The freedom-fearing folks of “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” have apparently started an anonymous blog site. The site claims on its “Get Involved” page, “we believe in transparency”, yet readers have no idea who is writing the articles.
Of course, actual transparency can be found here at Free Keene. We have a list of all our bloggers, biographical information, and even photos of each, and have had it from the beginning of Free Keene’s existence. Each blog post here at FK is attributed to a specific blogger, unlike SFK’s site.
Another important difference is that FK’s bloggers are willing to talk with people who disagree in real life and online, whereas many of SFK’s members thus far have shown an unwillingness to communicate with their neighbors. Their blog’s comments are moderated, meaning each comment must be approved by the site admins. (EDIT/UPDATE: They appear to have changed their moderation settings to either allow all comments or allow all after one approval, as I am now able to post without pre-moderation.)
In contrast, the Disqus commenting system we have here at Free Keene allows anyone to post, though there is a moderation system which at times on its own will hold up certain posts. Those auto-moderated posts are usually approved, provided they are not spam, racism, or advocating violence. People masquerading as others are also not welcome to comment at FK. However, anyone can post here with anonymity and by default comments are not moderated.
In real life at the recent “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” silent protest, I am told there was a middle-aged man (not a liberty activist) who came up and attempted to talk to SFK’s Joshua Erickson, (one of the administrators of their facebook group, a self-described socialist) and inquire of him about their protest. Josh apparently refused to speak to the man, but Free Keene blogger, James “Robin Hood” Cleaveland was more than happy to talk to the gentleman when he inquired, and they had a great conversation. (Some of which you can hear in the background of the video from the event.)
To SFK’s credit, they did have an awesome turnout at their event. Unlike their predecessor, the long-defunct “Keene Matters” blog from 2007, SFK actually has a real-life presence. Too bad not even the heads of the organization will talk to anybody about their ideas, whatever those are. So much for transparency.
One more interesting thing in the realm of transparency, some of SFK’s members have bragged about their facebook group having over 1,000 members. The reality is, you can easily pump up the membership of a facebook group by adding your “friends” to it without their consent, like this lady who showed up to the recent Robin Hood of Keene “People’s BBQ” and told her story about how she found herself added to the SFK group:
There is no doubt from their recent protest that SFK has real members who are participating in real life, but they shouldn’t be dishonest about their group numbers. Plus, there are even more members in their group now thanks to the recent New York Times article, but even prior to that many SFK group members were not living in Keene. A better indicator of how many true supporters they have may be their Twitter follower count – 25 as of this writing. I’m not saying that is an accurate number (they definitely have more than 25) but that number is interesting because you can’t just add anyone as a twitter follower – all twitter followers must opt-in.
A real-life indicator of their actual level of popularity has been provided by SFK themselves: their dashboard note graphic that informs Robin Hooders their assistance is not welcome by the vehicle owner. When I inquired with Robin Hooders about how often these graphics are seen in vehicles downtown, the answer was there is an SUV that doesn’t use that graphic, just a handwritten note, and that’s it. Come on, SFK – get those notes on display! If parking enforcement is as popular as you think and FK as unpopular as you think, then you should be able to do better!
Also, should be interesting to see who crops up in a SFK t-shirt from their new Zazzle store! I’m thinking it would go well on Bradford Hutchingson with his BEARCAT hat.
Bah, even SFK’s shirts aren’t transparent.
LOL this is fuckin hysterical
The only thing I find hysterical is how you managed to dupe the plebes at FK into buying into your self-aggrandizing horse shit. “Brutalist”, lol. The only thing you’ve brutalised lately was a fucking buffet line.
To the readers of this blog: Blog posts such as this simply show the insecurities the blogger struggles with which prevent him from honestly dealing with opposition. Re Blogging: Bloggers are welcome to post anonymously or by name, whichever they feel more comfortable with. It is well known that FK likes to roast its opposition and some folks are not comfortable with that. SFK!!! is not defined by an arbitrary number on facebook or twitter. Those numbers are comprised of a variety of real people (and “fake profiles” created by FK supporters opposed to SFK!!! –that we weed out as… Read more »
Yeah… a percentage… probably something like “100 percent.”
Here’s a better idea: /you/ remove anyone that you added without their express permission. That’s a simple and /honest/ solution to the issue. No one should have to proactively opt-out after you added them. Adding someone to a group without their express permission is totally-scummy behavior, and puts you in the same class (ie, low) as spammers, scammers, and the like.
