Free Keene

Peaceful Evolution

Thank You Mr. Burke

Filed under: Anarchy in Your Head, Corruption, Rant, Video — dalebert at 1:04 am on Sunday, November 16, 2008

The video below shows Ian being ordered arrested by Mr. Burke within a minute of walking into the room and within seconds of Ian opening his mouth to speak. Free speech, be damned. Then Ian is led into another room where nothing can be filmed or audio recorded. Public trial by one’s peers be damned. Then Ian is sentenced to 90 days for one of the most vague and sweeping of charges– contempt of court. Just punishment be damned. He got 3 days for the charge that he was there to answer for, a code violation for failing to force his tenants to remove their couch from their yard.

YouTube Preview Image

I got the feeling Mr. Burke and his violent enforcers were disappointed. My suspicions seemed to be validated that he had plans to arrest a lot more innocent people that day when an unusual announcement was made before he entered that anyone who didn’t stand for him would be subject to “sanction”. I happened upon one of his enforcers on election day who expressed his eagerness to “cuff me himself” when he saw me in public and said he’d recognized me from court. I’ve attended several trials to support my liberty activist friends and I never stand for those given the title “judge” by our unaccountable monopoly governments. When I asked what he would be arresting me for since I haven’t broken any laws, he left me with the cryptic answer of “You’ll see.” Now it seems clear to me what Mr. Burke and his thugs seem to have been planning for weeks– to use threats backed by real violence to crush the wills of anyone who would dare to question whether their “system of justice” is actually anything of the sort.

I’m tired of hearing how this is about a couch. One of the most irrelevant things about this story is the couch. Another rather inconsequential part of this story is the couch enforcer. The couch enforcer was the pebble that started an avalanche.  This case will be a classic for demonstrating the gun in the room, for showing the growing escalation of violence that must back even the most trivial of an authoritarian government’s demands against those who won’t obey, like a parking ticket or a questionable code violation.

Ian was brutally silenced by that arrest. The members of their court monitor our activities. It’s easy to do. Our communications and our activities are rather overtly open to the public. We like cameras. We like speaking openly out in the light of day. Scheming and secretiveness are not parts of our nature. The members of the court knew the questions Ian was going to ask. They had plenty of time to prepare answers. Ian was silenced because he was about to ask a series of questions that would be very difficult for their court to answer and sound reasonable. He was going to ask questions that would make people think, possibly make them see the courts in a very different light. He was about to ask those questions on camera for video that would be made into a documentary.

To Mr. Burke, thank you for showing the violent nature of monopolistic governments. Thank you for helping to wake people up to the fact that arbitrarily established institutions of consolidated power do not consolidate morality or truth. Thank you for demonstrating why no system can work when there is no one to watch the watchers. Thank you for crystallizing the inherent paradox of expecting a supremely powerful monopoly to be accountable to anyone, how there can be no meaningful checks and balances on power from the inside of a monopoly on violence. Thank you for showing us that you are accountable to no one; certainly not to the citizenry that you ostensibly serve. Thank you for pointing out the gun in the room. Thank you for being one of the most effective recruiters for the Free State Project and particularly for the liberty movements to the Keene area. It’s unfortunate that you had to do it at such a cost to the occupants of the Keene area who had their hard-earned money confiscated, ostensibly to do things like protect them from violent criminals. Instead their stolen money is being used to apply hugely disproportionate punishments to innocent people in order to protect your facade of authority.

Let this be fair warning to anyone who thinks they may want to work for real liberty and justice. Expressing your true beliefs openly and honestly in this country can make you a target to the people with a monopoly on violence. If you aren’t prepared for the potential consequences, tuck your tail between your legs and hang your head low, particularly on public prop… I mean on the state’s property. Hand over your money when they demand it. Kiss their boots when they demand it. You don’t have to mean it, but you have to act as if you do. After a while you will start to believe it. In the meantime, perhaps you can give a convincing performance. As for me, my acting sucks.

Ralph Waldo Emerson, walking by the jailhouse said to Thoreau through the window, “Henry, what are you doing in there?” To which Thoreau replied, “The right question is, Ralph, why are you out there?”

