. I certainly wouldn’t endorse it.
“shouting racial and homophobic epithets”
Who did that?
“claiming this behavior is OK because it is “standing up to tyrants”
Again, who? I think you’re launching baseless smears.
“And if think it is not happening here, then you are not paying attention to what is going on in Keene. And Grafton. And Westmoreland. And Nashua.”
Wow, there must be lots of congressmen being spat on. Please, list the events in all these towns where the dreaded expectoration occurred.
“Either these are your peer groups, Thom, or they are not. There is certainly plenty of information our there to help you decide.”
I suggest he decides what he believes based on the merits of the ideas themselves. Rather than your campaign of smears and guilt by association. I know it’s a radical idea, especially relative to the current state of politics today, but maybe we can actually engage our brains for once.
“And… you can’t deny the social contract if you accept the benefits of your local fire department”
I’d happily subscribe to the fire department, given the chance, but I think competition should be allowed.
“and your local police department”
Again, I should be able to choose to support those who best protect innocent people and their property. Forced monopolies always lead to inferior, and inefficient service.
“and you want government inspected food and water”
Inspections are good, but I’m not sure why the government has to be the only ones doing it.
” and providing for the elderly through Medicare and the poor through Medicaid,”
They’re both bankrupt, and extremely wasteful. I’d rather help the poor and elderly myself, directly.
“not to mention Social Security”
Also bankrupt — the politicians wasted all the money.
“and Veterans benefits”
Woefully underfunded, also.
“and child labor laws and laws that protect children from sexual predators.”
Why is the “social contract” necessary to enforce rules against harming kids?
“Humans are social animals and live in communities. Within a community, the virtue of selfishness, exemplified by Ayn Rand, the Tea Party and the FSP is vastly overrated”
A swing and a miss. I do not believe selfishness is a virtue, and I’m no fan of Rand. Most I know are the same. I support charity, I just think I should reach into my own pocket to do so, rather than my neighbor’s pocket.
“You are a econ guy. Try reading How Markets Fair (John Cassidy) and let all of us know what you think of it. Highly recommended by the WSJ, among others. ”
All right, I’ve got one for you. Try reading “Economics in one lesson” by Hazlitt.
Re: “Who Benefits Who Loses”
” The Free State Project is a corporatist agenda in disguise as a freedom movement.”
Corporatism is government in bed with corporations — which is certainly what we have now, at the federal level especially. It’s not what any liberty lover would support.
“Just ask yourself who benefits, who loses.
Without regulations like wage and hour laws, child labor laws, OSHA, the corporations would have 12 year olds working in sweatshops again.”
The only reason the huge corporations exist as we know them is because of government favoritism, loopholes, etc. The mom and pops, who don’t have teams of lawyers to navigate the red tape, get blown away.
The government is the corporation’s best friend. If you haven’t figured that out yet, with the military industrial complex, Federal Reserve distortions, and after they blatantly handed trillions of our dollars to investment bankers, I don’t know what to tell you.
In a truly free economy, businesses must compete for labor. They must offer good wages, benefits, etc, or they’ll go somewhere else — or, better yet, start their own business (which would no longer require teams of lawyers).
Also minimum wage is unfair to low-skilled workers. If one cannot do $7 an hour of work, one is destined to remain unemployed. A person should be allowed to, say, pump gas for $5 an hour, if that’s what they want to do. Young people used to occupy these jobs.
For example, I know one man who used to hire mid to late teens to pick blueberries, and paid by the pint. They enjoyed it, he enjoyed it, they made some spending money. Then, regulations made this impossible, so he had to buy a machine to do the work instead.
” Gone would be the 40 hour work week.”
Actually, you’re probably right, but not in the way you think. Instead of everyone having to work exactly 40 hours, people could work less, or more, depending on what fits their lifestyle.
“Gone would be the legally required overtime pay.”
I know many people who would prefer to work slightly more, but their companies do not allow it, because they would have to pay them overtime.
