Pete Denied Removal From Robin Hood Case

peteApparently because Pete, (who has never actually Robin Hooded) one time gave the location of a parking enforcer over a two-way radio and also once spoke to a parking enforcer at some point in the past, he is a valid defendant in this case, according to a recent filing and order from Cheshire superior court.

According to the objection filed by the City of Keene’s hired-gun private attorneys, Pete’s actions make him “directly involved” and “connected”. Apparently now anyone who has told a Robin Hooder where to find a parking enforcer, could be named in the lawsuit.

Judge John C. Kissinger then denied Pete’s motion to remove his name from the case.

Now you can subscribe to Free Keene via email!

Don't miss a single post!


Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x