The original of this post may be found on the webcomic and blog known as Anarchy In Your Head.

22 Comments »

Comment by ColdSoul

November 16, 2008 @ 1:51 am

I hope Karma gets Mr. Burke some nice coal for his stocking. Good job on the blog post!

Comment by GRAFFITI

November 16, 2008 @ 8:00 am

Thank you for putting into words what many of us think, Bravo sir.

The velvet glove over the iron fist indeed.

Comment by fred

November 16, 2008 @ 11:46 am

The people of keene should “reserve the right to refuse service to anyone” when ed burke wants to buy gas for his car don’t sell it to him. when he wants to buy lunch don’t wait on him. let him just sit there. maybe he would get it then.

Comment by nick

November 16, 2008 @ 12:15 pm

“Then Ian is led into another room where nothing can be filmed or audio recorded”

Thats what they thought

Comment by Slolearner

November 16, 2008 @ 1:11 pm

Fred, you are right, but why stop with Burke? Does anyone know the names of the other public officals in the court room? What about the names of all the ones wearing badges or the ones actually wearing firearms.

Comment by Slolearner

November 16, 2008 @ 1:13 pm

Nick, I assume you are saying that there is more audio & video available?

Comment by modelmotion

November 16, 2008 @ 1:19 pm

Authority gone mad. It just proves the old mantra that power corrupts. Can you get any more corrupt than Burke. He is the incarnation of evil in a world that wants to be free. Shame on you Mr. Burke and thank you for exposing the corruption in your system of so called justice.

Comment by fester

November 16, 2008 @ 2:03 pm

Great post. I wonder how many thousands of dollars the government is going to spend to keep him in jail. I am sure the taxpayers of Keene are really getting their money’s worth. I have read that the average prisoner costs the government between $30,000 and $50,000 a year so I expect to keep Ian in jail it will cost taxpayers at least 8k.

Comment by Menno

November 16, 2008 @ 2:26 pm

This is one of the most eloquent and compelling communications I have read in a long time! Thank you for taking the time to express the facts so well!

Comment by nick

November 16, 2008 @ 7:20 pm

SloLearner,

That may or may not be what I’m saying.

If I/we have more to release, it will be in due time. I don’t want to be vague, but I can’t put my sources at risk either.

-Nick

Comment by fred

November 17, 2008 @ 12:22 am

what if everyone in Keene put a couch or a old chair in their yard would ed burke and his men in the costumes arrest all of the people in keene? did ed burke take a oath? Isn’t their only job to insure rights(life liberty and pursuit of happiness) ,coin money,and deliver the mail!!!Maybe ed burke and the men in costumes should read the documents they took a OATH!! too again..If your neighbors don’t have the authority to tell you what to do with your property how can they delegate something they don’t have to the men and women claiming to be the city? Isn’t the city a “legal fiction”

Comment by Denis Goddard

November 17, 2008 @ 2:24 pm

A few choice quotes from the New Hampshire Constitution:
[Art.] 15. [Right of Accused.] [...]Every subject shall have a right to [...] meet the witnesses against him face to face …”
[Art.] 18. [Penalties to be Proportioned to Offenses; True Design of Punishment.] All penalties ought to be proportioned to the nature of the offense. No wise legislature will affix the same punishment to the crimes of theft, forgery , and the like, which they do to those of murder and treason. Where the same undistinguishing severity is exerted against all offenses, the people are led to forget the real distinction in the crimes themselves, and to commit the most flagrant with as little compunction as they do the lightest offenses. For the same reason a multitude of sanguinary laws is both impolitic and unjust. The true design of all punishments being to reform, not to exterminate mankind.
[Art.] 22. [Free Speech; Liberty of the Press.] Free speech and liberty of the press are essential to the security of freedom in a state: They ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved.

Comment by ThatRoperDude

November 17, 2008 @ 3:13 pm

I think this relates to allodial title or land patent. Without that, one doesn’t own the full right to the land, they have a deed.

I see it like music copyrights. You can do a cover of a song without permission and it’s lawful as long as you pay the royalty. But you can’t take a sample of the sound recording and use that without permission.