People and businesses should be free to make arrangements they both agree on. The main thing helping the big corporations now is barriers to entry, which have been raised sky high. Kill those, and you’ll see thousands of local businesses spring up overnight.
“Gone would be the Family and Medical Leave Act to take time off to have a baby or care for a dying parent.”
These policies, and others, are not due to the law — many companies offer far better benefits than the law requires, and far higher wages. Free choice is what maximizes benefit, for all parties.
“Society has become more kind and more civilized exactly because of regulations on businesses.”
Actually, I’d say we’re more in the control of the corporatists and bankers than ever. Both parents now have to work to maintain a lifestyle that a family with one working parent used to be able to afford.
“The Free State agenda will not give us more freedom or liberty. It will enslave us once again to the corporations.”
Free entry is the key. This is the last thing the corporatists want. You should be able to go down to the corner and start a business today, or start one out of your home.
Again, government, especially at the federal level, is taking absolutely massive amounts of wealth and handing it to their friends. They are not your allies, believe me.
We need local communities providing for each other — not massive nationwide businesses. Freedom is the way to get back to this model — you shouldn’t need 28 lawyers and millions in start-up capital to get the doors open, and you shouldn’t be buried in red tape and taxes, while those who are well connected waltz right around them.
“Why are the Free Staters willfully blind to this reality or is there corporate money behind this so called spontaneous movement? ”
Freedom, and community, is the way to prosperity. Government mandates are at best band-aids to fix problems they have caused themselves. At worst (and usually) they are designed to help favored lobbyists. Often they are actually written by these lobbyists.
My Irony meter just broke when I saw this comment from the article:
grow up wrote on Apr 6, 2010 6:33 PM:
” Pam -thank you for your letter! I wonder how many adults in Cheshire County know that these free staters are targeting our children by standing right outside our public schools.
Grow up free staters and stop trying to brainwash 11 year olds as they walk out of school – isn’t it enough that you smoke on Central Square everyday when our young children are leaving school from participating in sports and clubs? Now you stand just a few feet away with you banners and handouts – shame on you!!! ”
Can’t interfere with the brainwashing the tykes are getting the rest of the day in school.
Pam, why don’t you just move a couple of hours east to Massachusetts? You can live in your authoritarian hellhole, and then everybody can be happy.
Why does 100% of this country have to be statist and have big government? You don’t think 1% of this country can be a free state? You’re that authoritarian?
It is good that she is bringing more attention to our movement. We can explain and show what we are about.
I have noticed that I’ve become quite the target of the Statist crowd lately. Apparently I have had the audacity to declare my intentions to run as a Democrat for State House, and I happen to welcome people into New Hampshire who share our freedom-loving values, and this is very distressing to some. They follow me when I comment on the Keene Sentinel blogs in response to blind statist intransigence, keeping a ‘record’ of everything I’ve ever said or done. I’m sure you know this, but there are some very strident Statist activists who troll Free Keene, FSP, and NHLA blogs for the purpose of pulling flip, humorous, or other comments out of context to use against the freedom movement. Of course, they don’t have the courage to post using a real name.
Dan,
Before you send someone packing a couple hours east to the “Hell Hole” of Massachusetts you may want to familiarize yourself with a map of New England. New Hampshire, with only slight exeption, is due north of Massachussets. The area Pam lives in is about half an hour from the hellish boarder of a state you have clearly never been to.
Paul,
Love it. Its been awhile but the delusion marches on full speed ahead. None of you have made a compelling argument to the people you seek to out number and/or displace should they not adhere to your naive and unrealistic philosophy. Even if the Sentinel published your tedius, regurgitated responses are you really breaking through? Its safe to say, having read the comments section, that your “activism” is the ammo people use to build the case against you. Your army of internet shut ins and Cult recruitment fodder has failed to break through in the marketplace of ideas to the general public. how could this happen?
Whats really sad here is Pams need to feed into your groups pathological need for attention in a public forum. This is where you thrive, just waiting to sanctimoniously spew out the same sad contrarian bullshit responses over and over again to a new audience and the circle jerk of your little FK comrades.
