by Highline | Feb 22, 2012 |
Or at least people are now calling me a terrorist and calling for my indefinite detention as a result of my taking on the corruption happening in Cheshire County.
maximumfullpower
“Brad Jardis in my observation is a terrorist plain and simple. All he has done along with his so called activists friends has started violence against Judge Burke because they got caught breaking the law. It is a good thing the NDAA passed because Brad Jardis needs to be taken off the streets because of his violence.”
All my violence’eh? You apparently forgot to read this.
Why would they need the NDAA to come after me right now for what I am reporting if I was actually breaking the law? Everyone knows the NDAA is meant to only silence people who would be victorious in court.
Could it be because I am right?
From the comment section of my interview on the Ridley Report.
by Highline | Feb 22, 2012 |
On Friday I am commissioning my first ever official “overview” of government misconduct. The presentation will detail my case as to precisely how Keene Circuit Court-District Division Presiding Judge Edward Burke violated state law, the state Constitution, and judicial canons by telling a lie to have someone arrested. A lie that constituted False Reports to Law Enforcement, a crime under state law. A crime that if the exact facts and circumstances were brought before him in a criminal case where you did the same thing, he would find you guilty.
I am quite familiar with the crime as I have arrested people and prepared prosecution cases for it before. Judge Burke should have been arrested by now for what he did… but lucky for him, it appears that his friends in government are protecting him.
The presentation I will be burning to DVD and distributing to Governor John Lynch, the Executive Council, and every member of the New Hampshire General Court. Every mainstream media outlet in New Hampshire will also be receiving a copy.
Judicial Canon #2, the code of conduct for judges, reads as follows:
A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITIES
I presume that includes impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge’s interactions with members of the free press who are asking constitutionally protected questions. Especially when our own Constitution says:
FREE SPEECH AND LIBERTY OF THE PRESS ARE ESSENTIAL TO THE SECURITY OF FREEDOM IN A STATE: THEY OUGHT, THEREFORE, TO BE INVIOLABLY PRESERVED.
(not taken away in a creative attempt to cover up a criminal offense)
by Highline | Feb 21, 2012 |
I’m on my way to the post office to send the following three letters to high ranking law enforcement officers in New Hampshire regarding the online comments of a threatening tone made against Judge Burke.
– United States Attorney for the District of New Hampshire Kacavas
– New Hampshire Attorney General Delaney
– Cheshire County Attorney Heed
– Administrative Office of the Courts Director Goodnow
I believe the threatening rhetoric involved is protected speech under Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) as it doesn’t seem to infer imminent lawless action, but using or threatening violence is unacceptable in a civilized society.
by Highline | Feb 20, 2012 |
For taking such a firm stance on people thinking threats of violence against public officials is funny or a joke. It isn’t. At all. You don’t do it, ever.
Why? Well a friend of mine, and a known active-duty federal agent in libertarian circles, summed it up rather eloquently:
“Perceived as a threat? Remember, we’re talking about the man who swore upon his office that Ademo threatened him about a ruling he had made, when there wasn’t even any implication that something bad could happen to him.
(Adam Mueller) was asking legitimate questions in a perfectly civil way, yet got thrown in jail for “threatening” Burke. You think he won’t use any trolling or joking as evidence that he’s right?
Remember, Burke is a collectivist. He thinks we’re all one blob-like entity, acting in union. He has zero understanding of individualism. His fellow judges are pretty much of like mind, so some seemingly harmless anonymous comment on a blog, in their minds, is the same as Brad or Jason directly threatening them.”
Remember also, the people breaking the law and Constitution are the only ones who can use violence, not only to solve problems, but to make you respect them.
Burke has the legal right under state law not to be threatened in this manner. He also has legal rights under the 5th Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Part I, Article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution that I hope are read to him rather soon.
Demand government accountability!
by Highline | Feb 20, 2012 |
I was just reading the comment section on the Ridley Report regarding Keene Circuit Court-District Division Presiding Judge Edward Burke breaking the law and thus far getting away with it. I was very saddened to see the following comment:
I am sending this comment, and every one that is brought to my attention afterwards, to the Cheshire County Attorney and the Administrative Office of the Courts Security Director. Judge Burke may have broken the law, but he also deserves its protection… even if it can be proven that at times he doesn’t afford other people the same courtesy.
Please, if you’re a New Hampshire resident and this upsets you, reach out to your local state representatives and/or state senator. You can also contact the following:
Robert T. Mittelholzer, Esquire, Executive Secretary
Committee on Judicial Conduct
74 Exeter Road
Newmarket, NH 03857
Phone: (603) 292-1825
Fax: (603) 292-1827
rmittelholzer@nhjcc.com
If you see any threats of violence, please, notify the authorities immediately. These things need to be dealt with in a civilized manner.
UPDATE: Unless you’re the authorities, as you’ve already notified yourself (and the public you answer to) that you intend on being violent.
Shame on you.
