Recently, I had a hearing on the “administrative inspection warrant” that was the reason for the raid on the Keene Activist Center in June of 2011. Eventually that raid resulted in a criminal case bring brought against me over not having AC-powered, interconnected smoke alarms in my tenants’ home.
Good news! As a result of the hearing on the warrant, judge Runyon of district court issued an order reversing the fire inspection portion of the warrant and threw out all evidence gathered by fire chief Gary LaFreniere. Apparently judge Runyon agreed with my argument that NH RSA 153:14 II prohibits the fire chief from inspecting single family homes and duplexes. The city had argued that they believed it to be a “lodginghouse”, so that justified the fire inspection. However, as I pointed out, the city never proved it was a “lodginghouse” and never changed the legal status of the home from a single family. Therefore, the inspection was illegal and all evidence gathered by the fire chief has been suppressed.
I have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint as it was written by the same fire chief. The city attorney, Thom Mullins, has filed an objection to my motion to dismiss and further, has filed a motion to reconsider the judge’s decision, arguing the judge made an error.
So, the smoke alarm case isn’t closed entirely yet. Stay tuned here for the latest.
What is the takeaway here? If more homeowners stood up for themselves and their property rights and actually went to court, they would discover that even by the city/state’s own rules (to which I never consented, of course) that the city aggressors have no case. Either way, their attorney and staff have been tied up with trying to prove this case in court – and that means they have less time to threaten others. As a bonus, the court gets clogged with useless cases. Freedom and truth always win in the long run. You just have to be willing to take risk.