Oh, and good luck with the MS Outreach, People really enjoy strangers approaching their children in that magic hour after school where there isnt any parental supervision. Hey!! wait!! Aren’t those the same fucking idiots who are smoking pot across the street every day?I mean what are you thinking? Classic!! Some father is going to see Ian Bernard and Dave Ridley jumping out of a van to approach his 8th grader with a camera and you will certainly get the national coverage your looking for. The headline: Two creepy idiots shot dead in huge preventable misunderstanding.
Dont ever change
Letter I sent to the Sentinel just now:
I see that the vitriolic and hyperbolic Pam Martens has brought her misinformation to the pages of your fine newspaper and felt inspired to respond, as one of the much-maligned “free staters”. Pam wrote:
“A majority of Free Staters currently in New Hampshire have indicated they want to replace public education with home schooling and private schools; they want to end all government regulation of businesses, from licensing manicurists, to getting drivers licenses, to elimination of planning and zoning boards. They don’t believe government should be able to mandate taxation to pay for schools, roads, Social Security or any social welfare programs like nursing homes.”
First, I highly doubt Pam has spoken with a majority of free staters, as there are over 800 of them here in NH. Of course, the New Hampshire liberty movement is much larger than that. So-called “free staters” are merely the backup for the already existing liberty lovers here, many of whom are natives, unlike Pam. What she doesn’t understand is that most liberty-oriented people I know are in favor of many of the things she talks about, minus the coercion. I’m fine with schools, roads, and helping the poor. In fact, I contributed a significant amount to the United Way during last year’s funding drive, because I believe in charity. However, government is not charity. It is force. I cannot support using the evil means of aggression to achieve good ends of helping people in need. We can help people in need without aggressing against our neighbors.
I support education, but not an education system funded by the threat of stealing peoples’ homes, which is how the government system is funded. Roads? Really, Pam? Who doesn’t support having roads? The idea that we can’t have roads without stealing from people is pretty absurd. Please stop the fearmongering. As far as regulation is concerned, I support responsible business, but I don’t believe the government is the organization to keep an eye on them, as I don’t support violent monopolies. It would make far more sense to have competing private certification companies and other market watchdogs, like local media and consumer groups rather than the one-size-fits-all government monopoly regulator/licensing bureaucracy.
Neighborhood associations are consensual ways to influence what your neighbor does with his property. Planning and zoning departments of government are again, just more monopolization and violence. Houston proves there is no need for zoning. It’s one of the largest cities in America, and is unzoned. Pam and others with a penchant for controlling people’s property should just move into deed restricted areas. Then they can argue over which paint color is appropriate. The rest of us who just want to be left alone should not be forced to have to deal with people with control issues.
The only part Pam got right is that free staters don’t tend to like taxation much. That’s because taxation is theft. Please stop supporting theft, Pam. It’s not very neighborly. I don’t know who Russ Kotifla is. She claims he wants to stifle debate, but I and the other liberty-minded people in this area are more than happy to discuss these issues. In fact, I have invited both Pam and her husband Russ onto my nationally syndicated radio program to have that discussion, and she hasn’t even bothered to return my call or email. I even invited her into the studio so she needn’t fear being hung up on. What are you afraid of, Pam? Perhaps it’s the fact that you support a system that is inherently violent against peaceful people? Perhaps it’s because all you have in your corner are wild misrepresentations of the liberty viewpoint? It must be difficult to logically defend a system of institutionalized violence. No wonder she resorts to blasting out misinformation about those of us who support liberty.
Pam states, “Most people don’t agree with the platform of the Free Staters.”
That may (or may not) be true, but it is equally true that “most people” have been (willfully?) brain-washed and conditioned by the government schools (aka., “the mandatory-government-youth-indoctrination-centers”)as well as the statist/fascist/corporatist media into supporting the corporate tax-slave state.
Whatever, Name (Required), she should move “southeast” instead of east. Was there any point to your “correction” other than to be an ass?
