Peaceful secession from the United States is something I’ve promoted this year at mask freedom rallies, Black Lives Matter, and now “Stop the Steal”. I had attended such a rally last weekend, which is heavily attended by Trump supporters, with the intention of handing out flyers for the Foundation for New Hampshire Independence.
I successfully handed out flyers to the bulk of the crowd and they were near-universally well-received. Then I was given the opportunity to speak. Though I was surrounded by pro-America speakers, I reminded the large crowd that even if Trump somehow wins, he won’t stop the government from stealing, that the federal gang is evil, and taxes are theft.
America has failed, I told them. I was not booed off the stage. They surely know it’s true. The point was to plant the seed that it’s time New Hampshire secedes again and says goodbye, peacefully, the United States of America.
It’s long past time, actually. But it’s still not too late. New Hampshire Independence NOW!
Here’s video of my full speech and some highlights from the other speakers at the rally:
[…] By Ian Freeman […]
If he doesn’t know he doesn’t know. Why would he quote a number if he isn’t sure of that number? The city of Keene has a right to “due process”. What I see as hypocritical is freekeeners who take parking tickets to trial. Take issues all the way to the supreme court after losing in lower courts. All of that costs tax payers money. Why can’t the city of Keene do the same? I haven’t heard anyone complain about the money regarding these trials. Only activists.
Jumping Jacks
Tax payers are on the hook for millions when peaceful people are locked up.
Are you willing to end jailing people for victimless crimes or do you have friends that are part of the parasitic “justice system” that prevents the deafening ringing of your personal cognitive dissonance bell from scorching your own ears?
WEEDA CLAUS Yo, Weedadouche:
How about you just go fuck off and get with the program. We make the laws in this country and you have to follow them. If you don’t, we throw your ass in jail. Simple. I have no problem paying for freetards being put in jail. The more, the better.
I love this fat lush. His smug face always tells the camera I’m taking your money whether you like it or not and there is nothing you can do about it.
WEEDA CLAUS Jumping Jacks You said, “Are you willing to end jailing people for victimless crimes” There is no such thing as a victimless crime. The DA represents the commonwealth who are the victims of a crime. Break the law, you suffer the consequences. It’s called being an adult. “Victimless crime” is an agreement between both the prosecutor and the defense that there were no victims. If the DA doesn’t decide to agree with the “victimless crime” it will still be a crime that has a victim.
The rest of your statements are your words and makes very little sense.
Dread Pirate Roberts WEEDA CLAUS
Get with the pogrom? Is that what you meant?
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS
So slaves should have obeyed the law rather than trying to runaway?
WEEDA CLAUS Jumping Jacks To use that analogy is not appropriate.
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS “There is no such thing as a victimless crime.” I know you have trouble understanding many concepts (math for instance) but is it really so difficult for you to understand that words actually mean things? A victim is defined as any person who has come to harm as the result of an event or action. Types of harm can include injury to body or property or even death. Victims can be created by accidental events (acts of God or nature) or by people. But when that harm is committed purposefully by another person it’s called a crime.… Read more »
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS
Malum prohibitum called and said your check is in the mail.
WEEDA CLAUS Jumping Jacks You haven’t presented a decent article to back up your opinions. Now you seem to post these off the wall comments that mean nothing.
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS
“You haven’t presented a decent article to back up your opinions.”
Isn’t that a little unfair? Because in all honesty, neither have you.
Drac Vermell Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS I suggest you look at my posts on other articles. You appear to be a person who is an instigator. Rather than contribute something relevant, you do this. You haven’t presented a decent article to back up your opinions.
Why don’t you look at my first post about this article. I didn’t write anything you would need a decent article to back up my opinions.
Jumping Jacks Drac Vermell WEEDA CLAUS “I suggest you look at my posts on other articles.” I’ve been doing just that. Those posts are why I’ve been critical of your positions in the first place. “You appear to be a person who is an instigator.” No. Instigation has not been needed in any of the discourse I’ve had with you. I’ve simply refuted your positions from the perspective of libertarian philosophy. You should expect this when you post pro-state rhetoric on a libertarian blog. “Rather than contribute something relevant, you do this. You haven’t presented a decent article to back up your opinions. Why don’t you look… Read more »
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS If it’s my opinion, my assertion alone is all that is required, that’s how opinions work. You seem anxious to anoint anything that is legal as also correct. My opinion is that is absurd…and slavish and sychophantic. (sic?) , not to mention morally unsound. Also, you never refuted my claim that there was “legally speaking” no NH Controlled Drug Schedule due to the failure of the bumbling bureaucracy to follow their own laws. Instead of arguing with mischievious old elves here, get your butt out of your chair and over to the Merrimack County Superior… Read more »
WEEDA CLAUS Jumping Jacks You said, “Also, you never refuted my claim that there was “legally speaking” no NH Controlled Drug Schedule due to the failure of the bumbling bureaucracy to follow their own laws”. I posted several links that proved you wrong.