I do not add anyone without their knowledge Mr. Shark. And we do not appreciate when people create fake names and fake pages trying to gain access to the group. I think that friends can “add” friends to groups they believe would be of shared interest, but don’t you get notification of that and can opt out? I think that is how it works. it is not at all about facebook numbers so there is no need to continue to argue that point
.
Yeah, so the folks who got added without their knowledge or consent were added by magic, then?
Apparently it /is/ all about FB numbers, since you folks apparently keep harping on that.
It isn’t just about FB numbers, it’s about REAL life numbers. This was only Stop Free Keene’s first protest and it’s plain to see from your own footage that there are ALREADY more of them than you. So how are you going to handle it next time when their numbers are likely to double while your clique stays the same size? Or the time after that?
/My/ footage (etc.)? I have nothing to do with Free Keene. Haven’t been to Keene in probably four years, and that was to fix someone’s furnace. Time before that was to watch the marathon. I have no involvement in Keene politics, at all. I just find you punks disgusting and worthy of negative comment, similar to how I would respond if the KKK held a rally in Keene. But, from what I’ve seen, Free Keene actually has far higher numbers at any of their real events. This was likely the best that SFK could manage, whereas the FK event was… Read more »
I don’t know, Maineshark. There are only a few dozen activists in the region. I’d say SFK is doing very well in the numbers department. The crown always has a decent level of support.
How many of their number are active, though? I’m not considering random hangers-on, but actual, dedicated activists. This was probably the best they could do, and even then, it was just warm bodies holding signs. No doubt the “silent protest” thing was because so many of them were incapable of coherent dialog, and their handlers didn’t want them actually talking.
In terms of those who can manage more than spittle-flecked ranting, they seem to be lacking.
“The crown?” We don’t have a crown in USA, we have “the state.” Big difference. The crown is private property, so the owner has an incentive to protect it. “The state” is the “tragedy of the commons” replacement for the crown. The only incentive for those who control the state is to extract as much value from it as possible before they get voted out of office. That’s why democracies have much higher tax rates than monarchies. That’s why democracies invented the idea of “total war” where “unconditional surrender” is the enemy’s only option and every politician shuns diplomacy and… Read more »
So let’s get this straight: you haven’t been to Keene in four years but you support Free Keene. So you realize that make your opinion worth zilch, right? Nada? Bumpkiss? Zero? Nunca? Why are you even here? Ah, I see. It’s to give the illusion that Free Keene is important… somewhere out there in Fringe, USA. Thank you for proving that Free Keene is bumping up their numbers with out of staters. You’re a doll. 😉
Who said anything about me being in another state? You do realize that Keene is not exactly centrally-located in NH, isn’t on the way to anything of importance, and /most/ NH residents don’t go there, right?
I don’t necessarily even “support” Free Keene. It’s a diverse group. I certainly think highly of some things that some participants have done, think poorly of other things, and am uninterested in a lot of it.
But the fact that your hate group exists is worth protesting. Hate groups are not the NH way.
Regardless, you are not a local so your opinion is invalid. And again, if SFK is a hate group, then so is FK. A lot of SFK members are certainly angry with FK’s practices but that isn’t the same as “hate”. By your logic ANY protest group could be labeled a hate group simply for being angry at whoever they have an issue with.
Actually, yes, my opinion is completely valid. I’ve condemned WBC, and they’ve never held a protest in my town.
And no, being “angry” does not make a group into a hate group. Intentions and tactics do that. As I already discussed… but apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit?
The comparison between WBC and SFK is laughably flawed. If anything, SFK is like the counter protestors that block the WBC from getting too close to funerals. Try again.
Yeah, see, if I was going to say that something was a flawed comparison, I would then follow that with, you know, something like a /reason/ why I believe it is flawed. If I did not do that, those reading my claim would justifiable conclude that there /was no reason/, and I was just /making up nonsense/. Since you didn’t provide any reasoning, I’m just going to conclude that there is no reasoning, and you’re just making up nonsense. Thanks for playing, though. And no, the counter-protestors that block WBC are not even vaguely like SFK. If they were, they… Read more »
What false claims? What physical assaults? What threats with violence (threatening to call the cops doesn’t count. Sorry.)? Are you lumping every random Keene citizen that hates FK in with SFK? SFK cannot be held accountable to what anybody outside it’s group does, and it’s hypocritical to say that SFK is making false claims while simultaneously making false claims of your own. Sources, please. At least SFK has been linking to Free Keene archives and youtube videos to back their points up. I’m not bothering to explain “why” the comparison between SFK and WBC is flawed, because if you can’t… Read more »
Go through the archives, here. They contain actual copies of the posts from the SFK FB page. Et cetera. And yes, actually, I can link others in with what SFK says, since SFK links others in with FK, who are not actually members. /That/ would be the absence of hypocrisy. Trying to include non-FK-members with FK, but exclude those which SFK wants to disavow, would be hypocritical. Your refusal to back up your claims just demonstrates that your claims are without any basis. Not surprising, given that almost everything SFK and its supporters say is composed of lies. What’s one… Read more »
See, when you expect me to do all of the busy work investigating and digging through archives on a wild goose chase, it is clear that you have nothing.