It always amuses me how those who “pretend to care more than anyone else” are “all good” and need to use a GUN BARREL to ram their ideas down our throats.
And they think of themselves as kind and caring. How dishonest is that.
Ian spiked Pam’s nearly perfect lob.
Excellent explanation of the radical position of peace as juxtaposed against the most common knee-jerk fears of Statists.
No, really, the people of Westmoreland are just all so pissy lately, because their over 100-year old, sacred-cash-cow, the County Jail, has now moseyed over to Marlborough. OOPS!, I mean, “Far-East Keene”…The craziest “freestater/keener” *I’ve* met has been at worst, not even half as dangerously deranged-sounding as this “Pam Martens” bimbo…Look at all the free publicity she has helped generate! It’s bimbo-idiots like her who drive a lot of the major media publicity. What precious little there is!…
Re: “Think again”
” You freestaters can type up all the thirty paragraph letters trying to justify your actions that you want, but the bottom line is that I was born here and have lived here all my life, and now YOU are trying to tell ME how I should live.”
I’m a Keene native too, and I think this is the height of irony. No one is telling you how to live — the whole point of liberty is that you can live as you choose, and I can live as I choose, as long as you and I don’t harm others, or their property.
If what you want to do is threaten your neighbors in order to extort money from them, or force them to make only personal decisions of which you approve, it’s YOU who is forcing your will on others. And no, you don’t have the right to do so.
There is no reason that the things the city provides can only be funded by force. In fact, that’s pretty much the worst way to fund any service or good. If force is the only way to pay for things, one wonders why we do not starve, since the government does not grow us food, or why we are not homeless, because the government does not build us houses. It’s really silly.
Forced monopolies are not accountable — that’s why they just about always provide inferior and inefficient service. The examples keep piling up — bankrupt social programs, incompetent but hugely expensive schools, corruption, including lots of free money and favoritism for the well connected, the proliferation of wars, etc. Yet, like some sort of blind religious belief, you keep the faith, that the best way to pay for things is by extorting money from people, and disallowing competition.
Why don’t I let you spend your money on what you believe in, and vice-versa, instead of both of us trying to force each-other to fund our chosen efforts? Why is that so extreme? It seems like common sense, and basic decency to me.
Re: “citizen”
Yes, anyone who doesn’t share your personal views, even if they are completely peaceful, is a “terrorist”. Your open mindedness is truly refreshing.
Actually, here’s the definition of “terrorism”:
“the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes. ”
Now let’s see, who’s using violence and threats to accomplish political purposes? Hmmmm? I just got two pieces of mail, from the IRS and the census bureau, both of which threatened to throw me in a cage or extort more money from me, if I don’t pay them, or give them more information, respectively. It’s how they accomplish all their political goals — by threatening everyone who doesn’t comply.
Praytell, when have I, or any supporter of liberty, sent you a piece of mail demanding money, on threat of harming you?
Can you say, “psychological projection”?
Re: “No thanks”
“You freestaters can call me “brainwashed” all you like, but I call it facing reality. The reality is that my taxes help pay for everything from State parks to schools to pothole repair, and I don’t mind paying for things I use and enjoy.”
Neither do I — but each of us has the right to choose. If I want to buy a cell phone, I’ll pay the company who makes them, and the service provider. But, would it be morally right for Verizon to start sending letters to everyone, demanding that they pay them $100 per month, whether they want to use their service or not? Wouldn’t that be morally wrong? Don’t I have a right to use my money to use a different service, or a land like, if I want?
Also, isn’t this precisely what holds organizations accountable? If everyone had to send Verizon that money, no matter what, would Verizon be motivated to improve their service? Would they be motivated to provide newer, better cell phones? Of course not.
“To think that a country or state can function without taxes is ludicrous.”
Why? Most of the things currently run by government, were not run by government in the past. This includes schools, fire, roads, etc.
“What you people seem to want is just plain old anarchy and chaos, with everyone carrying guns and no one paying taxes.”