I believe this case would be completely different with allodial title or land patent. I think Keene should check up on this.

Comment by Denis Goddard

November 17, 2008 @ 4:10 pm

To get allodial title in NH we will probably need a pro-liberty legislature. One of “our” Reps introduced the following bill a few years ago. If is a great start, but we’ll need a lot more libertarians in the House & Senate to make this pass. HB 1322 – relative to the establishment of allodial rights.

Comment by ThatRoperDude

November 17, 2008 @ 4:22 pm

What about land patent? It seems smarter anyway?

Comment by jim r

November 17, 2008 @ 6:56 pm

I feel terrible that this bully of a judge has locked up ian whom, in his pursuit of liberty, was caught in a trap. I don’t know exactly how it works in the US, but shouldn’t he have stated that he is there as a member of the public observant, stated he was there as an agent for the capitalized name: (”Ian Freeman”) and deny consent to the baliff (not the judge, who is a third-party) to take him into custody?

As I understand it, the statutes that they use to act upon an individual are only given the force of law by those whom are authorized. As a human being, you are the highest power next to God (whatever or whomever you perceive that to be) and anyone who tells you otherwise is merely providing an offer for you to accept. If he created joinder between himself and his strawman/capitalized name at any point, he could be taken into custody as he’s legally consented to give authority over to the bench/bank/judge. If this was a defacto court, he could have stated that he was the court’s administrator and any orders passed by the judge would be subject to a bill.

I’m no lawyer and have only been educating myself through thinkfree.ca and other sources like Luke-Michel: Denis, and Mary-Elizabeth: Croft, for a year or so. I’m intensely interested in how this verdict was legally passed and if my deconstruction was incorrect in any way.

I know that as soon as he sat down, he gave the judge the power he needed to arrest him, especially as he sat while he was claiming protest and duress. The judge clearly abused the faith given to him, though it was not unlawful, he is just a bully.

Comment by Denis Goddard

November 17, 2008 @ 7:02 pm

IAN IS FREE!!! YEEEAAAHHHHH!!!!

Comment by Daniel

November 22, 2008 @ 8:50 pm

Wow. Just, wow. Greetings from Sweden where freedom isn’t just a word :D

Comment by Curt Springer

November 23, 2008 @ 12:05 pm

I don’t think Europeans are in any position to point fingers at the US about freedom.

From http://www.answers.com/topic/hate-speech

Sweden prohibits hate speech, hets mot folkgrupp, and defines it as publicly making statements that threaten or express disrespect for an ethnic group or similar group regarding their race, skin colour, national or ethnic origin, faith or sexual orientation.

Comment by Daniel

November 23, 2008 @ 4:31 pm

Oh noes, we don’t let nazis gather to re-enact the Kristallnacht. My heart really goes out to them.

Anyway, way to comment out of topic bla bla.

Comment by Curt Springer

November 23, 2008 @ 5:08 pm

Well no, I don’t think we would allow nazis to destroy businesses or places of worship. But if they wanted to celebrate the 70th anniversary of it, they would not face criminal sanctions. Of course it would be disgusting and I would hope that people would show up in opposition.

If anybody went off-topic it was you, claiming that your country is somehow superior to ours in terms of freedom.

And, speaking of Kristallnacht, your country has a decidedly mixed record in World War II, sometimes using its neutrality as a cover for cooperating with the Nazis, sometimes saving their victims.

FYI and FWIW (not much), I am a direct descendant of Charles (Carl) Springer, a Swede who played a role in the life of what was once the colony of “New Sweden”, now Wilmington, Delaware (the home of the next vice president).

Comment by Daniel

November 23, 2008 @ 5:26 pm

They do, and we do. Shocking how answers.com doesn’t give the whole answer eh.

What Mr. Burke did would never happen here. I was giving a shoutout so the poster would see how far the post was spread. Smileys tend to indicate that you’re not being all that serious either. Maybe you should’ve looked that up on answers instead.

Read up on history and you’d see why but i don’t have the patience to educate you.

Go find a bridge to troll, i’m out.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation

Subscribe without commenting