Freedom of the Press in New Hampshire

7 Comments on Freedom of the Press in New Hampshire

nick on Sat, 14th Mar 2009 8:32 am


---

LOL! I love when Sam does things they don’t expect. This is just the beginning of this courtroom camera stuff.

Sam, if you tag this with FreeKeene.com, and submit this to CTV, or give it to Ian or I to do, the public will see more of this stuff, which they don’t get a lot of.


Dan Steward on Sat, 14th Mar 2009 8:52 am


---

Great video Sam!

I like it that you mentioned that these clerks, other have bonds. That would (IMHO) be the “license” that they have to practice their foul trade against the people of NH.

If they have a bond, it can be revoked, just like any doctor, lawyer, hairdresser, or whatever. If the bond is revoked, they’d have to go out and get a real job producing something that people would actually want and need.

All it takes is for one of these guys to even have their bond placed in peril of being revoked to make the rest of the gaggle of malcontents, sit up and take notice.

Nobody ever made them be nice and play nice before, the time appears to be long overdue. Thanks, Sam, Ian for bringing this to us.

Dan


NH Native on Sat, 14th Mar 2009 1:46 pm


---

How does being bonded by the state (RSA 93-B:1-a) make it illegal to give their name?


SamIam on Sat, 14th Mar 2009 2:05 pm


---

NH Native: There’s no relation. The bonds are sureties there to indemnify the bureaucrats from personal iiability for their mistakes. The bonds pay out to the victims of their mistakes. So when they continue deniing me in my rights, I’ll get to start liquidating their bonds in order to be made whole.

The best part is, others are learning the same process, so it’s going to get very expensive for local governments who continue employing out of control bureaucrats who believe they are above their own laws.


NH Native on Sat, 14th Mar 2009 3:03 pm


---

I should have proof read my question. I wanted to ask:
How does being bonded by the state (RSA 93-B:1-a) make it illegal to NOT give their name?
My bad.

You also said it is a crime in the video. Is that the Official Oppression RSA?

I’m guessing the “Official Oppression” violation comes from the fact the her name is a court record and as a court clerk, she is required to give you court records. Do I have this right?


SamIam on Sat, 14th Mar 2009 4:22 pm


---

NH Native – Good questions. I added the title in the middle and didn’t read them in that way for my preview. I should have caught that, it’s a little confusing.

If you want to explore all the laws than post in the forum. If you have any further questions, then perhaps you can tell me why your IP addresses is served out of New Jersey?

(Yea we can see it) You wouldn’t be some government lackey or a bar member would you?


NH Native on Sat, 14th Mar 2009 4:49 pm


---

I’ll register for the forum tomorrow. (if I remember)

I know you can see my IP. I don’t know why the IP address is served out of NJ. You’d have to ask Comcast.

I’m not a government lackey nor a bar member.

Post your comment below. Login in the far right column to get rid of CAPTCHA. If you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

Name (required)

Email Address (required)

Website

Speak your mind

CAPTCHA Code *