What’s really insane is investing so much time and energy arguing about a local matter in a small town that you have no vested interest in and haven’t even visited in several years. It is clear that you’re are mentally unhinged and absolutely nothing else worth doing in your own life, so there is no point in this conversation. I can’t debate a lunatic.
Wait, you’re telling me that folks should back up their claims? And that it should be assumed that their claims are without merit if they don’t? Well, since you adamantly refuse to back up your own claims, how about we all take your advice and assume they are without merit, then? I mean, since /you/ suggested it, after all. I have plenty to do in my life, but hate groups and those who support them are despicable, so I’m willing to devote a few seconds to opposing them. It’s not like it’s any large investment of time to write these… Read more »
My browser says 38 instances of the word “hate” on this page, and I still can’t find a definition, much less demonstrations of anyone qualifying or not qualifying as a hate group. Mr. Shark, you suggests that “intentions and tactics” determine whether a group is a hate group, but I don’t see what intentions or tactics would qualify. The closest I can come to a guess of your idea of a hate group is a group that lies. I admit, not being a collectivist, I don’t share your belief that groups do things, rather I believe that individuals do things,… Read more »
I would suggest seeing this post: http://freekeene.com/2014/05/12/new-anonymous-stop-free-keene-blog-claims-transparency/#comment-1382983499 Not that a complete definition was given, as none was requested, but that’s a start. The primary defining factor is, of course, a hate-based motivation. That is not to say that the group cannot have other motivations, but that hatred is usually first among them or, at very least, an integral part of the group’s motivation. So, for example, FK would, generally, seem to be focused on attempting to build a particular sort of society. While it’s certainly true that some FK members are no doubt angry at seeing actions they view as… Read more »
Thank you for the reply, and for addressing the meaning of the term “hate group.” You’ve described hate groups in terms of “hate” itself, which is reasonable and appropriate, but unfortunately for me, I still don’t know what you mean by “hate.” Of course I could go to a dictionary, but you’re not using the dictionary definition of “hate group” so it would be unwise to assume the same of your use of the word “hate.” For example, if every group that that has always-right megalomania, claims to speak for the majority, and uses violence-based rhetoric counts as a hate… Read more »
Actually, I /am/ using the “dictionary definition” of “hate group.” So I suppose you can feel free to use the “dictionary definition” of “hate.”
Legislatures and the like are typically motivated by a desire for power, not a feeling of hatred. That doesn’t make them morally-superior to hate groups, but it does make them distinct.
Thank you for the clarification. Ironically enough, I use Webster’s dictionary, and now that I’ve looked, it turns out that Webster’s lacks a definition for “hate group.” So obviously you and I are using different dictionaries. If you wouldn’t mind referring me to yours, I’ll be able to know your intended meanings of “hate,” and “hate group.” I could go with Webster’s definition of “hate,” but since this isn’t your dictionary it may not be giving me your definition. In fact I’m quite sure it’s not, because it gives no definition that is consistent with your usage of the word… Read more »
Your post seems to be based entirely upon the fallacious notion that hostility must be mutual. Since that’s not the case, your entire post seems to be meaningless.
Given today’s date, I’ll point to a good example of one individual demonstrating hatred towards another individual who does quite the opposite: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirk_Willems
Your post seems to be based entirely upon the fallacious notion that hostility must be mutual. My notion of hostility is straight from Webster’s definition of hostility which you can see is, “deep-seated usually mutual ill will.” So if you think that notion is fallacious, then clearly you have an issue with the accuracy of Webster’s dictionary. You’ve already told me you’re using a dictionary, and I asked you which dictionary that is in order that we might avoid such miscommunications, but for some reason unknown to me you are obviously unwilling to share that knowledge. I don’t know a… Read more »
You don’t seem able to grasp the difference between, “usual,” and “always,” eh?
