by Highline | Feb 25, 2012 |
I haven’t spoken publicly much about the University System of New Hampshire gun protest that US Army Veteran Tommy Mozingo and I organised back in December as presently I am dedicating a great deal of my time focusing on defending Jason Talley from abuses of the New Hampshire Constitution. Realizing that I’ve procrastinated long enough, I would like to share with you some thoughts about the Grafton Superior Court’s ruling and the state of firearm rights in New Hampshire.
In the opinion of Judge Vaughn, the University System of New Hampshire (an institution which belongs and is answerable to the people of this state) is NOT a political subdivision for the politically questionable issue of 2nd Amendment freedom, but is a political subdivision (by its own admission) for the politically not-so-questionable issue of being able to recoup damages in federal court.
I’m fairly sure that all of the municipalities in this state which serve as host communities to USNH property lose a great deal of tax revenue, while paying outward to provide services.
Why are they not paying taxes to local municipalities?
They’re a political subdivision, of course.
(more…)
by Highline | Feb 22, 2012 |
Or at least people are now calling me a terrorist and calling for my indefinite detention as a result of my taking on the corruption happening in Cheshire County.
maximumfullpower
“Brad Jardis in my observation is a terrorist plain and simple. All he has done along with his so called activists friends has started violence against Judge Burke because they got caught breaking the law. It is a good thing the NDAA passed because Brad Jardis needs to be taken off the streets because of his violence.”
All my violence’eh? You apparently forgot to read this.
Why would they need the NDAA to come after me right now for what I am reporting if I was actually breaking the law? Everyone knows the NDAA is meant to only silence people who would be victorious in court.
Could it be because I am right?
From the comment section of my interview on the Ridley Report.
by Highline | Feb 22, 2012 |
On Friday I am commissioning my first ever official “overview” of government misconduct. The presentation will detail my case as to precisely how Keene Circuit Court-District Division Presiding Judge Edward Burke violated state law, the state Constitution, and judicial canons by telling a lie to have someone arrested. A lie that constituted False Reports to Law Enforcement, a crime under state law. A crime that if the exact facts and circumstances were brought before him in a criminal case where you did the same thing, he would find you guilty.
I am quite familiar with the crime as I have arrested people and prepared prosecution cases for it before. Judge Burke should have been arrested by now for what he did… but lucky for him, it appears that his friends in government are protecting him.
The presentation I will be burning to DVD and distributing to Governor John Lynch, the Executive Council, and every member of the New Hampshire General Court. Every mainstream media outlet in New Hampshire will also be receiving a copy.
Judicial Canon #2, the code of conduct for judges, reads as follows:
A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITIES
I presume that includes impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge’s interactions with members of the free press who are asking constitutionally protected questions. Especially when our own Constitution says:
FREE SPEECH AND LIBERTY OF THE PRESS ARE ESSENTIAL TO THE SECURITY OF FREEDOM IN A STATE: THEY OUGHT, THEREFORE, TO BE INVIOLABLY PRESERVED.
(not taken away in a creative attempt to cover up a criminal offense)
by Highline | Feb 21, 2012 |
I’m on my way to the post office to send the following three letters to high ranking law enforcement officers in New Hampshire regarding the online comments of a threatening tone made against Judge Burke.
– United States Attorney for the District of New Hampshire Kacavas
– New Hampshire Attorney General Delaney
– Cheshire County Attorney Heed
– Administrative Office of the Courts Director Goodnow
I believe the threatening rhetoric involved is protected speech under Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) as it doesn’t seem to infer imminent lawless action, but using or threatening violence is unacceptable in a civilized society.
by Highline | Feb 20, 2012 |
For taking such a firm stance on people thinking threats of violence against public officials is funny or a joke. It isn’t. At all. You don’t do it, ever.
Why? Well a friend of mine, and a known active-duty federal agent in libertarian circles, summed it up rather eloquently:
“Perceived as a threat? Remember, we’re talking about the man who swore upon his office that Ademo threatened him about a ruling he had made, when there wasn’t even any implication that something bad could happen to him.
(Adam Mueller) was asking legitimate questions in a perfectly civil way, yet got thrown in jail for “threatening” Burke. You think he won’t use any trolling or joking as evidence that he’s right?
Remember, Burke is a collectivist. He thinks we’re all one blob-like entity, acting in union. He has zero understanding of individualism. His fellow judges are pretty much of like mind, so some seemingly harmless anonymous comment on a blog, in their minds, is the same as Brad or Jason directly threatening them.”
Remember also, the people breaking the law and Constitution are the only ones who can use violence, not only to solve problems, but to make you respect them.
Burke has the legal right under state law not to be threatened in this manner. He also has legal rights under the 5th Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Part I, Article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution that I hope are read to him rather soon.
Demand government accountability!
