Airing on this week’s AKPF #1 timeslot is an unprecedented revamp of Dolus, a prior episode. The infamous CoK official DPRK video of the ‘doctored’ Robin Hooding is replaced with courtroom footage to put you in the action with cast and dedicated fans of the Aqua Keene Parking Force. Additionally, fans receive more content from amateur videographer Peter ‘Sturdy’ Thomas, who did not appear in the court proceedings. See for yourself why AKPF is #1 in the Robin Hood:
We covered quite a lot this week: City Candidates questionnaire, the Darryl vs Kendall debate, Pumpkin Fest, gender roles, masturbation brain fogs, police brutality and the Stanford Prison experiment. The Rapsher joins. Visit BlackSheepRising.org for show notes.
A local business owner is stopped and harassed and threatened by Keene police on 2013-10-18. Keene Cop Block‘s Ian Freeman is nearby and responds with his video camera. The man is happy for the scene to be recorded so Ian gets in the passenger side of the car!
In the video below, Garret Ean of Keene Peaceful Streets asks Jason Short a question about the mysterious sniper teams atop city rooftops during the Pumpkin Fest celebration earlier in the day. To avoid answering this simple question Officer Short does something both illegal and dangerous.
Despite Officer Short being covered in dark clothing (except for his face) he crossed the normally busy road as an alert Penske Box Van Driver spotted him and slowed the vehicle down. Garret hung back out of harms way to document the evasive enforcer violating the law he has sworn to uphold.
Sadly, the original author of this piece appears to have removed the content from his syndicator. Here’s the pic of the snipers taken by Graham Colson, below that is where his story would have appeared. Sorry for this inconvenience. -Ian
Last Monday, the Keene Sentinel ran a letter to the editor from petty-tyrant Fred Parsells titled Stealing from Keene taxpayers. Fred writes, in part, “Since my earliest years, I have always been of the belief that the English folklore tale of Robin Hood was about a man and his band of merry men who stole from the rich and gave to the poor.
Fast forward 60-plus years and now I, and those of us who live and pay taxes in Keene, are confronted with a variation on the theme in that a modern day group of individuals, who have adopted the name Robin Hood(ers), are in my opinion stealing from the people of Keene, of which the overwhelming majority are surely far from rich… The end result is that Keene property taxes will be raised accordingly in order to balance the loss of revenue.”
I wrote a response to Fred’s letter, which was published today (Pumpkin Fest day – which likely means more paper sales) which reads:
On Oct. 14, The Keene Sentinel published a letter to the editor from Code Enforcement Officer Fred Parsells, in which he said “I have always been of the belief that the English folklore tale of Robin Hood was about a man and his band of merry men who stole from the rich and gave to the poor.”
He then went on to say that the Robin Hooders who plug parking meters are “stealing” from the “far-from-rich Keene taxpayers” by plugging parking meters and saving those same “far-from-rich Keene taxpayers” from $5 parking tickets.
However, Parsells begins on a flawed understanding of the tale of Robin Hood. Robin Hood did not steal from the rich and give to the poor. The poor were having their wealth confiscated by Prince John, so Robin Hood stepped in to take that wealth back from the king’s men to return it to the poor.
Parsells also claims to be concerned about the taxpayers, yet he receives a taxpayer-funded pension as a retired member of the Keene Police Department, and a paycheck as a code enforcer. Fred claims that by preventing people from getting parking tickets, the Robin Hooders will cause property taxes to “be raised accordingly in order to balance the loss of revenue.”
If Fred were really concerned about the taxpayer, he would not only resign his position as a code enforcer and surrender his pension, but he would advocate for the City Council to eliminate the code enforcement department. Inhabitants and business-owners spend nearly $3 million per year on licenses, permits and fees, and untold amounts of money complying with various zoning regulations and other ordinances that dictate how one is to live or work.
The two code enforcement officers, of which Fred Parsells is one, make a total of $122,588 per year. This directly costs the taxpayers more than any amount of Robin Hooding will ever supposedly cost (assuming that helping people comply with the parking ordinances — i.e. preventing the collection of a fine — actually costs money).
As a candidate for mayor, and the only opposition to Kendall Lane, I fully support the abolition of the code enforcement department and all zoning ordinances. There are several municipalities in New Hampshire that have no zoning. Nationally, there are large cities that have no zoning, Houston being the largest city without zoning ordinances.
Homeowners care about their safety, and have an inherent interest in making sure they live in a house that won’t fall in on itself. People should not be forced by government dictate to live in a building that meets someone else’s standards.
I would like to make one slight correction, Fred is a Housing Inspector, not a Code Enforcer. The 2012-2013 budget listed 1.34 Housing Inspectors at a total cost of $56,585. The entire budget for the Health & Code Enforcement Department for FY 2012-2013 is $903,663.
While attending the three day long trial of Rich Paul, friend of Free Keene ‘Amish Paul’ was ticketed twice in two days. During that trial, courtroom doors were locked between breaks in which no re-entry was permitted. Having received a green flier from Robin Hood of Keene suggesting he consider challenging the ticket, Paul took the two tickets to court, and on October 17, a trial was held in his honor.
Paul was requested to arrive at 10:00am, and entering the courtroom shortly thereafter, he found one parking enforcer already awaiting the proceedings in the audience. The state’s prosecutor approached Paul and informed him that one ticket was being prosecuted today, and the other dismissed, as only one of the two parking enforcers who had issued the tickets was available for court. Delighted to have achieved one victory before the contest started, he would wait through another forty-five minutes of pretrial hearings and plea deals before the parking ticket case was called.