Pete Denied Removal From Robin Hood Case
Apparently because Pete, (who has never actually Robin Hooded) one time gave the location of a parking enforcer over a two-way radio and also once spoke to a parking enforcer at some point in the past, he is a valid defendant in this case, according to a recent filing and order from Cheshire superior court.
According to the objection filed by the City of Keene’s hired-gun private attorneys, Pete’s actions make him “directly involved” and “connected”. Apparently now anyone who has told a Robin Hooder where to find a parking enforcer, could be named in the lawsuit.
Judge John C. Kissinger then denied Pete’s motion to remove his name from the case.Want to discuss rather than just commenting here? Visit the Shire Society Forum.