No, I support the enforcement rules against harming others, or their property. We need police — but, you should be allowed to subscribe to a different protection service, if you prefer. For example, I want to pay police to top arsonists, murderers, theives, etc, and would happily pay for this. I consider the enforcement of victimless crimes immoral, however, and would not support those activities.
Do you really think it’s moral, to force me to give you the fruit of my labor, so that you can spend it on things I believe are morally wrong?
“Find another state that wants what you offer-you’ll find nothing here but strong resistance from NH natives.”
I’m a native, and I support freedom. Why don’t you speak for yourself?
Wow its gotten to the point where someone is linking the FSP (and all the movers) to the free town project.
Its so funny and very sad.
Love it. Its been awhile but the delusion marches on full speed ahead. None of you have made a compelling argument to the people you seek to out number and/or displace should they not adhere to your naive and unrealistic philosophy.
Oh, lawdy. Another tool projecting his insecurities on to others. He has no legs to stand on, so to cover up his ineptness while revealing his massive ego, this boot-licking statist exaggerates his already weak point by speaking in absolutes. Not even one compelling argument, eh? Bullshit…
Even if the Sentinel published your tedius, regurgitated responses are you really breaking through? Its safe to say, having read the comments section, that your “activism” is the ammo people use to build the case against you. Your army of internet shut ins and Cult recruitment fodder has failed to break through in the marketplace of ideas to the general public. how could this happen?
Ha, ha! Right! Other people are delusional, not you! Never! Yeah, speak for yourself there cultist. More like a death cultist, really. A worshiper of government is far more dangerous then any kind of activism these citizens have engaged in.
Just too funny the irony that you’re trolling on the internets, Hikikomori.
Whats really sad here is Pams need to feed into your groups pathological need for attention in a public forum. This is where you thrive, just waiting to sanctimoniously spew out the same sad contrarian bullshit responses over and over again to a new audience and the circle jerk of your little FK comrades.
Here we go with the crazy talk again. “They’re crazy not me!” he says. Uh, huh. So you sanctimoniously spew out the same bullshit, about other people’s co-called sanctimonious bullshit. What’s this about a circle jerk again? Yeah, I’ve heard the “attention whore” whine too, and it’s a pretty pathetic argument — QQ.
The headline: Two creepy idiots shot dead in huge preventable misunderstanding.
You’re one sick fuck, really. Quite a preoccupation with violence you got there…
Name (required) whips himself and then whispers “I’ve been a bad boy.” And repeats.
Post your comment below. Login in the far right column to get rid of CAPTCHA. If you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!
Want to discuss rather than just comment? Visit the Free Keene Forum.
Supporters of FK
Recent Forum Topics- Keene City Council Contact Info February 8, 2012
- Pledged Free-stater heading to "The Shire" later this year February 8, 2012
- FBI is watching February 7, 2012
- New February 7, 2012
- Free Minds Radio 02/05/2012 February 5, 2012
- HELP . . . Still unable to access . . . February 5, 2012
- Marijuana decrim bills up for vote February 5, 2012
- Episode 35 - Anarch-Elitism February 5, 2012
- HB 1533 -- fines for hurting legislators' feelings February 4, 2012
- HB 1494 -- "Your papers, please" February 4, 2012
- Recent Forum Posts
- Re: Keene City Council Contact Info February 9, 2012
- Re: What I wrote to the Chief of Police in town of Weare February 9, 2012
- Re: What is the latest on Sam Dodson February 9, 2012
- Re: What is the latest on Sam Dodson February 9, 2012
- Re: What is the latest on Sam Dodson February 8, 2012
- Re: What is the latest on Sam and New angle on trolling? Hmm. February 8, 2012
- Re: Bearcat petition at city council meeting February 8, 2012
- Re: What is the latest on Sam Dodson February 8, 2012
- Re: Keene City Council Contact Info February 8, 2012
- Re: What is the latest on Sam and New angle on trolling? Hmm. February 8, 2012