Those of us who wish the violent monopoly known as the state would disappear are not going to see our goal met for what I believe is an extended amount of time.
Question: Would you as someone who believes in liberty (or as someone who agrees with the state) be willing to make the following compromise:
The state will be unable to enforce “crimes” against someone unless there is a bona fide complaining victim who was harmed or endangered. The punishment for endangering or harming someone will be twice that is currently is.
The state would still be allowed to use violence to enforce coercive taxation.
I’m curious to your thoughts/opinions.