You said, ” Instead of arguing with mischievious old elves here, get your butt out of your chair and over to the Merrimack County Superior Court House and see how laughable and hypocritical the “system” whose proverbial boots you polish is”. That is just your opinion.
Drac Vermell Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS You said, “No. Instigation has not been needed in any of the discourse I’ve had with you. I’ve simply refuted your positions from the perspective of libertarian philosophy. You should expect this when you post pro-state rhetoric on a libertarian blog”. You have proven to be an instigator. Read your post again, You said, “I rarely post links in blogs. I view that as bad form. I prefer to contribute my own reasoning instead of relying exclusively on the opinions of others”. Reasons need facts to back them up. You said, “You rely on links because you lack reasoning skills… Read more »
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS RSA 21:32 called…It said find the newspaper publications prior to July 2011 that were REQUIRED to have taken place ….bet you can’t. (I’m holding an ace or two up my sleeve by the way) You see, RSA 21:32 was changed as part of a coverup. Sort of how the pigs in Animal Farm did things when they snuck around at night changing the laws. Also, since you seem to rely on “official” things, go to Merrimack County Superior Court and pull the court file, CONSTANTINE V TOUMPAS from the winter of 2011. The judges ruling… Read more »
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS Helpful hint for you. , RSA 21:32 is the New Hampshire statutory law on how statutory construction was to proceed. It read, prior to July 2011, that publication in a NEWSPAPER was a REQUIREMENT. The law, RSA 21:32 was changed clandestinely, buried in Governor Lynch’s budget bill….because some guy I know rather well pointed out their legal error to them. This went into effect in July 2011. Prior to July 2011, the NH Controlled Drug Schedule was REQUIRED BY LAW to have been published in a newspaper or the law was invalid. Void… Read more »
Jumping Jacks Drac Vermell WEEDA CLAUS You seem to have a tough time admitting defeat. But I have no interest in engaging in a pissing match with you, so I’ll only address two of your accusations. “Reasons need facts to back them up.” You’ve been proven wrong on nearly every comment you’ve posted (by myself and others) and regardless of the source material you choose to provide. Despite this, you’ve continued to make no effort to improve the quality of your research methods or the conclusions you derive from them. In your latest example (your comments in the thread concerning HB 271)… Read more »
Drac Vermell Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS I’m not going to keep doing this with you. You are trying to start a confrontation with put downs and ignorance. This does not champion your cause or prove you right. You have posted numerous times the ignorance of medical protocols. I can’t educate you about any medication because you don’t have that type of understanding.
Until you stop turning conversations into contests, there is no point of engaging you any further regarding this matter.
WEEDA CLAUS Jumping Jacks Why do you continually pursue this? I have worked in the medical field for over 30 years in NH. Anyone in the medical field knows the scheduled meds have been out there for many many years.
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS It’s also the “opinion” of a New Hampshire Superior Court Judge in Merrimack County after a hearing in that same Court. His written order said, “no local schedule exists”. He was writing about the New Hampshire Controlled drug schedule in the early spring of 2011 when he issued that written ruling. So in “legal land” that is now more than just my opinion. Your pointing to some internet based schedule actually proves my point. When the law on statutory construction (RSA 21:32) was changed in July 2011, it was BECAUSE the state knew that they… Read more »
WEEDA CLAUS Jumping Jacks You said, “ANYBODY charged or convicted of “controlled drugs” in New Hampshire prior to July 2011 was charged under a law that legally speaking didn’t exist”. Good luck trying to get that one to pass.
Marijuana and other illegal drugs were against the law for many many years. A med schedule doesn’t mean anything.
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS There are Supreme Court cases in other states that beg to differ. Also, if you had a full understanding and comprehension of RSA 318 B your error would be evident. The problem is, most people, including government types have never bothered to read the entire statute or connect the dots. Not to mention the existence of “administrative rule making” is an authorized delegation of law making to persons that are not State Representatives. Also, you are silent on the coverup foisted by Governor Lynch and his cronies when they tried to bury the law change… Read more »
WEEDA CLAUS Jumping Jacks You said, “There are Supreme Court cases in other states that beg to differ”. Please post links to these supreme court cases. Again, all 50 states have the same med schedule list. It has been that way since 1970. “The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_government_of_the_United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_policy_of_the_United_States under which the manufacture, importation, possession, use and distribution of certain substances is regulated. It was passed by the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/91st_United_States_Congress as Title II of thehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_Drug_Abuse_Prevention_and_Control_Act_of_1970and signed into law by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Richard_Nixon.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Substances_Act#cite_note-1 The Act also served as the national implementing legislation for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Convention_on_Narcotic_Drugs”. (Wiki) To continue arguing this is futile. These laws have been in place for 45 years.… Read more »
Jumping Jacks WEEDA CLAUS
Nice diversion. Can you show me the published (in a newspaper) NH Controlled Drug Schedules ? No, you can’t.
You see, people in NH are charged with violating New Hampshire law. Also, can you say “Irv Rosenfeld” ? I know you can.