Wiretap Hearing Becomes Robin Hooding Inquiry

Yesterday’s hearing on proposed changes to New Hampshire’s RSA 570-A, the wiretapping statute, did not take long to become a symposium on Robin Hooding. With the first mention of the practice coming from the bureaucratic spokesperson Ann Rice, representing the Attorney General’s office, two Robin Hooders present (myself and Ian Freeman) also spoke on the bill. The president of the American Federation of Teachers’ New Hampshire chapter, Laura Hainey, denounced Robin Hooders while speaking at the hearing, and even went to so as to fear monger that the Robin Hooders would multiply if negligible codifications to the law were effected.

Essentially, the house bill 1550 is a well intentioned piece of legislation that ultimately changes nothing about the current law. It does attempt to clarify it from its current convoluted and confusing state. For example, the word ‘consent’ appears in the law, yet reading the letter of the law, nothing more than relaying the knowledge that one is being recorded is necessary to make fully legal an audio recording in a setting where one is lawfully permitted to be outside of explicitly public settings. Despite this, even the representative from the attorney general’s office, Ann Rice, continuously referred to the current law as requiring consent from all parties to produce audio recordings.

During my own testimony, I told the story of my own camera being robbed from my person without cause. I also stressed to committee members how their legal attack on the ability of civilians to create objective records is a criminalization of some of the most courageous forms of journalism and investigative reporting. Soon, New Hampshire will be a one party state, but unfortunately more people may be imprisoned, have their homes tossed or their electronics stolen from them while we await the full legalization of audio recording in the state.

Since Laura from the Teacher’s federation had some unkind and untruthful things to say about Robin Hooders during her testimony, I took the opportunity to ambush interview her in the hallway. When I asked her where she had heard some of the distasteful lies about Robin Hooders that she was perpetuating, she all of the sudden was at a loss for words, and B-lined for the nearest occupied committee room to hide from the camera. How hard would it have been to have said, “Perhaps I am wrong”? May she do more research on organizations and individuals she plans to rebuke next time around.

You can see all of raw videos from the hearing on a playlist at Fr33manTVraw, in addition to coverage provided by Ray Duckler of the Concord Monitor published in today’s print edition.

Now you can subscribe to Free Keene via email!

Don't miss a single post!


Subscribe
Notify of
guest


11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Molari

Well spoken, Ian. You laid out perfectly some impotent issues…

I know Ian thinks the same…it all boils down to principles of democracy, That to be able to freely document people in public places without being harassed by authorities.

One day wife and I will drive down to visit keene and invite you guys over for a great cup of coffee…it would be fun to share stories.

Take care and kind regards

Marvin Beall

Ian supports the principles of democracy? Really? I’ve never heard him endorse the oppression of minorities.

Molari

Really? You must be drinking bad water… I never said he endorses oppression of minorities!

Perhaps you have a disposition to vivid imagination when reading comments.

Cheers

Marvin Beall

So you’re saying that your idea of “democracy” is not based on the principle of “rule by the will of the majority?” That’s a curious form of democracy that I’ve never heard of. Please, tell us more.

Molari

Like I said, you have a disposition to interpret things out of nothing.

If you want to argue or debate, its a mooted.situation.

Marvin Beall

I wonder why you can’t answer a simple question. Is democracy “rule of the majority” or not? You’re the democracy cheerleader, Molari, and you don’t even know what you’re cheering for? Sorry to embarrass you, but when your mouth runs faster than your brain it’s not surprising you have nothing to say when you get called out for your ignorance.

Molari

You wonder why I wont answer you your attempts to debate here.

Respectably, simply, I am not here to debate.

I only made a comment to Ian that I agree that to be able to freely document people in public places without being harassed by authorities.

That is a principle of Democracy.

If you want to debate the issue politely and constructively, you can email me at dread_dpr@hotmail.com

I will be glad to discuss it with you there if you chose to.

Kind regards

Marvin Beall

So you’re a sanctimonious proponent of freely documenting other people in public because “that is a principle of Democracy,” but when it comes to accounting for your own (alleged) principles, then the democratic principle of free-and-open public debate goes out the window? I’m not sure which is more intellectually offensive: your repudiation of transparency or your ideological inconsistency.

Molari

Whoa man! lol

You clearly show a propensity to make a huge isue out of nothing.

Be offended if you want…..just take a breath or two and then try to enjoy your evening.

If you think I am a monster for not wanting to debate with you…so be it.

cheers

Marvin Beall

Me: “Let’s explore the principles of democracy.” You: “Whoa man. Take a breath or two. You think I’m a monster. You clearly show a propensity to make a huge issue out of nothing. You must be drinking bad water. You have a disposition to interpret things out of nothing. You have a disposition to vivid imagination when reading comments.” Considering that you were the one who first brought up the issue of “democracy,” you sure seem much more interested in talking about my “dispositions” than this ideal you want other people to believe you hold so dear. Meanwhile I haven’t… Read more »

Molarii

Quote Marvin Beal: “Considering that you were the one who first brought up the issue of “democracy,” Me: I commented on the news article thread above and don’t need your permission or to debate you to make a short comment. It does appear that you go nuts when someone mentions democracy, Quote Marvin Beal: “you sure seem much more interested in talking about my “dispositions” Me: I am sorry, you have me at a disadvantage as I do not live in Keene and not familiar with RL names of each activists. I know who Garret Ean and Ian Freeman is,… Read more »

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x