Liberty Lobbyist Darryl W Perry and his fellow libertarian activists once again drop in on a bunch of hearings at the state house legislative offices. Here are multiple videos of full and partial hearings and some clips:
HB 613 would reform the solitary confinement system in jails and prisons in New Hampshire. There’s some incredibly moving testimony during this full-length hearing video:
HB 562 – NH liberty legislators propose exempting internet gambling from gambling prohibitions. This video is a partial hearing:
HB 550 would create a controlled drug review board putting experts in charge of scheduling drugs in New Hampshire rather than a single bureaucrat. It also creates an NH drug schedule separate distinct from the federal one. This video is not the full hearing, but is most of it:
HB 215 would create a study committee to look at legalization of cannabis in New Hampshire. This video is the full hearing:
HCR 9 is a House Resolution that proposes to affirm New Hampshire’s state sovereignty and right to nullify the federal government. It’s not secession, but it’s a step in the right direction. This video is the supermajority of the hearing, starting only a few minutes in.
HB 598 by Representative Dick Marple would make car registration voluntary for non-commercial purposes and also make drivers licenses optional. This is the full hearing video:
Finally, a couple of clips of Darryl’s testimony in front of the elections committee on:
HB 320 – would have an algorithm determine electoral districts
HB 459 – would adjust the challenged voter affidavit
I’m curious Ian with your fascination to age of concent in your eyes? Did your ex girlfriend Renee concent to you when you were dating her as early as 15 years old, maybe earlier, or did her parents approve of your ideas of concent? You realize she has 20+ years to understand what you did to her right? Its amazing that you seem to not care that the FBI is investigating you for similar crimes? Keep setting up more fodder on your Tor Node for the FBI, they will thank you later when your behind bars.
KC darling, are you really trying to make the case here that someone could retroactively withdraw consent even twenty years after the fact? You know, lamb, I’m quite astonished that someone of your age and experience still doesn’t understand how consent works. But let’s entertain the fact that you are able to magically determine when things like consent are given – you know – without knowing the specifics of the situation or any of the parties involved. One would think that someone with such an amazing gift would be using it to benefit their own life and family rather than… Read more »
i think it was 14… Drac, it has more to do with AGE …a child might agree to anything…
True David. But intellectual maturity varies from person to person – especially with teenagers. As these statutes stand, consent is presumed to be illegitimate no matter what the circumstances and no investigation to find the truth is required. This position has led to all sorts of grave injustices.
So what’s the problem with HB 372? Just because you claim to be from different cities and states doesn’t mean it’s dangerous. It sounds like you are trying to save your butt. Darryl continues on with the same old rhetoric.
Well Jacks, if this isn’t a safety issue, then by your standard of logic the bureaucrats of New Hampshire really don’t need to be in the business of classifying its denizens as “residents” or “inhabitants” at all, now do they? And since NH doesn’t have any formal procedure for establishing residency anyway, then why is this amendment being considered in the first place?
Why don’t you prove what your stating. Show me where it would be “dangerous”
I made no such argument, Jacks. I was questioning NH’s entire notion of classifying its denizens as “residents” or “inhabitants” in the first place. And as I pointed out already, NH has no formal procedure for establishing residency anyway – outside of proof of a rental or mortgage payment that is. Since this is the case, why is there suddenly a demand to redefine this statute?
was at the resident etc bill… i intend to testify at sb3 bc i have a better understanding of it ….my idea was that hb372 was the same but.was not certain and everyone but the SOS’s office was against it… the election weather one didnt seem that troublesome….suffice to say i wouldnt advocate for the exploitation of misguided teens …it makes me feel sick…
Drac The population of a state, county, or city is important as far as federal and state funding goes. Welfare, and other social programs are also based upon those population numbers.
US Census forms will be mailed to addresses in NH no matter how NH decides to classify its citizens. The federal government only cares about the total head count in the state. Maybe you should try again, Jacks. I believe in you, you know.
Drac, as I stated before is the population of a state county or city directly affects the funding for social programs, grants, and other monies from the government. It also aids in fire protection, ambulance, and police. Obviously the larger the population, the more coverage will be needed and the more money will be needed.
And as I stated, Jacks, NH’s statute designating its denizens as either “residents” or “inhabitants” has absolutely no bearing on the total head count – which is what’s used when distributing funding for those distribution schemes you’re so fond of. If more precise demographical data is needed to determine the government’s allotments, it’s collected from those charming long-form questionnaires passed out during US Census years. You know Jacks, I was all excited that this time around you were finally going to try harder. You wouldn’t care to have another go at this, now would you? I’m game if you are.… Read more »
Drac – Your constant childish rants and raves not to mention your idiotic sarcasm only show how little you know about this subject. I’m the one who tried to have a decent conversation with you and as usual you were unable to follow through. You are a fool and a troll. How pathetic.
Now, now Jacks. Please try not to lose control of yourself in public. It’s quite undignified. But to address your complaints, you should know that I’ve always been open to having an intellectual sort of discourse with you. The problem is that you’re incapable of restraining your prideful nature every time you’re facts are challenged. Until you can learn to control this, conversation will never be able to fall into place naturally. Case in point, Jacks, I clearly know more about this subject than you do. HB 372 has absolutely nothing to do with the government’s funding distribution schemes which… Read more »
Drac, again your arrogant and childish behaviors are the best you can do. The only thing you know about this bill is what you think you have read on the internet. I suggest you get a personality before continuing on with any conversations.
My goodness Jacks, you’re quite the hard case, now aren’t you! Why we’ve been at this back and forth for what must be ages now, and you still haven’t gotten it through your thick skull that you can’t win a debate with Jacksisms! Fortunately, I’m here to help you, Jacks. Your road to improvement will start by reading more about NH SB 3 | 2017. Trust me, Jacks, doing this is going to change your life for the better. You’ll see.
So Jacks, have you taken the time to look into all the hubbub surrounding NH SB 3 | 2017 yet? I’m still biding my time waiting for a well-reasoned argument to come from you, you know. Now please understand that I’m well aware that this takes you far, far away from your own comfort zone, dearie, but I’m still crossing my fingers that you won’t dash my hopes this time.
HB 94 is not “confusing.” It prevents old pervs buying sex from underage girls from using the “I thought she was old enough” defense.