You proposed Webster’s, and I told you to use the definition in that dictionary, so your claim that I won’t tell you which one I’m using is ridiculous; I quite explicitly told you which one to use.
Please quote me the language you used when you “quite explicitly” told me ” to use the definition in [Webster’s] dictionary.” I am searching this web page for the word “Webster” and I don’t see anyone besides me ever using that word.
Maybe you should try searching for “dictionary.”
Anyway, since you clearly know which dictionary is being used, and can’t seem to find anything to do other than complain that you weren’t able to comprehend basic English, I think this discussion may be at an end. I gave you the information you requested, and all you’ve done is complain about the manner of it, rather than the content – if there’s no discussion of content, then there’s really no discussion worth having.
I gave you the information you requested That is not true. You wrote: I quite explicitly told you which one to use. being in the same breath even so bold as to call my claim to the contrary “ridiculous.” In a good faith effort to understand your meaning, I asked you for reasonable clarification: Please quote me the language you used when you “quite explicitly” told me ” to use the definition in [Webster’s] dictionary.” Not only have you not given me the information I requested, you’ve done the exact opposite and attempted to change the subject and avoid the… Read more »
“I’m not bothering to explain “why” the comparison between SFK and WBC is flawed, because if you can’t already see “why” then it’s a pointless exercise to undertake” < in other words, you have no basis for your argument. If you had a basis, you would state it. If you thought explaining yourself was a pointless exercise, then you would not be continuing to post. If you refuse to give any reasons for your beliefs, then it is perfectly reasonable for others to assume that you have no reasons to give.
I do not think you are understanding me Mr. Shark.
Maineshark. It’s amazing what a blowhard know-it-all you are. You are an intellectual giant–at least in your own mind.
And objectively, of course. Not that it matters – folks can be intelligent and still be wrong, or unintelligent and be absolutely right about something. I would never presume that my intelligence means I’m correct about anything. The fact that I’m /correct/ is what makes me correct, and I would be just as correct if I was only twice as smart as you (ie, still well below average) as I am from a point where “average” is too far down to even be meaningful. My kids keep me humble, though – they’re at the “utterly terrifying” level of intelligence where… Read more »
Maine Shark–if you would take 5 minutes to look at the SFK site you would see the activity and realize we are real and fed up with the FREAKEENERS. Stop being suck a pompouss ass and accept the fact.
I don’t doubt that, at all. If you could actually comprehend basic English, you would not have assumed that I did. Certainly, you’re real, upset, and actually have some members (but not as many as you claim). Like Westboro Baptist Church, who are clearly among your peers.
By ‘Silent protest’, I’m sadly reminded of when Plymouth students were shushed by teachers who organized them into an anti-firearms protest. I can’t find the video of it right now, but it was clearly that discussion and open sharing of issues and ideas was NOT welcome.
I found the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49kz5xYonw4
You are wasting your finger strength. Keenesters are juveniles who fap to the idea of liberty, and anyone who questions their methodology or their righteousness is evil and without human compassion. They will never achieve “liberty in our lifetime”. They are nothing more than insecure cultists.
They are, however, trying to understand people who “question their methodology [and] righteousness”. A bit of open discussion, and a bit less of name-calling can go a long way.
A great turnout. I hope the protestors are there for the right reasons, ie improving their community and not protecting a government job of a friend or family member.
What would be the right reasons?
Improving their community.
I would say almost anything without a conflict of interest.
I really don’t think SFK!!! is worth conversing with until their members ascend past name-calling and ad hominem attacks on Graham’s hierarchy of disagreement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_(computer_programmer)#Graham.27s_hierarchy_of_disagreement
Haha. Judging by how you’ve devoted two columns to Stop Free Keene over a couple days is only evidence of how threatened you are of their emergence. I know a fair number of people who joined that Facebook page and they come from all walks of life. Stop Free Keene has no problem talking to their neighbors, it’s just that they don’t consider YOU as their neighbors and won’t until you stop rubbing everybody outside your clique the wrong way and take a step in the direction of actually joining our community rather than using it as a stage and… Read more »
Are you posting on the site you think you are? Free Keene doesn’t rub anyone, wrong way or otherwise. Rubbing requires physical contact, and without consent that would be aggression, which Free Keene opposes. Whatever “Fringe USA” is, if that’s what you’re looking for, you’re on the wrong site.
It is using idiotic semantic tricks like that that only makes the locals hate you even more and uniting us all against you. Keep it up!
Okay, now I see what you’re all about. You’re anti-semantic.
I don’t see anything that would demonstrate that the FK members feel threatened. Disgusted, yes. Threatened, no. I would devote a lot of air time to denouncing a hate group like SFK that showed up in my town. Hate groups like SFK deserve to be publicly condemned; hate is not the NH way.
I just want to express my approval of the “silent” protest. The members of SFK came out in public and demonstrated their core principle: they are opposed to free speech, and they were conducting themselves in accordance with that principle by remaining silent. I may not agree with their position, but I respect them for living consistently with it. It’s unfortunate more of their supporters do not follow their example.
True freedom means not only to have the right to do something, but also the right to NOT do something. Your logic is skewed when you imply that they weren’t using their freedom. Do you think a deaf mute cannot communicate just because they don’t verbalize? Stop Free Keene’s silence was deafening and only a fool missed their point. You guys really shouldn’t have taken their bait and instead ignored them and continued eating your tacos. You wrongfully saw it as an opportunity to show off, but really they beat you at your own game.
Who are you addressing? I am not affiliated with Free Keene, and obviously I got the point of their protest since I re-expressed it in my post. Nor did I imply “they weren’t using their freedom,” nor that a deaf mute cannot communicate.
You say that they are opposed to free speech, so clearly you missed the point.
No one knows what their point was, because they refused to tell anyone what their point was. They were invited to have a civil conversation several times, but decided instead to demonstrate that they don’t have any actual arguments, just anger.
It’s funny how you label critics as hate groups when they are simply doing to you what you routinely do to government employees, so I suppose that makes you a hate group, too.
You know how they say “don’t take it personally”? In this case you should. Nobody hates freedom or libertarianism. Most people around here don’t actually care about politics. It isn’t the message, it’s the messenger, and even if I agreed with you politically I would still want you gone. Even more so because your antics would reflect badly upon me.
I’ll reply anyway :). Just want to address “Nobody hates freedom or libertarianism”. Lots of people hate freedom, they just do not understand why. True, not many people who hear the word “freedom” are going to respond with “I hate that concept!” The problem is, true freedom includes freedom from government. Freedom from government, in turn, implies the need for personal responsibility. People do not want to have to be responsible for things like researching drugs before putting them into their bodies, hiring private companies for services like trash or security, or dealing with more business competition (in the absence… Read more »
Critics, like Free Keene, honestly describe what is going on and seek positive change. Hate groups, like SFK, lie and misrepresent what is going on and seek to prevent change, or seek negative change. So, for example, Occupy Wall Street is, by and large, not a hate group. They describe problems in a generally-honest manner, and seek changes which, if they worked, would have positive results for society. Knowing a thing or two about economics, I can say that their plans are nonsense and cannot possibly work, but they clearly believe in them, and seek to enhance the freedom of… Read more »
Again, you’re talking politics. It boosts your ego to pretend that this group is against freedom and liberty, but the real truth is that none of that has any bearing on why people are uniting against you. They come from all walks of life and many even have opposing philosophies from each other. There are Democrats, Republicans, Anarchists, Apoloticals, Socialists, and yes even Libertarians, among others, all united together under one cause. The only thing that matters is that we are all in agreement that Free Keene is a group of JERKS. The sooner you realize that, the sooner you… Read more »
Someone’s uniting against me, now?
The “real truth,” as demonstrated /by/ the demonstrators, is that they hate freedom. Look at the signs. They go on and on about their hatred of freedom, not the tactics of Free Keene participants.
And you specifically avoid dialog, which is typical of hate groups, but not of groups that actually want to reach a resolution to a problem. The latter go out of ther way to /seek/ dialog.
You’re just a hate group. Go protest at some funerals, or somesuch, with the rest of your ilk.
That’s what I don’t get – why not have a public meeting, where “Stop Free Keene!!!” folks can have a public opportunity to show exactly why they are so opposed to “Free Keene” people, and can explain what they would like to accomplish. I bet “Free Keene” members would even let the other side have the first, and probably even final words.
Sounds like an excellent idea, to me. But SFK would never go for it, if there was any chance that it would be done in a way requiring decorum. SFK’s goals appear to be nothing other than hate, so there’s no way they would be willing to engage in civil discourse where they would have to behave like adults.
I get that feeling, but here’s my perspective here – I have been watching this back and forth between the two groups (only recently, so I will admit I am not super-informed on the dispute), and I am finding it very interesting. Probably the most interesting thing about this is the relative lack of actual points from the SFK side. Now, while I do live in NH, I live pretty far away from Keene, so there is not much I can do here…but man, I would LOVE to see this conversation happen publicly. If it was at all possible, I… Read more »
I’m not an official member of their group, although I am a local and I do emphasize with and support their cause. Do not mistake me for their spokesman. Equating SFK with a hate group is a joke. You’d love it if one of you was martyred with a lynching but somehow I just don’t think you’re going to get the satisfaction. Lol.
You’re not a member, but you refer to yourself as one? That must explain why, despite the fact that I’m not affiliated with Free Keene, you keep claiming that I am, eh? Doesn’t speak very well of your honesty, now does it?
SFK /is/ a hate group, as I demonstrated. And no, they don’t have to lynch anyone for that to be the case. WBC hasn’t lynched anyone, as far as I know, and they’re still a hate group.
I’m not a member of Stop Free Keene, I am a member of Keene. I’ve lived here for more than half of my life, I live here and am raising a family, AND I pay my fair share of taxes. I am a proven part of this community. You guys most certainly are not. If Stop Free Keene is a hate group, the Free Keene itself is a hate group. What else would you call a group that has built up a reputation for harassment of individuals? You violently assault (and by violent I am using the FK definition) private… Read more »
No, as demonstrated above, FK is not a hate group. Nor, as has been demonstrated numerous times, have they engaged in harassment. If they had, the Keene police would have arrested them for it. I’d like to see some evidence of these “violent assaults.” I haven’t seen any intolerance from Free Keene participants based upon “disageement.” Could you provide some evidence of that? I’ve seen them oppose those who take certain /actions/, but not mere disagreement. And no, “tak[ing] employment where they can” is not an excuse. By that light, muggers should not be “harassed” by the police, because they’re… Read more »
Do you know one of their spokespeople? Maybe this issue can be resolved by talking to each other, clearly stating what issues they have with one another, perhaps in a series of open letters? You could post them online, and/or mail them to each other. From across the Atlantic I might not understand SFK’s views if they don’t care to explain their (to me) contradictory messages, but (to me) they seem to bee messages of hate. That does not mean that SFK is a “hate group”, but how am I to know any better without open discussion with the members,… Read more »
[…] Stop Free Keene moderates their blog comments, and won’t allow any dissenting opinions on the …. I did leave the following comment […]
Wow. Imagine someone creating a “Stop Free Keene” concept. What a pathetic person. The word ‘loser’ exemplifies that type of attitude and reaction to freedom.
[…] New, Anonymous “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” Blog Claims Transparency – We have a list of all our bloggers, biographical information … though there is a moderation system which at times on its own will hold up certain posts. Those auto-moderated posts are usually approved, provided they are not spam, racism, or advocating … […]
[…] New, Anonymous “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” Blog Claims Transparency – Of course, actual transparency can be found here at Free Keene. We have a list of all our bloggers, biographical information, and even photos of each, and have had it from the beginning of Free Keene’s existence. Each blog post here at FK is … […]
[…] New, Anonymous “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” Blog Claims Transparency – The freedom-fearing folks of “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” have apparently started an anonymous blog site. The site claims on its “Get Involved” page, “we believe in transparency”, yet readers have no idea who is writing the articles. Of course … […]
[…] New, Anonymous “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” Blog Claims Transparency – The freedom-fearing folks of “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” have apparently started an anonymous blog site. The site claims on its “Get Involved” page, “we believe in transparency”, yet readers have no idea who is writing the articles. Of course … […]
[…] New, Anonymous “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” Blog Claims Transparency – The freedom-fearing folks of “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” have apparently started an anonymous blog site. The site claims on its “Get Involved” page, “we believe in transparency”, yet readers have no idea who is writing the articles. Of course … […]
[…] New, Anonymous “STOP FREE KEENE!!!” Blog Claims Transparency – Of course, actual transparency can be found here at Free Keene. We have a list of all our bloggers, biographical information, and even photos of each, and have had it from the beginning of Free Keene’s existence. Each blog post here at FK is … […]
[…] an impressively large counterprotest in Central Square by then-new-and-energized hate group “STOP FREE KEENE!!!“. He later truly made a name for himself in the War on Chalk that happened throughout the […]